Improving Sports and Recreation Services in Mashhad for Elderly and Intergenerational Interaction (ESPIRE-M)
ESPIRE-M
Design and Development of Strategies for Improving the Quality of Service and Utilization of Sporting and Recreational Places in the Municipality of Mashhad With the Approach to Elderly-Friendly City
1 other identifier
interventional
384
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This interventional study aims to design strategies to improve service quality and productivity in recreational sports facilities in Mashhad Municipality, focusing on creating an age-friendly city. The research consists of two parts: fieldwork and an experimental section. Field Section:
- Control Group: 78 seniors continued daily routines without structured activities.
- Experimental Groups:
- Non-sport intergenerational interaction sessions (90 minutes, 3x/week).
- Intergenerational yoga sessions (90 minutes, 3x/week).
- Light aerobic exercises + group discussions (90 minutes, 3x/week).
- Non-exercise intergenerational sessions in a park (90 minutes, 3x/week).
- Non-exercise intergenerational sessions in a nursing home (90 minutes, 3x/week).
- 384 customers of Mashhad Municipality sports facilities (192 women, 192 men). Key Notes:
- Elderly participants were selected through cluster sampling; younger participants were purposively sampled from Mashhad's Islamic Azad University.
- Gender balance (50% women, 50% men) was maintained in all groups. Main Questions:
- How do service quality factors influence customers of Mashhad Municipality sports facilities?
- Do intergenerational programs improve quality of life, health, and well-being for seniors?
- What are the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats for elderly sports participation?
- What strategies can enhance elderly participation in sports?
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 5, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 15, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 12, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 11, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 5, 2025
CompletedMarch 5, 2025
March 1, 2025
1 month
February 11, 2025
March 2, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Effects of Intergenerational Interventions on Quality of Life Effects of Intergenerational Interventions on Quality of Life Effects of Intergenerational Interventions on Quality of Life
Quality of Life (QOL) was assessed using the World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire (Short Form), a 26-item tool measuring four dimensions: physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment. Items are rated on a 6-point scale, with scores converted to a 0-100 scale. Higher scores indicate better QOL. * Pre-Test Scores: * Physical Health: Range = 12.5-68.75 * Psychological: Range = 31.25-62.5 * Social Relationships: Range = 37.5-50 * Environment: Range = 25-62.5 * Post-Test Scores: * Physical Health: Range = 25-68.75 * Psychological: Range = 18.75-62.5 * Social Relationships: Range = 28.125-46.875 * Environment: Range = 12.5-37.5 * Results: * Physical health: 41.53 (baseline) → 70.97 (post-intervention). * Psychological: 40.93 → 63.31. * Social relationships: 42.94 → 50.20. * Environment: 44.15 → 52.62.
Baseline and after a 3-month intervention period.
Effects of Intergenerational Interventions on Mental Health (General Health)
Mental health was assessed using the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28), a 28-item tool evaluating physical symptoms, anxiety, social functioning, and depression. Items are scored from 0 to 3, with total scores ranging from 0-84. Higher scores indicate greater psychological distress. Pre-test Scores: Somatic symptoms: 4-21 Anxiety and sleep disorder: 2-21 Social function: 7-21 Depression symptoms: 9-21 Total: 29-70 Post-test Scores: Somatic symptoms: 5-21 Anxiety and sleep disorder: 1-21 Social function: 7-20 Depression symptoms: 7-21 Total: 30-68 * Somatic symptoms: 13.61 (baseline) → 8.78 (post-intervention). * Anxiety and sleep disorder: 13.62 → 7.27. * Social function: 15.48 → 11.95. * Depression symptoms: 13.57 → 6.63.
Baseline and after a 3-month intervention period.
Effects of Intergenerational Interventions on Depression Levels
Depression levels were measured using the Geriatric Depression Scale (Short Form), a 15-item binary response questionnaire specifically designed for the elderly. Scores range from 0-15, with higher scores indicating greater depression. Pre-test Scores: 8-15 Post-test Scores: 5-14
Measurements were taken at baseline and after a 3-month intervention period.
Study Arms (6)
Experimental Group 1
EXPERIMENTAL* Tasks: Engage in 90-minute non-sport intergenerational interaction sessions, three times weekly for three months, in a controlled indoor environment. Activities include paired interactions and group discussions. * Participants: 60 seniors (30 women, 30 men) and 60 younger individuals (30 women, 30 men, average age 21.45 ± 0.35 years).
Experimental Group 2
EXPERIMENTAL* Tasks: Participate in 90-minute intergenerational yoga sessions, three times weekly for three months, in a gym setting. Sessions include warm-up, yoga exercises (asanas and pranayama), and relaxation. * Participants: 60 seniors (30 women, 30 men) and 60 younger individuals (30 women, 30 men).
Experimental Group 3
EXPERIMENTAL* Tasks: Engage in 60-minute light aerobic exercises in a park, followed by 30-minute group discussions, three times weekly for three months. * Participants: 60 seniors (30 women, 30 men) and 60 younger individuals (30 women, 30 men).
Experimental Group 4
EXPERIMENTAL* Tasks: Participate in 90-minute non-exercise intergenerational interaction sessions in a park, focusing on group discussions and storytelling. * Participants: 60 seniors (30 women, 30 men) and 60 younger individuals (30 women, 30 men).
Experimental Group 5
EXPERIMENTAL* Tasks: Engage in 90-minute non-exercise intergenerational interaction sessions in a nursing home, focusing on group discussions and storytelling. * Participants: 60 seniors (30 women, 30 men) and 60 younger individuals (30 women, 30 men).
Control Group
OTHER* Tasks: Continue daily routines without intergenerational interaction or structured activities. * Participants: 78 seniors (39 women, 39 men) selected through stratified random sampling.
Interventions
Engage in 90-minute intergenerational interaction sessions, three times a week for three months, in a controlled indoor environment. * Spend the first 45 minutes actively interacting with a younger participant in pairs, collaborating on activities of interest to the senior. * Participate in group activities such as book reading, puzzles, joke-telling, and sharing experiences for the remaining 45 minutes. * Attend 36 sessions held on odd days in the main hall of the Neshat Center. * Gender Representation: * 60 participants (30 women and 30 men) aged 60 and above, selected through stratified random sampling from Mashhad's elderly population. * 60 younger participants (30 women and 30 men) with an average age of 21.45 ± 0.35 years, selected through purposive sampling from Mashhad's Islamic Azad University.
Participate in 90-minute intergenerational yoga sessions, three times a week for three months, in a gym setting. * Perform modified yoga exercises suitable for seniors, including: * 20 minutes of warm-up with stretching and joint rotations. * 50 minutes of main exercises (asanas and pranayama). * 20 minutes of relaxation and meditation (Shavasana). * Attend sessions on odd days at 9 AM in the Neshat Center yoga hall. * Gender Representation: * 60 participants (30 women and 30 men) aged 60 and above, selected through stratified random sampling from Mashhad's elderly population. * 60 younger participants (30 women and 30 men) with an average age of 21.45 ± 0.35 years, selected through purposive sampling from Mashhad's Islamic Azad University.
Engage in 60-minute light aerobic exercises, three times a week for three months, in a park setting. * Follow warm-up and aerobic exercises led by a senior fitness instructor. * Spend 30 minutes in a friendly group discussion, sharing experiences and memories with younger participants. * Attend sessions on even days at 9 AM in Mashhad's Mellat Park. * Gender Representation: * 60 participants (30 women and 30 men) aged 60 and above, selected through stratified random sampling from Mashhad's elderly population. * 60 younger participants (30 women and 30 men) with an average age of 21.45 ± 0.35 years, selected through purposive sampling from Mashhad's Islamic Azad University.
Participate in 90-minute intergenerational interaction sessions, three times a week for three months, in a park setting. * Engage in non-exercise activities such as group discussions, storytelling, and sharing experiences with younger participants. * Attend sessions on even days at 9 AM in Mashhad's Mellat Park. * Gender Representation: * 60 participants (30 women and 30 men) aged 60 and above, selected through stratified random sampling from Mashhad's elderly population. * 60 younger participants (30 women and 30 men) with an average age of 21.45 ± 0.35 years, selected through purposive sampling from Mashhad's Islamic Azad University.
Engage in 90-minute intergenerational interaction sessions, three times a week for three months, in a nursing home setting. * Participate in non-exercise activities such as group discussions, storytelling, and sharing experiences with younger participants. * Attend sessions on odd days at 9 AM in the nursing home. * Gender Representation: * 60 participants (30 women and 30 men) aged 60 and above, selected through stratified random sampling from Mashhad's elderly population. * 60 younger participants (30 women and 30 men) with an average age of 21.45 ± 0.35 years, selected through purposive sampling from Mashhad's Islamic Azad University.
Continue with their daily routines without participating in any intergenerational interaction or structured activities. * No specific interventions or programs are provided. * Gender Representation: * 78 participants (39 women and 39 men) aged 60 and above, selected through stratified random sampling from Mashhad's elderly population.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Elderly Participants:
- Aged 60 years or older.
- Ability to engage in physical activities.
- Absence of sensory or motor disabilities.
- No use of antidepressant medications.
- No history of conditions such as Alzheimer's or other illnesses that could pose risks during exercise.
- Younger Participants:
- Aged 20 to 24 years.
- Unmarried.
- Living with their parents.
- Native residents of Mashhad.
You may not qualify if:
- Irregular attendance (more than two absences).
- Physical or psychological issues hindering participation.
- Lack of willingness to continue.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Zinat Ebrahimilead
Study Sites (2)
Department of Physical Education and Sport Science, Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj, Iran.
Sanandaj, Kurdistan Province, 0098, Iran
Department of Physical Education and Sport Science, Faculty of Humanities and Literature, Sanandaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj, Iran.
Sanandaj, Kurdistan Province, 6616947455, Iran
Related Publications (17)
Ebrahimi, Zinat. Helen Nazary, Parivash Piraki. (2023). The Service Quality of Sport-entertainment Facilities of Mashhad Municipality with the Approach of an Elderly-friendly City in 2018 (Persian). Journal of Gerontology (joge), 7(4): 89-100. DOI: 10.22034/JOGE.7.4.8. https://joge.ir/article-1-618-fa.html
BACKGROUNDVeisi, K. Ismailzadeh Ghandehary, M.R. Ebrahimi, Z. (2023). Comparing the Effectiveness of Interventions of Intergenerational Interaction and Physical Activities on Depression of Elderly Women and Men (Persian). Journal of Gerontology (joge). 8(1): 10-19. https://joge.ir/article-1-620-fa.html
BACKGROUNDEbrahimi Z, Esmaeilzadeh Ghandehary MR, Veisi K. Comparing the efficacy of Yoga exercise and intergenerational interaction program on mental health of elderly. J Research & Health2019; 9(5): 401- 410.
BACKGROUNDEshun-Wilson I, Siegfried N, Akena DH, Stein DJ, Obuku EA, Joska JA. Antidepressants for depression in adults with HIV infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 22;1(1):CD008525. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008525.pub3.
PMID: 29355886BACKGROUNDSteptoe A, Deaton A, Stone AA. Subjective wellbeing, health, and ageing. Lancet. 2015 Feb 14;385(9968):640-648. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61489-0. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
PMID: 25468152BACKGROUNDSantini S, Tombolesi V, Baschiera B, Lamura G. Intergenerational Programs Involving Adolescents, Institutionalized Elderly, and Older Volunteers: Results from a Pilot Research-Action in Italy. Biomed Res Int. 2018 Dec 5;2018:4360305. doi: 10.1155/2018/4360305. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 30627555BACKGROUNDMurayama Y, Ohba H, Yasunaga M, Nonaka K, Takeuchi R, Nishi M, Sakuma N, Uchida H, Shinkai S, Fujiwara Y. The effect of intergenerational programs on the mental health of elderly adults. Aging Ment Health. 2015;19(4):306-14. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2014.933309. Epub 2014 Jul 10.
PMID: 25010219BACKGROUNDMurayama Y, Murayama H, Hasebe M, Yamaguchi J, Fujiwara Y. The impact of intergenerational programs on social capital in Japan: a randomized population-based cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2019 Feb 6;19(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6480-3.
PMID: 30727981BACKGROUNDMosor E, Waldherr K, Kjeken I, Omara M, Ritschl V, Pinter-Theiss V, Smolen J, Hubel U, Stamm T. An intergenerational program based on psycho-motor activity promotes well-being and interaction between preschool children and older adults: results of a process and outcome evaluation study in Austria. BMC Public Health. 2019 Mar 1;19(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6572-0.
PMID: 30823911BACKGROUNDLuanaigh CO, Lawlor BA. Loneliness and the health of older people. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2008 Dec;23(12):1213-21. doi: 10.1002/gps.2054.
PMID: 18537197BACKGROUNDKamei T, Itoi W, Kajii F, Kawakami C, Hasegawa M, Sugimoto T. Six month outcomes of an innovative weekly intergenerational day program with older adults and school-aged children in a Japanese urban community. Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2011 Jun;8(1):95-107. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-7924.2010.00164.x. Epub 2010 Dec 9.
PMID: 21615702BACKGROUNDHalpin SN, Dillard RL, Idler E, Clevenger C, Rothschild E, Blanton S, Wilson J, Flacker JM. The benefits of being a senior mentor: Cultivating resilience through the mentorship of health professions students. Gerontol Geriatr Educ. 2017 Jul-Sep;38(3):283-294. doi: 10.1080/02701960.2015.1079707. Epub 2015 Aug 7.
PMID: 26251869BACKGROUNDDi Martino G, Della Valle C, Centorbi M, Buonsenso A, Fiorilli G, Crova C, di Cagno A, Calcagno G, Iuliano E. Bridging Generations Through Movement: "How and Why" Intergenerational Programs Operate-A Systematic and Narrative Review. Geriatrics (Basel). 2024 Oct 22;9(6):139. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics9060139.
PMID: 39449376BACKGROUNDBruce ML. Psychosocial risk factors for depressive disorders in late life. Biol Psychiatry. 2002 Aug 1;52(3):175-84. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01410-5.
PMID: 12182924BACKGROUNDBarbosa, M. R., Campinho, A., & Silva, G. (2021). "give and receive": The impact of an intergenerational program on institutionalized children and older adults. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 19(3), 283-304.
BACKGROUNDAu, A., Ng, E., Garner, B., Lai, S., & Chan, K. (2015). Proactive aging and intergenerational mentoring program to promote the well-being of older adults: pilot studies. Clinical Gerontologist, 38(3), 203-210.
BACKGROUNDAlonso-Cortes Fradejas B, Lafuente-Ureta R, Calvo S, Fernandez-Gorgojo M, Poveda-Lopez JL, Jimenez-Sanchez C. Analysis of an intergenerational service-learning experience based on physical exercise in a community setting: a mixed-method study. Front Public Health. 2025 Jan 14;12:1509016. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1509016. eCollection 2024.
PMID: 39926288BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dr. Zinat Ebrahimi, Professor
Physical Education and Sport, Islamic Azad Sanandaj, Iran.
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- In addition to the roles specified above (Participant and Outcomes Assessor), the following parties are also masked in this clinical trial: 1. Data Analysts: Individuals analyzing the trial data to prevent bias in the interpretation of results. 2. Monitoring Entities: Independent monitors overseeing the trial, who are kept unaware of the treatment allocations to ensure objectivity in their assessments. This masking strategy helps maintain the integrity of the trial and reduces the risk of bias impacting the outcomes.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 11, 2025
First Posted
March 5, 2025
Study Start
September 5, 2018
Primary Completion
October 15, 2018
Study Completion
February 12, 2019
Last Updated
March 5, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Due to persistent technical difficulties in providing a functional web address for the IPD sharing plan on the clinical trial site, interested parties are encouraged to contact zin368@gmail.com for further information. We have encountered issues that prevent the proper display or access of the sharing link, necessitating this alternative means of communication.