NCT06854887

Brief Summary

Compare the diagnostic accuracy of tomosynthesis with 2D mammography in cases with suspected BI-RADS 4 or 5 to determine its potential benefit for staging

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
64

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2025

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 25, 2025

Completed
3 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 28, 2025

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 3, 2025

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 29, 2026

Completed
3 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

March 3, 2025

Status Verified

February 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

February 25, 2025

Last Update Submit

February 28, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Recording The breast density in both tomosynthesis and mammography for the main and satellite lesions

    The breast density according to ACR BIRADS in both tomosynthesis and mammography for the main and satellite lesions

    baseline

  • Recording the type of lesion in both tomosynthesis and mammography for the main and satellite lesions

    the type of lesion (mass , microcalcification , architectural distortion) in both tomosynthesis and mammography for the main and satellite lesions

    baseline

  • Recording the probability of multifocality or multicentricity in both tomosynthesis and mammography for the main and satellite lesions

    the probability of multifocality or multicentricity in both tomosynthesis and mammography for the main and satellite lesions

    baseline

  • Recording the location of the tumor within the mammary quadrants and the depth of the tumor in both tomosynthesis and mammography for the main and satellite lesions

    The location of the tumor within the mammary quadrants (upper , lower , outer , inner ) and the depth (anterior-middle-posterior) of the tumor in both tomosynthesis and mammography for the main and satellite lesions

    baseline

  • Recording the tumor histopathology type for the main and satellite lesions

    Recording the tumor histopathology type (ductal, lobular , in situ , others) for the main and satellite lesions

    baseline

Interventions

tomosynthesis is 3D image for the breast mammography is 2D image for the breast

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

This study included patients with BIRADS 4 or 5 lesions who pathologically proved to be breast cancer by TCNB

You may qualify if:

  • BI-RADS 4 OR 5 LESION that pathologically proved to be breast cancer.
  • No history of previous operations
  • No history of chemotherapy or radiotherapy

You may not qualify if:

  • BI-RADS 1 ,2,3 lesions
  • History of previous operation

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (3)

  • Mariscotti G, Durando M, Houssami N, Fasciano M, Tagliafico A, Bosco D, Casella C, Bogetti C, Bergamasco L, Fonio P, Gandini G. Comparison of synthetic mammography, reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography: evaluation of lesion conspicuity and BI-RADS assessment categories. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Dec;166(3):765-773. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4458-3. Epub 2017 Aug 17.

  • Bernardi D, Belli P, Benelli E, Brancato B, Bucchi L, Calabrese M, Carbonaro LA, Caumo F, Cavallo-Marincola B, Clauser P, Fedato C, Frigerio A, Galli V, Giordano L, Giorgi Rossi P, Golinelli P, Morrone D, Mariscotti G, Martincich L, Montemezzi S, Naldoni C, Paduos A, Panizza P, Pediconi F, Querci F, Rizzo A, Saguatti G, Tagliafico A, Trimboli RM, Zappa M, Zuiani C, Sardanelli F. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): recommendations from the Italian College of Breast Radiologists (ICBR) by the Italian Society of Medical Radiology (SIRM) and the Italian Group for Mammography Screening (GISMa). Radiol Med. 2017 Oct;122(10):723-730. doi: 10.1007/s11547-017-0769-z. Epub 2017 May 25.

  • Marinovich ML, Hunter KE, Macaskill P, Houssami N. Breast Cancer Screening Using Tomosynthesis or Mammography: A Meta-analysis of Cancer Detection and Recall. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 Sep 1;110(9):942-949. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy121.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Mammography

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

RadiographyDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosis

Central Study Contacts

Silvia Gamal Rasmy

CONTACT

Eman Abo Elhamd

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
resident doctor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 25, 2025

First Posted

March 3, 2025

Study Start

February 28, 2025

Primary Completion

March 29, 2026

Study Completion

April 1, 2026

Last Updated

March 3, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-02