Testing the Implementation of a Toolbox to Optimize Data Collection and Data Quality of the National Medical Quality Indicators in Long-term Care Facilities: A Pilot Study. (NIP-Q-UPGRADE Subaim 1.8)
1 other identifier
interventional
22
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Since 2019, long-term care facilities in Switzerland are obliged by the Federal Insurance Law (KVG, Art. 59a) to report data for the calculation and public reporting of medical quality indicators (MQI). By 2024, this is done in four clinical domains: polypharmacy, pain, malnutrition and the use of physical restraints. This data is used for both monitoring quality of care on a national level and for internal quality of care development. To be valid and reliable, MQI data needs to be collected according to specified measurement instructions. An ethnographic study conducted within the NIP-Q-UPGRADE identified numerous challenges, which can lead to poor data quality. The overall aim of this pilot study is to test the implementation of a data quality development toolkit concerning the MQI. The toolkit uses a train-the-trainer strategy. The research team will prepare external training providers to train delegated staff from the long-term care facilities (further called champions), who will then train and support their co-workers to collect reliable MQI data. The research team developed training and support materials and organized an e-mail contact centre for MQI related questions for the participating facilities. Implementation outcomes will be assessed at two levels: long-term care facilities and the external training providers. Objectives at the external training provider level:
- 1.To determine the acceptability and feasibility of the training and support materials.
- 2.To determine the fidelity to the training and adaptations made when implementing it.
- 3.To identify the barriers and facilitators for the implementation of the training.
- 4.To measure the costs associated with delivering the training.
- 5.To determine the acceptability and the feasibility of the data quality development toolkit components.
- 6.To determine the fidelity to toolkit components and adaptations made when implementing it.
- 7.To identify the barriers and facilitators for the implementation of the toolkit.
- 8.To measure the costs associated with implementing the toolkit.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 5, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 3, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 27, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2025
CompletedFebruary 25, 2026
February 1, 2025
5 months
January 3, 2025
February 23, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Acceptability of the toolbox
Acceptability of toolbox components will be assessed in a survey with Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), a 4-item instrument measuring the acceptability of an intervention. Further exploration of acceptability in qualitative interviews and focus groups
After each champion's training unit (baseline, 3 weeks and 9 weeks): interview with trainer. At 3 months: survey and focus groups with champions, leadership, nursing and care staff. At 6 months: focus group with champions.
Feasibility of the toolbox
Feasibility of toolbox components will be assessed in a survey with Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM), a 4-item instrument measuring the feasibility of an intervention. Further exploration of feasibility in qualitative interviews and focus groups.
After each champion's training unit (baseline, 3 weeks and 9 weeks): interview with trainer. At 3 months: survey and focus groups with champions, leadership, nursing and care staff. At 6 months: focus group with champions.
Implementation fidelity
Degree of fidelity to each component (yes, partial, no) will be measured using a questionnaire survey. Further exploration of implementation fidelity in qualitative interviews and focus groups.
After each champion's training unit (baseline, 3 weeks and 9 weeks): interview with trainer. At 3 months: survey and focus groups with champions, leadership, nursing and care staff. At 6 months: focus group with champions.
Barriers to the implementation of the toolbox
Barriers to the implementation will be explored in qualitative interviews and focus groups, and categorized according to the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research (CFIR)
After each champion's training unit (baseline, 3 weeks and 9 weeks): interview with trainer. At 3 months: focus groups with champions, leadership, nursing and care staff. At 6 months: focus group with champions.
Facilitators to the implementation of the toolbox
Facilitators to the implementation will be explored in qualitative interviews and focus groups, and categorized according to the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research (CFIR)
At 3 months: focus groups with champions, leadership, nursing and care staff. At 6 months: focus group with champions.
Sum of costs associated with implementation of the toolkit in Swiss francs
Costs will be calculated based on time spent on implementation activities per staff group with corresponding hourly salary estimate, recorded in an activity logbook
Continuously from baseline training to 3 months after
Study Arms (1)
Long-term care facilities
EXPERIMENTALAll participating facilities will be offered the same toolbox
Interventions
The toolkit uses a train-the-trainer strategy. The research team will: * develop training and support materials for external training providers and delegated staff (champions) from the long-term care facilities * prepare external training providers within a one 3h session to train champions from the long-term care facilities * organize an e-mail contact centre for MQI related questions for the participating facilities. The external training providers will: \- train the champions in one full day (8h) in-person training session and in 2 online sessions a 4h and 2h to support their co-workers to collect reliable MQI data. Based on the received training, the champions will: * provide internal trainings to the care and nursing team, * perform data quality monitoring, * provide feedback on data quality and act as a contact person for questions on MQI in their facility.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- External training providers:
- willing to implement trainings as designed by the research team and to all interested long-term care facilities
- have capacity to provide the trainers and infrastructure for the trainings - agree to non-commercial use of training materials
- Trainer:
- with competence in training staff of long-term care facilities
- with knowledge on data collection of the current MQIs
- Long-term care facilities:
- with a cantonal recognition as a residential long-term care facility
- willing to implement the toolkit
- which can nominate at least one champion
- Champions:
- Long-term care facility employees motivated to take up the role
- having sufficient knowledge of the residents, infrastructure and processes in the facility (e.g., resident care, needs assessment instrument, electronic health records)
- Ideally with experience in leadership, staff training, MQI data collection and quality monitoring, e.g., nurse, nurse expert, quality manager, needs assessment instrument manager
- Management and staff responsible for quality:
- +5 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- \. long-term care facilities that are participants of the study "Data Quality and National Quality Indicators in Long-term Care Facilities: a Validation Study and Evaluation Study"
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland (SUPSI), Manno, Switzerland.
Manno, Canton Ticino, 6928, Switzerland
Institut für Pflegewissenschaft - Nursing Science (INS), University of Basel
Basel, 4056, Switzerland
La Source School of Nursing, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland
Lausanne, Switzerland
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Franziska Zúñiga, Prof. Dr.
University of Basel
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Prof. Dr. Franziska Zúñiga
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 3, 2025
First Posted
February 27, 2025
Study Start
December 5, 2024
Primary Completion
April 30, 2025
Study Completion
June 30, 2025
Last Updated
February 25, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share