NCT06833424

Brief Summary

This study aims to identify clinical determinants and factors that predict outcome including primary outcome and secondary outcome depending on factors in individual patients with Idiopathic intracranial hypertension treated by Dural venous sinus stenting.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
2mo left

Started Mar 2025

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress89%
Mar 2025Jul 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 13, 2025

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 18, 2025

Completed
11 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2025

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2026

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2026

Expected
Last Updated

February 18, 2025

Status Verified

February 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

February 13, 2025

Last Update Submit

February 17, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

predictors and outcomes

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • change in headache impact scale(HIT-6)

    The Headache Impact Test (HIT) is a tool used to measure the impact headaches have on your ability to function on the job, at school, at home and in social situations. Your score shows you the effect that headaches have on normal daily life and your ability to function. minimum score 36 and maximum score 78

    3, 6 months

  • Papilledema Friesen grading scale

    The Frisen grading system is an objective criteria used to describe the degree of papilledema, which is swelling of the optic disc from increased ICP grading from zero to 5

    3 months and 6 months

  • Visual filed Assessment Perimetry

    Perimetry is the systematic measurement of visual field function (the total area where objects can be seen in the peripheral vision while the eye is focused on a central point).

    3,6 months

  • Changes in other symptoms tinnitus, abducent nerve palsy and Transient visual Obsecuration

    changes in other symptomology including tinnitus ,abducent nerve palsyand TVO

    3,6 months

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Stent Patency and pressure change

    6 months

  • stent Patency

    6 months

  • Safety outcome measures

    10 days

  • Quality of life improvement

    3,6 months

Study Arms (1)

Dural Venous sinus stent

EXPERIMENTAL

40 Patients Diagnosed with idiopathic intracranial hypertension according to modified Dandy Criteria subjected to Dural venous sinus stenting

Procedure: Dural venous sinus stenting

Interventions

40 patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension according to Modified Dandy Criteria will subjected to Dural venous stenting

Dural Venous sinus stent

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients of idiopathic intracranial hypertension subjected to Dural venous sinus stenting met the modified Dandy criteria for (IIH).
  • Signs and symptoms of increased intracranial pressure: Headaches, nausea, vomiting, visual changes, and papilledema.
  • No localizing or focal neurologic signs: Except for possible unilateral or bilateral VI nerve paresis.
  • Elevated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure: Without cytologic or chemical abnormalities.
  • No etiology for increased intracranial pressure: On neuroimaging findings.
  • Age: 18-60 years

You may not qualify if:

  • Age less than or equal to 18 years.
  • severe allergic reaction to iodine contrast or chronic Kidney disease.
  • contraindication to general anesthesia or antiplatelet anticoagulants, Hemorrhagic Diathesis
  • patients with secondary causes of intracranial hypertension: Dural arteriovenous fistula or other arteriovenous lesion affecting cortical venous flow.
  • pregnancy.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Faculty of Medicine

Asyut, 2063045, Egypt

Location

Related Publications (11)

  • Hilvert AM, Gauhar F, Longo M, Grimaudo H, Dugan J, Mummareddy N, Chitale R, Froehler MT, Fusco MR. Venous sinus stenting versus ventriculoperitoneal shunting: comparing clinical outcomes for idiopathic intracranial hypertension. J Neurointerv Surg. 2024 Nov 22;16(12):1264-1267. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2024-022174.

  • McGonigal A, Bone I, Teasdale E. Resolution of transverse sinus stenosis in idiopathic intracranial hypertension after L-P shunt. Neurology. 2004 Feb 10;62(3):514-5. doi: 10.1212/wnl.62.3.514. No abstract available.

  • Subramaniam RM, Tress BM, King JO, Eizenberg N, Mitchell PJ. Transverse sinus septum: a new aetiology of idiopathic intracranial hypertension? Australas Radiol. 2004 Jun;48(2):114-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1673.2004.01269.x.

  • Aguilar-Perez M, Martinez-Moreno R, Kurre W, Wendl C, Bazner H, Ganslandt O, Unsold R, Henkes H. Endovascular treatment of idiopathic intracranial hypertension: retrospective analysis of immediate and long-term results in 51 patients. Neuroradiology. 2017 Mar;59(3):277-287. doi: 10.1007/s00234-017-1783-5. Epub 2017 Mar 2.

  • Saindane AM, Bruce BB, Riggeal BD, Newman NJ, Biousse V. Association of MRI findings and visual outcome in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Aug;201(2):412-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.9638.

  • Degnan AJ, Levy LM. Pseudotumor cerebri: brief review of clinical syndrome and imaging findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011 Dec;32(11):1986-93. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2404. Epub 2011 Jun 16.

  • Brodsky MC, Vaphiades M. Magnetic resonance imaging in pseudotumor cerebri. Ophthalmology. 1998 Sep;105(9):1686-93. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(98)99039-X.

  • Kilgore KP, Lee MS, Leavitt JA, Mokri B, Hodge DO, Frank RD, Chen JJ. Re-evaluating the Incidence of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension in an Era of Increasing Obesity. Ophthalmology. 2017 May;124(5):697-700. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.01.006. Epub 2017 Feb 7.

  • Starke RM, Wang T, Ding D, Durst CR, Crowley RW, Chalouhi N, Hasan DM, Dumont AS, Jabbour P, Liu KC. Endovascular Treatment of Venous Sinus Stenosis in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: Complications, Neurological Outcomes, and Radiographic Results. ScientificWorldJournal. 2015;2015:140408. doi: 10.1155/2015/140408. Epub 2015 Jun 4.

  • Friedman DI, Jacobson DM. Diagnostic criteria for idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Neurology. 2002 Nov 26;59(10):1492-5. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000029570.69134.1b.

  • Radhakrishnan K, Ahlskog JE, Garrity JA, Kurland LT. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Mayo Clin Proc. 1994 Feb;69(2):169-80. doi: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)61045-3.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pseudotumor Cerebri

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Intracranial HypertensionBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System Diseases

Central Study Contacts

Mohamed zayed Zayed, master degree

CONTACT

Ahmed Nasreldein Mohamed, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 13, 2025

First Posted

February 18, 2025

Study Start

March 1, 2025

Primary Completion

March 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Last Updated

February 18, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-02

Locations