NCT06833086

Brief Summary

The aim of the study is to assess the changes in electrical activity of heart atria and in atrioventricular conduction induced by anaesthetic thoracic paravertebral blockade, depending on site on which blockade was performed. Researchers will retrospectively compare ECG recordings of patients that undergone unilateral paravertebral blockade at T3 level with 0.5% ropivacaine. The investigation will include measurement of P wave and PR interval, and subsequent statystical analysis.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2025

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 12, 2025

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 18, 2025

Completed
2 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 20, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 31, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 31, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

April 3, 2025

Status Verified

April 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1 month

First QC Date

February 12, 2025

Last Update Submit

April 1, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

P wavePR intervalPQ intervalP wave dispersionParavertebral blockAtrioventricular conductionRopivacaine

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • P wave time

    difference in milliseconds of P wave time (as a mean from all measured leads) between baseline ECG \[T0\] and ECG after confirmation of sufficient area of sensory block \[T1\]

    from 6 up to 15 minutes (according to time of developement of sufficient block distribution)

  • P wave minimal time

    difference in milliseconds of shortest P wave time (from all measured leads) between baseline ECG \[T0\] and ECG after confirmation of sufficient area of sensory block \[T1\]

    from 6 up to 15 minutes (according to time of developement of sufficient block distribution)

  • P wave maximal time

    difference in milliseconds of longest P wave time (from all measured leads) between baseline ECG \[T0\] and ECG after confirmation of sufficient area of sensory block \[T1\]

    from 6 up to 15 minutes (according to time of developement of sufficient block distribution)

  • PR interval

    difference in milliseconds of PR interval (as a mean from all measured leads) between baseline ECG \[T0\] and ECG after confirmation of sufficient area of sensory block \[T1\]

    from 6 up to 15 minutes (according to time of developement of sufficient block distribution)

  • PR minimal interval

    difference in milliseconds of PR minimal interval (from all measured leads) between baseline ECG \[T0\] and ECG after confirmation of sufficient area of sensory block \[T1\]

    from 6 up to 15 minutes (according to time of developement of sufficient block distribution)

  • PR maximal interval

    difference in milliseconds of PR maximal interval (from all measured leads) between baseline ECG \[T0\] and ECG after confirmation of sufficient area of sensory block \[T1\]

    from 6 up to 15 minutes (according to time of developement of sufficient block distribution)

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • P wave dispersion

    from 6 up to 15 minutes (according to time of developement of sufficient block distribution)

  • P wave index

    from 6 up to 15 minutes (according to time of developement of sufficient block distribution)

  • PR interval dispersion

    from 6 up to 15 minutes (according to time of developement of sufficient block distribution)

Study Arms (2)

L - paravertebral block left

30 woman above 18 years of age qualified for elective breast surgery on the left side of the body

Procedure: Paravertebral block (ropivacaine) left

P - paravertebral block right

30 woman above 18 years of age qualified for elective breast surgery on the right side of the body

Procedure: Paravertebral block (ropivacaine) right

Interventions

Paravertebral block at the level of 3rd thoracic intervertebral space on the left side. 0.5% Ropivacaine 0.3 ml·kg-1, not exceeding 30 ml, based on ideal body weight in obese patients

L - paravertebral block left

Paravertebral block at the level of 3rd thoracic intervertebral space on the right side. 0.5% Ropivacaine 0.3 ml·kg-1, not exceeding 30 ml, based on ideal body weight in obese patients

P - paravertebral block right

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Women above 18 years of age, without severe systemic comorbidities, patients of University Clinical Centre of Medical University of Gdańsk qualified for elective breast surgery

You may qualify if:

  • woman above 18 years of age, legally able of giving informed consent
  • participants previously qualified for elective breast surgery due to neoplasm, with or without axillary node dissection
  • physical status corresponding to class I or II in American Society of Anaesthesiologist classification

You may not qualify if:

  • lack of consent to participation or to regional anaesthesia for planned surgery
  • bilateral operation planned
  • symptomatic circulatory disease at the time of qualification, artificial heart pacemaker presence, positive history of arrythmia
  • allergy to amide local anaesthetics
  • severe deformation of thoracic spine
  • use of medications with "known" or "possible" potential of QT prolongation, according to Arizona Center for Education and Research on Therapeutics \[AZCERT\] Inc. list, in 5 days preceding the intervention

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Gdański Uniwersytet Medyczny

Gdansk, Poland

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Ropivacaine

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AnilidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsAniline CompoundsAmines

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Prof.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 12, 2025

First Posted

February 18, 2025

Study Start

February 20, 2025

Primary Completion

March 31, 2025

Study Completion

March 31, 2025

Last Updated

April 3, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-04

Locations