A Digital Resilience Intervention for Emergency Medical Service Workers
Self-Reflective Resilience-Recovery Activity Promotion Training for Emergency Medical Service Personnel
1 other identifier
interventional
83
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Emergency medical service (EMS) workers (i.e., ambulance service providers) experience triple the risk for anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) compared to the general U.S. population. These mental disorders impact health and well-being across the life course. Thus, there is a critical need for interventions targeting key risk factors that can reduce EMS workers' mental health risk. Chronic stress represents such a risk factor and is a routine feature of the EMS profession due to the demands of providing emergency medical care. Self-Reflective Resilience-Recovery Activity Promotion Training (SRR-RAPT) promotes finding positive meaning in stressors by building self-awareness of the coping and regulatory responses used to manage them; evaluating those responses; adapting them based upon their perceived effectiveness; and developing a plan for managing similar stressors in the future based on what can be learned from the current situation. In addition to prompting self-monitoring and active reflection on stressors and coping responses, SRR-RAPT encourages practicing recovery activities that permit a person's stressor induced strain level to return to baseline. The primary objective of the current study is to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and adoptability of SRR-RAPT among EMS personnel. A secondary objective was to examine the intervention's effect on hypothesized mechanisms of action predicted to vary in response to the intervention, as well as consider the intervention's ability to reduce mental health symptoms. It is hypothesized that the intervention will be associated with more positive meaning made, adaptive self-reflection, recovery activities, and recovery experiences, as well as lower levels of mental health symptoms.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 28, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 20, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 20, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 24, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 6, 2025
CompletedMarch 10, 2025
March 1, 2025
6 months
February 24, 2025
March 5, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Time period required to achieve target sample size
The number of months it takes to recruit the number of participants necessary to reach the target sample size.
From study initiation until at least 80 participants are recruited, up to 12 months
Number of participants recruited and randomized each week of the study
A count of the number of participants who are recruited and randomized each week that the study is taking place.
From study initiation until at least 80 participants are recruited, up to 12 months
Acceptability
Assessed with 3 items asking about respondents' perceptions that the intervention was helpful ("I found that answering the questions about managing stressful experiences and practicing recovery behaviors was helpful"); useful ("I found that answering the questions about managing stressful experiences and practicing recovery behaviors was useful"); and not burdensome ("I found that answering the questions about managing stressful experiences and practicing recovery behaviors was not too burdensome"). Respondents rated each item on a scale ranging from 1 ("Strongly Disagree") to 5 ("Strongly Agree"). Ratings are summed to yield a total daily score.
Day 8 of the intervention
Adoptability
Assessed with 3 items asking about respondents intention to use what they had learned from the intervention in the future ("I will keep using these questions to help manage stressful experiences and practice recovery activities in the future." "I will try to use these questions in the future when managing stressful experiences and trying to practice recovery activities." "I plan to use some of the approaches that I came up with in my responses to the questions about managing stressful experiences and practicing recovery behaviors in the future"). Respondents rate each item on a scale ranging from 1 ("Strongly Disagree") to 5 ("Strongly Agree"). Ratings are summed to yield a total daily score.
Day 8 of the intervention
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Meaning Made
Days 1 to 8 of the intervention
Adaptive Self-Reflection
Days 1 to 8 of the intervention
Recovery Activities
Days 1 to 8 of the intervention
Recovery Experiences
Days 1 to 8 of the intervention
PTSD Symptom Severity
Days 1 to 8 of the intervention
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Self-Reflective Resilience-Recovery Activity Promotion Training (SRR-RAPT)
EXPERIMENTALReceives Self-Reflective Resilience-Recovery Activity Promotion Training (SRR-RAPT)
Usual Care
NO INTERVENTIONDoes not receive SRR-RAPT.
Interventions
Self-Reflective Resilience-Recovery Activity Promotion Training (SRR-RAPT) promotes finding positive meaning in stressors by building self-awareness of the coping and regulatory responses used to manage them; evaluating those responses; adapting them based upon their perceived effectiveness; and developing a plan for managing similar stressors in the future based on what can be learned from the current situation. In addition to prompting self-monitoring and active reflection on stressors and coping responses, SRR-RAPT encourages practicing recovery activities that permit a person's stressor induced strain level to return to baseline. SRR-RAPT is administered daily for 8 consecutive days.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Full-time or part-time employee at an emergency medical service agency
- ≥ 18 years of age
- ≥ 1 emergency medical service shift scheduled in the next 8 days from recruitment date.
You may not qualify if:
- Not a full-time or part-time employee at an emergency medical service agency
- \< 18 years of age
- \< 1 emergency medical service shift scheduled in the next 8 days from recruitment date.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Syracuse University
Syracuse, New York, 13244, United States
Related Publications (6)
Cella D, Choi SW, Condon DM, Schalet B, Hays RD, Rothrock NE, Yount S, Cook KF, Gershon RC, Amtmann D, DeWalt DA, Pilkonis PA, Stone AA, Weinfurt K, Reeve BB. PROMIS(R) Adult Health Profiles: Efficient Short-Form Measures of Seven Health Domains. Value Health. 2019 May;22(5):537-544. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.02.004.
PMID: 31104731BACKGROUNDZuromski KL, Ustun B, Hwang I, Keane TM, Marx BP, Stein MB, Ursano RJ, Kessler RC. Developing an optimal short-form of the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). Depress Anxiety. 2019 Sep;36(9):790-800. doi: 10.1002/da.22942. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
PMID: 31356709BACKGROUNDSonnentag S, Fritz C. The Recovery Experience Questionnaire: development and validation of a measure for assessing recuperation and unwinding from work. J Occup Health Psychol. 2007 Jul;12(3):204-21. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.12.3.204.
PMID: 17638488BACKGROUNDPressman SD, Matthews KA, Cohen S, Martire LM, Scheier M, Baum A, Schulz R. Association of enjoyable leisure activities with psychological and physical well-being. Psychosom Med. 2009 Sep;71(7):725-32. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181ad7978. Epub 2009 Jul 10.
PMID: 19592515BACKGROUNDCooper C, Katona C, Livingston G. Validity and reliability of the brief COPE in carers of people with dementia: the LASER-AD Study. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2008 Nov;196(11):838-43. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e31818b504c.
PMID: 19008735BACKGROUNDCarver CS. You want to measure coping but your protocol's too long: consider the brief COPE. Int J Behav Med. 1997;4(1):92-100. doi: 10.1207/s15327558ijbm0401_6.
PMID: 16250744BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 24, 2025
First Posted
March 6, 2025
Study Start
June 28, 2023
Primary Completion
December 20, 2023
Study Completion
December 20, 2023
Last Updated
March 10, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share