NCT06847126

Brief Summary

Liver abscess (LA) is potentially life threatening medical emergency requiring prompt medical intervention. The backbone of therapy is prompt empirical antimicrobial with or without percutaneous drainage/ aspiration of the abscess. The standard care for liver abscess includes empirical antimicrobials consisting both antibacterial and amoebicidal agents along with percutaneous drainage or aspiration of the collection. The antimicrobial regimen should cover against E. histolytica until microbial etiology is established or liver abscess of amoebic etiology is ruled out. But still there is no straightforward general agreement or evidence based on clinical studies regarding the standard protocol for empirical antimicrobials concerning choice, route of administration or duration of antimicrobials therapy. Most of the experts preferred intravenous antimicrobials over oral antimicrobials for the treatment of liver abscess with or without complication. But, there is no clinical trial evidence to support the rational of using intravenous antibiotics up front instead of oral antimicrobials. Recently published institutional study also suggested that empirical oral antimicrobials (Cefexime/Ciprofloxacin) were efficacious for the treatment of uncomplicated liver abscess, successfully managing around 90 % cases of liver abscess. When treating a liver abscess, the choice of antimicrobials and the administration technique must be specially tailored depending upon the existence of complications and the patient's clinical reaction. In the absence of clinical trials, the rational for using of intravenous broad spectrum antibiotics upfront instead of oral antimicrobials for the treatment of liver abscess with or without complications is doubtful and may appear injudicious contributing future rise of antimicrobial resistance. The use of intravenous antibiotics upfront may also unnecessarily lengthen hospital stays, enhance therapeutic expenditure, and raise the risk of hospital-acquired infections in patients who are capable for taking antimicrobials orally. Oral antimicrobials strategy will promote earlier discharge from the hospital and the patient can return to usual activities earlier. This study aims to provide valuable insights into the comparison and efficacy of empirical intravenous Beta-lactam antimicrobials plus Metronidazole and oral Cefixime plus Metronidazole therapy for the treatment of uncomplicated liver abscess. In this randomised controlled open label clinical trial all the patients with newly diagnosed liver abscess confirmed with radiology imaging, either by USG or CT scan, presenting at emergency or medical OPD will be screened for enrolment in the study. Following written informed consent from the participants and/or their legal guardian, those who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be recruited in the study. Subsequently the participants will be randomized into either intravenous or oral antimicrobial group. The intravenous-group will receive Beta-lactam antimicrobials (i.e Piperacillin-Tazobactum 4.5g q 8 hourly or Ceftriaxone 1g q 12 hourly or Meropenem 1g q 8 hourly or Imipenem-Cilastatin 500mg q 6 hourly) Plus intravenous Metronidazole 750mg q 8 hourly for 2weeks. The oral-group will receive tablet Cefixime 200 mg q 12 hourly plus tablet Metronidazole 800 mg q 8 hourly for 2 weeks. Both the group will be provided standard care of therapy including percutaneous drainage or aspiration as per indication and will be followed up for 8 weeks. The primary outcome of clinical cure and secondary outcome of incidence of treatment failure, mortality, duration of antimicrobial therapy, recurrence, adverse drug reaction (ADR), complications will be compared between the groups.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
220

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_3

Timeline
1mo left

Started Feb 2025

Shorter than P25 for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress89%
Feb 2025Jun 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 21, 2025

Completed
4 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 25, 2025

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 26, 2025

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2026

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2026

Last Updated

April 13, 2025

Status Verified

April 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

February 21, 2025

Last Update Submit

April 10, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Liver Abscess, Empirical antimicrobials, Beta-lactam antimicrobials, Intravenous, Oral, Cefixime, Metronidazole

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Clinical cure

    "clinical cure" is defined as defined as participants becoming asymptomatic with fever resolution for ≥48 hours, including USG demonstrating no drainable or aspiratable collection in the liver along with removal of the pigtail catheter if any.

    8 weeks

  • Treatment failure

    "Treatment failure" is defined as the fulfilling of any one or more of the following conditions: 1. Persistently symptomatic even after 72 h of empirical antimicrobial therapy and percutaneous aspiration or drainage of the hepatic collection 2. Emergence of fresh or additional collection in the liver during the course of empirical antimicrobial therapy 3. Emergence of shock and or new onset organ failure (Encephalopathy, ARDS, AKI, MODS) during the course of therapy, leading to modification of oral antimicrobials to intravenous antimicrobials or up gradation of the ongoing intravenous antimicrobials 4. If pus culture demonstrates growth of microorganism which is not sensitive to the ongoing antimicrobials (intravenous Beta-lactam or oral Cefixime) along with inadequate clinical response to the therapy 5. Participants requiring persistent drainage or repeated aspiration of the abscess even after 4 weeks of empirical antimicrobial therapy

    8 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Duration of the therapy

    8 weeks

  • Need for prolong antibiotics therapy

    8 weeks

  • Duration of hospital stay

    8 weeks

  • Readmission

    8 weeks

  • Recurrence of liver abscess

    8 weeks

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Intravenous Beta-Lactam antimicrobials

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Intravenous beta-lactam antimicrobial for 2 weeks Plus Intravenous Metronidazole (750 mg q 8 hourly) for 2 weeks and standard care

Drug: Intravenous beta-lactam antimicrobial for 2 weeks Plus Intravenous Metronidazole (750 mg q 8 hourly) for 2 weeksOther: Standard medical care

Oral Cefixime

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Tablet Cefixime (200 mg q 12 hourly) for 2 weeks Plus Table Metronidazole (800 mg q 8 hourly) for 2 weeks and standard care

Drug: Tablet Cefixime (200 mg q 12 hourly) for 2 weeks Plus Tablet Metronidazole (800 mg q 8 hourly) for 2 weeksOther: Standard medical care

Interventions

Intravenous beta-lactam antimicrobial for 2 weeks Plus Intravenous Metronidazole (750 mg q 8 hourly) for 2 weeks and standard care

Also known as: Standard care
Intravenous Beta-Lactam antimicrobials

Tablet Cefixime (200 mg q 12 hourly) for 2 weeks Plus Tablet Metronidazole (800 mg q 8 hourly) for 2 weeks

Also known as: Standard Medical care
Oral Cefixime

Percutaneous drainage or aspiration of the abscess along resuscitative and symptomatic medications

Intravenous Beta-Lactam antimicrobialsOral Cefixime

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER)

Chandigarh, 160012, India

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Liver Abscess

Interventions

WW Domain-Containing OxidoreductaseStandard of Care

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Abdominal AbscessAbscessSuppurationInfectionsLiver DiseasesDigestive System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Short Chain Dehydrogenase-ReductasesNAD (+) and NADP (+) Dependent Alcohol OxidoreductasesAlcohol OxidoreductasesOxidoreductasesEnzymesEnzymes and CoenzymesTumor Suppressor ProteinsNeoplasm ProteinsProteinsAmino Acids, Peptides, and ProteinsQuality Indicators, Health CareQuality of Health CareHealth Services AdministrationHealth Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation

Central Study Contacts

Deba Prasad Dhibar, MD Medicine

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 21, 2025

First Posted

February 26, 2025

Study Start

February 25, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Last Updated

April 13, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Plans to share individual participant data (IPD) will considered with reasonable request to the principal investigator depending upon Institutional Ethic Committee approval.

Locations