Clinial Study of Treatment With Mandibular Advancement Device in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea Across 6 General Hospitals
RACEMADT
Real-World Assessment of Clinical Evidence for Mandibular Advancement Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea
1 other identifier
observational
182
1 country
6
Brief Summary
Study Objectives: To retrospectively study mandibular advancement treatment efficacy using apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and oxygen desaturation index (ODI), in a large cohort of patients, in 'real world' settings across 6 general hospitals. Methods: Diagnosis at 6 Belgian recognised OSA sleepcenters with type-1 polysomnography. After drug-induced sleep endoscopy by Ear-Nose-Troat-specialist, patients with positive effect of mandibular protrusion on reopening the upper airway were referred. The mandibular advancement device (MAD) was fitted in 'maximal comfortable protrusion' minus 2mm. A type-3 home polygraphy with MAD followed titration.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Sep 2021
Typical duration for all trials
6 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 22, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 24, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 24, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 10, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 20, 2025
CompletedFebruary 24, 2025
February 1, 2025
3.1 years
February 10, 2025
February 20, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Respiratory index "apnea-hypopnea index" (AHI)
The first primary outcome is an expected improvement in apnea-hypopnea index (AHI; number of apneas and hypopneas per hour of sleep; a higher AHI means more severe obstructive sleep apnea) upon MAD treatment (MADt). Functional objective outcome measure is the quantification of the effect of MADt on AHI. "Success" is defined as treatment AHI≤15 events/h following the Belgian threshold for reimbursement, and any decrease in baseline AHI.
From enrollment to the control home polygraphy at 3 to 5 months after fitting the MAD
Respiratory index "oxygen desaturation index" (ODI)
The second primary outcome is an expected improvement in respiratory parameter oxygen desaturation index (ODI; number of desaturations per hour of sleep; a higher ODI means a more severe condition) upon MAD treatment (MADt). Functional objective outcome measure is the quantification of the effect of MADt on ODI. "Success" is defined as treatment AHI≤15 events/h following the Belgian threshold for reimbursement, and any decrease in baseline AHI.
From enrollment to the control home polygraphy at 3 to 5 months after fitting the MAD
Obstructive sleep apnea severity
The third primary outcome is an expected improvement in OSA severity category upon MAD treatment (MADt). Categories are defined as AHI 5-14.9/hour = mild OSA; AHI 15-29.9/hour = moderate OSA; and OSA ≥30/hour = severe OSA.
From enrollment to the control home polygraphy at 3 to 5 months after fitting the MAD
Visual analogue score for snoring
The fourth primary outcome is an expected improvement in snoring as reported by the patient. This functional subjective outcome measure quantifies the snoring using a questionnaire with a visual analogue score on loudness of snoring (VAS-snore) with a Likert-scale from 0 (no snoring) up to 10 (partner sleeps in other room). A VAS-snore \> 3/10 represents socially disturbing snoring. The higher the VAS-snore score the louder the snoring is.
From enrollment to the control home polygraphy at 3 to 5 months after fitting the MAD
Epworth Sleepiness Scale
The fifth primary outcome is an expected improvement in daytime sleepiness as reported by the patient. This functional subjective outcome measure quantifies the propensity to fall asleep during daytime activities, using a questionnaire with with the Epworth Sleepiness Score-scale (ESS) from 0 (no propensity to fall asleep) up to 24 (extremely high propensity to fall asleep). An EES-score ≥ 11/24 represents a pathological increased daytime sleepiness. The higher the ESS-score the more pronounce the daytime sleepiness is.
From enrollment to the control home polygraphy at 3 to 5 months after fitting the MAD
Titration
The sixth primary outcome is the amount of titration required at the moment when the control home-polygraphy (HPG) is recorded. The starting position of the MADt was set at the maximal comfortable protrusion (MCP) minus 2mm: first the mandibular maximal protrusive trajectory was measured in millimeters. Next, MCP was determined, being the most forward mandibular protrusion still tolerated by the patient. The actual protrusive position of the MAD at the time of the HPG minus the start position quantifies the amount of protrusion. This result cannot be interpreted in terms of a 'higher' protrusion as a 'better' protrusion since this is a patient specific characteristic, as is the range of mandibular protrusion.
From enrollment to the control home polygraphy at 3 to 5 months after fitting the MAD
Interventions
Results of clinical trials on MADs are regularly published in the international literature but are generally very strongly controlled studies, still far away from being applied in routine daily clinical practice. The current retrospective study evaluates real-world data to determine the extent to which MAD improves both symptoms in patients with OSA. It is estimated that about 3% of newly diagnosed OSA patients are treated with MAD. In the light of new future treatment conventions, health government departments are increasingly demanding real-world data to stimulate knowledge of the relative effectiveness and value of treatments in the management of patients in routine clinical settings.
Eligibility Criteria
patients referred by sleep physicians and after ear-nos-troat-specialist examination, for mandibular advancement treatment in routine clinical settings.
You may qualify if:
- obstructive apnea-hypopnea index ≥ 15 events/h sleep
- complete clinical pathway
You may not qualify if:
- obstructive apnea-hypopnea index \< 15 events/h sleep
- not dental fit
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University Hospital, Antwerplead
- AZ Sint-Maartencollaborator
- AZ Voorkempencollaborator
- AZ Monica Campus Antwerpencollaborator
- Imelda Hospital, Bonheidencollaborator
- Vitazcollaborator
- Heilig Hart Ziekenhuis Liercollaborator
Study Sites (6)
AZ Voorkempen
Malle, Antwerpen, 2390, Belgium
Imelda Ziekenhuis Bonheiden
Bonheiden, Mechelen, 2820, Belgium
VITAZ
Sint-Niklaas, Oost-Vlaanderen, 9100, Belgium
AZ Monica
Antwerp, 2000, Belgium
Heilig Hartziekenhuis Lier
Lier, 2500, Belgium
AZ Sint-Maarten
Mechelen, 2800, Belgium
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marc J BRAEM, DDS, PhD
UZA Afd. Tandheelkunde
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- em. prof. dr.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 10, 2025
First Posted
February 20, 2025
Study Start
September 22, 2021
Primary Completion
October 24, 2024
Study Completion
October 24, 2024
Last Updated
February 24, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share