NCT06861400

Brief Summary

Emergency medical service (EMS) workers (i.e., ambulance service providers) experience triple the risk for anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) compared to the general U.S. population. These mental disorders impact health and well-being across the life course. Thus, there is a critical need for interventions targeting key risk factors that can reduce EMS workers' mental health risk. Chronic stress represents such a risk factor and is a routine feature of the EMS profession due to the demands of providing emergency medical care. Self-Reflective Resilience-Recovery Activity Promotion Training (SRR-RAPT) promotes finding positive meaning in stressors by building self-awareness of the coping and regulatory responses used to manage them; evaluating those responses; adapting them based upon their perceived effectiveness; and developing a plan for managing similar stressors in the future based on what can be learned from the current situation. In addition to prompting self-monitoring and active reflection on stressors and coping responses, SRR-RAPT encourages practicing recovery activities that permit a person's stressor induced strain level to return to baseline. The primary objective of the current study is to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and adoptability of SRR-RAPT among EMS personnel. A secondary objective was to examine the intervention's effect on hypothesized mechanisms of action predicted to vary in response to the intervention, as well as consider the intervention's ability to reduce mental health symptoms. It is hypothesized that the intervention will be associated with more positive meaning made, adaptive self-reflection, recovery activities, and recovery experiences, as well as lower levels of mental health symptoms.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
83

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2023

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 28, 2023

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 20, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 20, 2023

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 24, 2025

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 6, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

March 10, 2025

Status Verified

March 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

February 24, 2025

Last Update Submit

March 5, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Emergency Medical Service PersonnelPsychological Resilience

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Time period required to achieve target sample size

    The number of months it takes to recruit the number of participants necessary to reach the target sample size.

    From study initiation until at least 80 participants are recruited, up to 12 months

  • Number of participants recruited and randomized each week of the study

    A count of the number of participants who are recruited and randomized each week that the study is taking place.

    From study initiation until at least 80 participants are recruited, up to 12 months

  • Acceptability

    Assessed with 3 items asking about respondents' perceptions that the intervention was helpful ("I found that answering the questions about managing stressful experiences and practicing recovery behaviors was helpful"); useful ("I found that answering the questions about managing stressful experiences and practicing recovery behaviors was useful"); and not burdensome ("I found that answering the questions about managing stressful experiences and practicing recovery behaviors was not too burdensome"). Respondents rated each item on a scale ranging from 1 ("Strongly Disagree") to 5 ("Strongly Agree"). Ratings are summed to yield a total daily score.

    Day 8 of the intervention

  • Adoptability

    Assessed with 3 items asking about respondents intention to use what they had learned from the intervention in the future ("I will keep using these questions to help manage stressful experiences and practice recovery activities in the future." "I will try to use these questions in the future when managing stressful experiences and trying to practice recovery activities." "I plan to use some of the approaches that I came up with in my responses to the questions about managing stressful experiences and practicing recovery behaviors in the future"). Respondents rate each item on a scale ranging from 1 ("Strongly Disagree") to 5 ("Strongly Agree"). Ratings are summed to yield a total daily score.

    Day 8 of the intervention

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Meaning Made

    Days 1 to 8 of the intervention

  • Adaptive Self-Reflection

    Days 1 to 8 of the intervention

  • Recovery Activities

    Days 1 to 8 of the intervention

  • Recovery Experiences

    Days 1 to 8 of the intervention

  • PTSD Symptom Severity

    Days 1 to 8 of the intervention

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Self-Reflective Resilience-Recovery Activity Promotion Training (SRR-RAPT)

EXPERIMENTAL

Receives Self-Reflective Resilience-Recovery Activity Promotion Training (SRR-RAPT)

Behavioral: Self-Reflective Resilience-Recovery Activity Promotion Training

Usual Care

NO INTERVENTION

Does not receive SRR-RAPT.

Interventions

Self-Reflective Resilience-Recovery Activity Promotion Training (SRR-RAPT) promotes finding positive meaning in stressors by building self-awareness of the coping and regulatory responses used to manage them; evaluating those responses; adapting them based upon their perceived effectiveness; and developing a plan for managing similar stressors in the future based on what can be learned from the current situation. In addition to prompting self-monitoring and active reflection on stressors and coping responses, SRR-RAPT encourages practicing recovery activities that permit a person's stressor induced strain level to return to baseline. SRR-RAPT is administered daily for 8 consecutive days.

Self-Reflective Resilience-Recovery Activity Promotion Training (SRR-RAPT)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Full-time or part-time employee at an emergency medical service agency
  • ≥ 18 years of age
  • ≥ 1 emergency medical service shift scheduled in the next 8 days from recruitment date.

You may not qualify if:

  • Not a full-time or part-time employee at an emergency medical service agency
  • \< 18 years of age
  • \< 1 emergency medical service shift scheduled in the next 8 days from recruitment date.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Syracuse University

Syracuse, New York, 13244, United States

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Cella D, Choi SW, Condon DM, Schalet B, Hays RD, Rothrock NE, Yount S, Cook KF, Gershon RC, Amtmann D, DeWalt DA, Pilkonis PA, Stone AA, Weinfurt K, Reeve BB. PROMIS(R) Adult Health Profiles: Efficient Short-Form Measures of Seven Health Domains. Value Health. 2019 May;22(5):537-544. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.02.004.

    PMID: 31104731BACKGROUND
  • Zuromski KL, Ustun B, Hwang I, Keane TM, Marx BP, Stein MB, Ursano RJ, Kessler RC. Developing an optimal short-form of the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). Depress Anxiety. 2019 Sep;36(9):790-800. doi: 10.1002/da.22942. Epub 2019 Jul 29.

    PMID: 31356709BACKGROUND
  • Sonnentag S, Fritz C. The Recovery Experience Questionnaire: development and validation of a measure for assessing recuperation and unwinding from work. J Occup Health Psychol. 2007 Jul;12(3):204-21. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.12.3.204.

    PMID: 17638488BACKGROUND
  • Pressman SD, Matthews KA, Cohen S, Martire LM, Scheier M, Baum A, Schulz R. Association of enjoyable leisure activities with psychological and physical well-being. Psychosom Med. 2009 Sep;71(7):725-32. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181ad7978. Epub 2009 Jul 10.

    PMID: 19592515BACKGROUND
  • Cooper C, Katona C, Livingston G. Validity and reliability of the brief COPE in carers of people with dementia: the LASER-AD Study. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2008 Nov;196(11):838-43. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e31818b504c.

    PMID: 19008735BACKGROUND
  • Carver CS. You want to measure coping but your protocol's too long: consider the brief COPE. Int J Behav Med. 1997;4(1):92-100. doi: 10.1207/s15327558ijbm0401_6.

    PMID: 16250744BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Combat DisordersAnxiety DisordersDepression

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Stress Disorders, TraumaticTrauma and Stressor Related DisordersMental DisordersBehavioral SymptomsBehavior

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 24, 2025

First Posted

March 6, 2025

Study Start

June 28, 2023

Primary Completion

December 20, 2023

Study Completion

December 20, 2023

Last Updated

March 10, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations