NCT06842381

Brief Summary

Objectives: The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of telerehabilitation versus a face-to-face program in the therapeutic approach to non-specific neck pain through exercise and analgesic electrotherapy. Methods: Randomized clinical trial on 100 participants with nonspecific neck pain who will be randomized into two groups to receive analgesic electrotherapy combined with a cervical exercise program through telemedicine or face to face. A total of 24 sessions will be applied over 8 weeks. Demographic and clinical data, disability, pain intensity, kinesiophobia, isometric spinal muscle strength, quality of life, and cervical mobility will be collected. Assessments will be performed at the beginning of the study (baseline), at 8 weeks (post-treatment) and 2 months after the end of the intervention (follow-up).

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable chronic-pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable chronic-pain

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 12, 2025

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 24, 2025

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2025

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 30, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 28, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

December 22, 2025

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

February 12, 2025

Last Update Submit

December 15, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Neck disability index

    The neck disability index consists of 10 questions addressing functional activities such as personal care, lifting, reading, work, driving, sleeping, recreational, pain intensity, concentration and headache. Each item will be scored on a scale from 0 (no limitation). (severe limitation or inability to perform the activity). The total score will be calculated by summing the item scores, dividing by the maximum possible score of 50 (if all 10 questions are answered), and multiplying by 100 to generate a percentage. A score of 0% indicates full independence, while 100% represents complete dependence.

    At baseline, 8 weeks and 6 months (follow up).

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Pain (Visual Analog Scale)

    At baseline, 8 weeks and 6 months (follow up).

  • McGill Pain Questionnaire (Disability)

    At baseline, 8 weeks and 6 months (follow up).

  • Quality of Life (SF-36 quality of life questionnaire)

    At baseline, 8 weeks and 6 months (follow up).

  • Quality of Sleep (Pittsburgh Quality of Sleep Questionnaire Index)

    At baseline, 8 weeks and 6 months (follow up).

  • Tampa scale for kinesiophobia

    At baseline, 8 weeks and 6 months (follow up).

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Telerehabilitation Program

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients will be instructed in the therapeutic approach through a telerehabilitation program using a portable TENS (Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation) with a specific program for cervical pain (ENRAF NONIOUS Iberica, SA, Spain) while performing McKenzie exercises. The specific program will consist of a conventional low-frequency, high-phase duration TENS (80 Hz/200 μs) applied directly to the cervical area using four electrodes (5x5 cm) at the bilateral paravertebral level. In patients who present radicular pain, the electrodes will be placed along the path of the affected nerve.

Other: Face to Face Program

Face to Face Program

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients will be instructed in the therapeutic approach through a face to face program using a portable TENS (Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation) with a specific program for cervical pain (ENRAF NONIOUS Iberica, SA, Spain) while performing McKenzie exercises. The specific program will consist of a conventional low-frequency, high-phase duration TENS (80 Hz/200 μs) applied directly to the cervical area using four electrodes (5x5 cm) at the bilateral paravertebral level. In patients who present radicular pain, the electrodes will be placed along the path of the affected nerve.

Other: Telerehabilitation Program

Interventions

A support system for the treatment of cervical pain based on Web technologies will be used, accredited as a health website. This system has a structure based on 4 sections: database treatment, database user profiles, recommendations, and feedback/biofeedback procedures. This system allows the registration and introduction of a subject, and modification of a treatment with electroanalgesia and exercises, according to the symptomatic evolution of the pain. It is based on an initial patient assessment system.

Face to Face Program

Electroanalgesia therapy and the McKenzie exercise protocol will be applied by six therapists with more than 10 years of experience in both procedures. This program will be developed in the Health Sciences clinical units of the Universities of Almeria, Granada and Malaga.

Telerehabilitation Program

Eligibility Criteria

Age30 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Male and female patients between the ages of 30 and 65, with a medical diagnosis of cervical pain of non-specific origin,
  • Acceptance and signature of informed consent for voluntary participation in the research study.
  • Not receiving physical therapy.
  • Chronic cervical pain lasting 3 months or more and not receiving any other type of physiotherapy treatment.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients undergoing rehabilitation treatment for pathologies of cervical origin.
  • Patients have osteosynthesis material at the cervical level and/or cardiac complications, epilepsy or tumors.
  • Patients who have undergone radiotherapy in the last 6 months.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Almeria

Almería, Almeria, 04120, Spain

Location

Related Publications (12)

  • Ozden F, Sari Z, Karaman ON, Aydogmus H. The effect of video exercise-based telerehabilitation on clinical outcomes, expectation, satisfaction, and motivation in patients with chronic low back pain. Ir J Med Sci. 2022 Jun;191(3):1229-1239. doi: 10.1007/s11845-021-02727-8. Epub 2021 Aug 6.

  • Hinman RS, Campbell PK, Kimp AJ, Russell T, Foster NE, Kasza J, Harris A, Bennell KL. Telerehabilitation consultations with a physiotherapist for chronic knee pain versus in-person consultations in Australia: the PEAK non-inferiority randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2024 Mar 30;403(10433):1267-1278. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02630-2. Epub 2024 Mar 7.

  • Xiang W, Wang JY, Ji BJ, Li LJ, Xiang H. Effectiveness of Different Telerehabilitation Strategies on Pain and Physical Function in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 4;25:e40735. doi: 10.2196/40735.

  • Lara-Palomo IC, Gil-Martinez E, Ramirez-Garcia JD, Capel-Alcaraz AM, Garcia-Lopez H, Castro-Sanchez AM, Antequera-Soler E. Efficacy of e-Health Interventions in Patients with Chronic Low-Back Pain: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. Telemed J E Health. 2022 Dec;28(12):1734-1752. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2021.0599. Epub 2022 May 9.

  • Villatoro-Luque FJ, Rodriguez-Almagro D, Aibar-Almazan A, Fernandez-Carnero S, Pecos-Martin D, Ibanez-Vera AJ, Castro-Martin E, Achalandabaso-Ochoa A. Telerehabilitation for the treatment in chronic low back pain: A randomized controlled trial. J Telemed Telecare. 2025 Jun;31(5):637-646. doi: 10.1177/1357633X231195091. Epub 2023 Aug 30.

  • Janela D, Costa F, Molinos M, Moulder RG, Lains J, Francisco GE, Bento V, Cohen SP, Correia FD. Asynchronous and Tailored Digital Rehabilitation of Chronic Shoulder Pain: A Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study. J Pain Res. 2022 Jan 8;15:53-66. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S343308. eCollection 2022.

  • Bobos P, Pereira TV, Pouliopoulou DV, Charakopoulou-Travlou M, Nazari G, MacDermid JC. Which Remote Rehabilitation Interventions Work Best for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain and Depression? A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2024 Jun;54(6):361-376. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2024.12216.

  • Sivertsson J, Sernert N, Ahlund K. Exercise-based telerehabilitation in chronic low back pain - a scoping review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Nov 23;25(1):948. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07952-7.

  • Peterson G, Peolsson A. Efficacy of Neck-Specific Exercise With Internet Support Versus Neck-Specific Exercise at a Physiotherapy Clinic in Chronic Whiplash-Associated Disorders: Multicenter Randomized Controlled Noninferiority Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 20;25:e43888. doi: 10.2196/43888.

  • Nanda U, Luo J, Wonders Q, Pangarkar S. Telerehabilitation for Pain Management. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2021 May;32(2):355-372. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2021.01.002. Epub 2021 Mar 6.

  • Cuenca-Martinez F, Lopez-Bueno L, Suso-Marti L, Varangot-Reille C, Calatayud J, Herranz-Gomez A, Romero-Palau M, Casana J. Implementation of Online Behavior Modification Techniques in the Management of Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 24;11(7):1806. doi: 10.3390/jcm11071806.

  • Castro-Sanchez AM, Sanchez-Ferre C, Munoz-Manzaneda JM, Gomez-Garcia S, Payan-Ibarra CM, Saavedra-Hernandez M, Lara-Palomo IC. Telerehabilitation versus face-to-face programme on electrical stimulation and neck exercises for non-specific neck pain: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2026 Mar 23;16(3):e103742. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103742.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Chronic Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Full Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 12, 2025

First Posted

February 24, 2025

Study Start

June 1, 2025

Primary Completion

December 30, 2025

Study Completion

February 28, 2026

Last Updated

December 22, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

The study data will be available by email at adelaid@ual.es, provided that a reasonable request is made with justification for its scientific use and that citation is guaranteed.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL
Time Frame
Data will be available beginning with the first article publication; ending 5 years following article publication.
Access Criteria
Data will be accessed via the contact email adelaid@ual.es, provided that its scientific use and citation of our protocol are guaranteed. Access provided at no cost, unless repository policies require otherwise.

Locations