NCT06835036

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to determine the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) for the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Menstrual Symptom Questionnaire (MSQ), and Functional and Emotional Measure of Dysmenorrhea (FEMD) in patients with primary dysmenorrhea (PwPD).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 10, 2025

Completed
5 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 15, 2025

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 19, 2025

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 3, 2025

Completed
28 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 31, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

September 8, 2025

Status Verified

August 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

February 10, 2025

Last Update Submit

August 30, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

DysmenorrheaMenstruationVisual Analog ScaleMinimal Clinically Important DifferenceROC Curve

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Pain Intensity

    Pain intensity in the lower abdomen, lower back and both thighs will be assessed using a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (excruciating pain). Pain levels were categorised as 0-2 (safe), 3-5 (acceptable) and 6-10 (risky).

    Baseline (On the most painful day of the menstrual cycle before the intervention)

  • Pain Intensity

    Pain intensity in the lower abdomen, lower back and both thighs will be assessed using a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (excruciating pain). Pain levels were categorised as 0-2 (safe), 3-5 (acceptable) and 6-10 (risky).

    After the 4-week intervention (On the most painful day of the first menstrual cycle after the start of the intervention)

  • Pain Intensity

    Pain intensity in the lower abdomen, lower back and both thighs will be assessed using a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (excruciating pain). Pain levels were categorised as 0-2 (safe), 3-5 (acceptable) and 6-10 (risky).

    After the 8-week intervention (On the most painful day of the second menstrual cycle after the start of the intervention)

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Menstrual Symptom Questionnaire (MSQ)

    Baseline (On the most painful day of the menstrual cycle before the intervention)

  • Menstrual Symptom Questionnaire (MSQ)

    After the 4-week intervention (On the most painful day of the first menstrual cycle after the start of the intervention)

  • Menstrual Symptom Questionnaire (MSQ)

    After the 8-week intervention (On the most painful day of the second menstrual cycle after the start of the intervention)

  • Functional and Emotional Measure of Dysmenorrhea (FEMD)

    Baseline (On the most painful day of the menstrual cycle before the intervention)

  • Functional and Emotional Measure of Dysmenorrhea (FEMD)

    After the 4-week intervention (On the most painful day of the first menstrual cycle after the start of the intervention)

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Exercise Treatment

EXPERIMENTAL

Each patient will receive a treatment protocol consisting of warm-up and functional exercises.

Other: Exercise Treatment

Interventions

In this study, a functional exercise programme will be performed 3 days a week for 8 weeks in three cycles as previously recommended. This programme consisted of a 5-minute warm-up and a 45-minute exercise phase.

Exercise Treatment

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 35 Years
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility DetailsOnly women with primary dysmenorrhea will be included.
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Diagnosis of PD according to the "No. 345-Primary Dysmenorrhea Consensus Guideline",
  • Pain level of three or more according to VAS during activity (moderate to severe pain),
  • Patients aged 18-35 years (when PD becomes more prevalent),
  • Regular menstrual cycle with a duration of 28±7 days,
  • Nulliparity.

You may not qualify if:

  • Historical background of chronic urogenital infections or drug use,
  • Pregnancy,
  • Secondary dysmenorrhoea caused by gynaecological conditions such as endometriosis, adenomyosis and uterine fibroids.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Zeynep Yıldız Kızkın

Artvin, 08000, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (12)

  • Habibi N, Huang MS, Gan WY, Zulida R, Safavi SM. Prevalence of Primary Dysmenorrhea and Factors Associated with Its Intensity Among Undergraduate Students: A Cross-Sectional Study. Pain Manag Nurs. 2015 Dec;16(6):855-61. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2015.07.001. Epub 2015 Aug 29.

    PMID: 26328887BACKGROUND
  • Guy M, Foucher C, Juhel C, Rigaudier F, Mayeux G, Levesque A. Transcutaneous electrical neurostimulation relieves primary dysmenorrhea: A randomized, double-blind clinical study versus placebo. Prog Urol. 2022 Jul;32(7):487-497. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2022.01.005. Epub 2022 Mar 3.

    PMID: 35249825BACKGROUND
  • Chesney MA, Tasto DL. The development of the menstrual symptom questionnaire. Behav Res Ther. 1975 Oct;13(4):237-44. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(75)90028-5. No abstract available.

    PMID: 1238078BACKGROUND
  • Li L, Huangfu L, Chai H, He W, Song H, Zou X, Wang W. Development of a functional and emotional measure of dysmenorrhea (FEMD) in Chinese university women. Health Care Women Int. 2012;33(2):97-108. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2011.603863.

    PMID: 22242651BACKGROUND
  • Husted JA, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, Gladman DD. Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 May;53(5):459-68. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00206-1.

    PMID: 10812317BACKGROUND
  • Burnett M, Lemyre M. No. 345-Primary Dysmenorrhea Consensus Guideline. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2017 Jul;39(7):585-595. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2016.12.023.

    PMID: 28625286BACKGROUND
  • Myles PS. The pain visual analog scale: linear or nonlinear? Anesthesiology. 2004 Mar;100(3):744; author reply 745. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200403000-00042. No abstract available.

    PMID: 15108996BACKGROUND
  • Yahaya Y, Ismail AH, Shamsuddin NH. Primary dysmenorrhoea among reproductive-age women at Kuala Selangor health clinic: Prevalence and factors associated. Med J Malaysia. 2022 Sep;77(5):569-575.

    PMID: 36169068BACKGROUND
  • Lopez-Liria R, Torres-Alamo L, Vega-Ramirez FA, Garcia-Luengo AV, Aguilar-Parra JM, Trigueros-Ramos R, Rocamora-Perez P. Efficacy of Physiotherapy Treatment in Primary Dysmenorrhea: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 23;18(15):7832. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18157832.

    PMID: 34360122BACKGROUND
  • Kirmizigil B, Demiralp C. Effectiveness of functional exercises on pain and sleep quality in patients with primary dysmenorrhea: a randomized clinical trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 Jul;302(1):153-163. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05579-2. Epub 2020 May 15.

    PMID: 32415471BACKGROUND
  • Greco NJ, Anderson AF, Mann BJ, Cole BJ, Farr J, Nissen CW, Irrgang JJ. Responsiveness of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form in comparison to the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, modified Cincinnati Knee Rating System, and Short Form 36 in patients with focal articular cartilage defects. Am J Sports Med. 2010 May;38(5):891-902. doi: 10.1177/0363546509354163. Epub 2009 Dec 31.

    PMID: 20044494BACKGROUND
  • Lehman LA, Velozo CA. Ability to detect change in patient function: responsiveness designs and methods of calculation. J Hand Ther. 2010 Oct-Dec;23(4):361-70; quiz 371. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2010.05.003. Epub 2010 Jul 17.

    PMID: 20638823BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

PainDysmenorrhea

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsMenstruation DisturbancesPathologic ProcessesPelvic Pain

Study Officials

  • Zeynep Yıldız Kızkın, Dr.

    Artvin Coruh University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: In this prospective study, one treatment group was formed to receive exercise treatment.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Lecturer

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 10, 2025

First Posted

February 19, 2025

Study Start

February 15, 2025

Primary Completion

July 3, 2025

Study Completion

July 31, 2025

Last Updated

September 8, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations