Cost-Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes of Double J Stent Versus Percutaneous Feeding Tube Placement Following Open Pyeloplasty in Pediatric Patients: A Prospective Randomized Single-center Study
DJS
2 other identifiers
interventional
140
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Open pyeloplasty is a common surgical intervention for pediatric patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Post-operative management strategies, including the use of a double J stent and a percutaneous feeding tube, vary widely. While both options have demonstrated effectiveness in drainage, their relative clinical outcomes, costs, and overall value in pediatric urology remain unclear. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to compare the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of these two post-operative interventions in pediatric patients undergoing open pyeloplasty.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 10, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 21, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 26, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 10, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 10, 2025
CompletedFebruary 26, 2025
February 1, 2025
6 months
February 21, 2025
February 25, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Complication Rate
Rate of Complication including pain, bleeding, re operation
up to 4 weeks on post follow up on clinical examination and relevant investigations
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Cost Effectiveness
one month on post follow up on clinical examination and relevant investigation
Study Arms (1)
PUJO
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients having PUJ Obstruction and booked for open pyeloplasty
Interventions
Patient in whom a PrcFT will be placed for post op drainage
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with primary PUJO and outflow obstruction on renal Scan who are candidates for elective open pyeloplasty
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who are previous operated for PUJO , and having recurrence
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Institute of Kidney Disease.
Peshawar, KPK, 25124, Pakistan
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Abdul Haseeb, MBBS, MRCS
Institute Of kidney Diseases
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Post graduate resident
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 21, 2025
First Posted
February 26, 2025
Study Start
January 10, 2025
Primary Completion
July 10, 2025
Study Completion
July 10, 2025
Last Updated
February 26, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF, CSR
- Time Frame
- The data will be made publicly available six months after the primary study results are published in a peer-reviewed journal. The dataset will remain accessible for a period of five years from the initial release, after which continued access will be evaluated based on scientific interest and data usage
- Access Criteria
- The IPD will be stored in a secure, electronic form with the principal investigator. Researchers interested in accessing the data will be required to submit a request to the principal author via this email: ahaseeb.dr@gmail.com Conditions for Data Access Access to the shared data will be granted to qualified researchers affiliated with recognized academic or clinical institutions. Interested researchers must submit a methodologically sound research proposal outlining the objectives and intended use of the data. Approval will be based on scientific merit and alignment with ethical standards. Before access is granted, researchers will be required to: Sign a Data Use Agreement (DUA) to ensure appropriate use of the dataset Agree to maintain confidentiality and not attempt to re-identify participants Provide a commitment to acknowledge the original study and funding sources in any resulting publications
As part of our commitment to research transparency and data-sharing practices, we plan to share individual participant data (IPD) obtained from this clinical trial. The purpose of sharing IPD is to enable further research, facilitate meta-analyses, and contribute to scientific advancements that can improve patient care and clinical outcomes. Scope of Data to be Shared The de-identified individual participant data that will be shared includes: Demographic details such as age, sex, and relevant baseline characteristics Clinical and laboratory data collected during the study Outcome measures related to the study objectives Adverse event reports and safety data All shared data will be de-identified to ensure participant confidentiality and privacy in accordance with applicable ethical guidelines and regulatory requirements.