Empirical Intravenous Beta-Lactam Plus Metronidazole Vs Oral Cefixime Plus Metronidazole for the Treatment of Liver Abscess
Comparison of Empirical Intravenous Beta-Lactam Antimicrobials Plus Metronidazole and Oral Cefixime Plus Metronidazole Therapy for the Treatment of Liver Abscess: an Open Label Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
220
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Liver abscess (LA) is potentially life threatening medical emergency requiring prompt medical intervention. The backbone of therapy is prompt empirical antimicrobial with or without percutaneous drainage/ aspiration of the abscess. The standard care for liver abscess includes empirical antimicrobials consisting both antibacterial and amoebicidal agents along with percutaneous drainage or aspiration of the collection. The antimicrobial regimen should cover against E. histolytica until microbial etiology is established or liver abscess of amoebic etiology is ruled out. But still there is no straightforward general agreement or evidence based on clinical studies regarding the standard protocol for empirical antimicrobials concerning choice, route of administration or duration of antimicrobials therapy. Most of the experts preferred intravenous antimicrobials over oral antimicrobials for the treatment of liver abscess with or without complication. But, there is no clinical trial evidence to support the rational of using intravenous antibiotics up front instead of oral antimicrobials. Recently published institutional study also suggested that empirical oral antimicrobials (Cefexime/Ciprofloxacin) were efficacious for the treatment of uncomplicated liver abscess, successfully managing around 90 % cases of liver abscess. When treating a liver abscess, the choice of antimicrobials and the administration technique must be specially tailored depending upon the existence of complications and the patient's clinical reaction. In the absence of clinical trials, the rational for using of intravenous broad spectrum antibiotics upfront instead of oral antimicrobials for the treatment of liver abscess with or without complications is doubtful and may appear injudicious contributing future rise of antimicrobial resistance. The use of intravenous antibiotics upfront may also unnecessarily lengthen hospital stays, enhance therapeutic expenditure, and raise the risk of hospital-acquired infections in patients who are capable for taking antimicrobials orally. Oral antimicrobials strategy will promote earlier discharge from the hospital and the patient can return to usual activities earlier. This study aims to provide valuable insights into the comparison and efficacy of empirical intravenous Beta-lactam antimicrobials plus Metronidazole and oral Cefixime plus Metronidazole therapy for the treatment of uncomplicated liver abscess. In this randomised controlled open label clinical trial all the patients with newly diagnosed liver abscess confirmed with radiology imaging, either by USG or CT scan, presenting at emergency or medical OPD will be screened for enrolment in the study. Following written informed consent from the participants and/or their legal guardian, those who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be recruited in the study. Subsequently the participants will be randomized into either intravenous or oral antimicrobial group. The intravenous-group will receive Beta-lactam antimicrobials (i.e Piperacillin-Tazobactum 4.5g q 8 hourly or Ceftriaxone 1g q 12 hourly or Meropenem 1g q 8 hourly or Imipenem-Cilastatin 500mg q 6 hourly) Plus intravenous Metronidazole 750mg q 8 hourly for 2weeks. The oral-group will receive tablet Cefixime 200 mg q 12 hourly plus tablet Metronidazole 800 mg q 8 hourly for 2 weeks. Both the group will be provided standard care of therapy including percutaneous drainage or aspiration as per indication and will be followed up for 8 weeks. The primary outcome of clinical cure and secondary outcome of incidence of treatment failure, mortality, duration of antimicrobial therapy, recurrence, adverse drug reaction (ADR), complications will be compared between the groups.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Feb 2025
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 21, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 25, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 26, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2026
April 13, 2025
April 1, 2025
1.3 years
February 21, 2025
April 10, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Clinical cure
"clinical cure" is defined as defined as participants becoming asymptomatic with fever resolution for ≥48 hours, including USG demonstrating no drainable or aspiratable collection in the liver along with removal of the pigtail catheter if any.
8 weeks
Treatment failure
"Treatment failure" is defined as the fulfilling of any one or more of the following conditions: 1. Persistently symptomatic even after 72 h of empirical antimicrobial therapy and percutaneous aspiration or drainage of the hepatic collection 2. Emergence of fresh or additional collection in the liver during the course of empirical antimicrobial therapy 3. Emergence of shock and or new onset organ failure (Encephalopathy, ARDS, AKI, MODS) during the course of therapy, leading to modification of oral antimicrobials to intravenous antimicrobials or up gradation of the ongoing intravenous antimicrobials 4. If pus culture demonstrates growth of microorganism which is not sensitive to the ongoing antimicrobials (intravenous Beta-lactam or oral Cefixime) along with inadequate clinical response to the therapy 5. Participants requiring persistent drainage or repeated aspiration of the abscess even after 4 weeks of empirical antimicrobial therapy
8 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Duration of the therapy
8 weeks
Need for prolong antibiotics therapy
8 weeks
Duration of hospital stay
8 weeks
Readmission
8 weeks
Recurrence of liver abscess
8 weeks
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Intravenous Beta-Lactam antimicrobials
ACTIVE COMPARATORIntravenous beta-lactam antimicrobial for 2 weeks Plus Intravenous Metronidazole (750 mg q 8 hourly) for 2 weeks and standard care
Oral Cefixime
ACTIVE COMPARATORTablet Cefixime (200 mg q 12 hourly) for 2 weeks Plus Table Metronidazole (800 mg q 8 hourly) for 2 weeks and standard care
Interventions
Intravenous beta-lactam antimicrobial for 2 weeks Plus Intravenous Metronidazole (750 mg q 8 hourly) for 2 weeks and standard care
Tablet Cefixime (200 mg q 12 hourly) for 2 weeks Plus Tablet Metronidazole (800 mg q 8 hourly) for 2 weeks
Percutaneous drainage or aspiration of the abscess along resuscitative and symptomatic medications
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER)
Chandigarh, 160012, India
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 21, 2025
First Posted
February 26, 2025
Study Start
February 25, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2026
Last Updated
April 13, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Plans to share individual participant data (IPD) will considered with reasonable request to the principal investigator depending upon Institutional Ethic Committee approval.