Comparing a Novel Closed Exposure Technique to a Conventional Method for Palatally Impacted Maxillary Canines
PDC
To Compare the Effectiveness of a Novel Closed Exposure Technique With Removal of Bone Tissue and a Conventional Technique During Treatment of Palatally Impacted Maxillary Canines by Closed Surgical Exposure and Fixed Orthodontic Appliance
1 other identifier
interventional
66
1 country
2
Brief Summary
A multi-center Randomized Clinical Trial, (RCT) on treatment effectiveness of two different closed surgical exposure techniques, one including additional bone removal and a second conventional without removal of additional bone, during treatment of palatally impacted maxillary canines. A comparison between the two methods regarding the anchorage situation for the incisors will be performed as well. Introduction Surgical exposure of impacted maxillary canines together with orthodontic treatment has long been advocated. Closed exposure with placement of an auxiliary attachment with a chain, followed by traction of the canine with orthodontic forces is commonly clinical used to avoid complications with the open procedure (Kokich 2004). Both open and closed methods and orthodontic treatment are one of the most time-consuming orthodontic treatments. Therefore, it is valuable to try to find methods which can reduce the total treatment time and make the treatments as comfortable as possible for the patient. To reduce the treatment time, study I investigates a novel strategy for traction of the canine. Another strategy to reduce the treatment time might be to facilitate the movement of the canine by additional bone removal in the eruption direction out to the alveolar crest. This has been used of a few orthodontists in one clinic for some years. No negative side-effects have been seen. There are, however, no studies for comparison of the two techniques. Aim The primary aims of this Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT) is to evaluate the treatment effectiveness of two different surgical closed exposure techniques of palatally impacted canines before the orthodontic treatment; a) with removal of bone in traction direction and b) without removal of bone in traction direction and to evaluate the anchorage situations. Outcome variables The outcome variables will be: 1) Treatment time for the canine to be exposed in the oral cavity; 2) Treatment time for the canine to be in the dental arch and 3) Treatment time for the canine to have reached the right position in the dental arch. Subjects Sixty-six patients between 10-18- years, will be recruited to the study. Patients with palatally impacted maxillary canines are consecutively recruited at three orthodontic clinics in Lund, Karlshamn and Ängelholm.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2025
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 12, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 18, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 7, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 10, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 10, 2026
ExpectedMay 11, 2025
March 1, 2025
10 months
February 12, 2025
May 9, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Treatment time for the canine to be exposed in the oral cavity
The primary outcome measure for this study is the treatment time required for the palatally impacted maxillary canine to be exposed in the oral cavity. This will be measured in months from the start of the treatment until the canine is visible.
24 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Treatment time for the canine to align and reach its final position
24 months
Other Outcomes (1)
Patient-reported pain and discomfort
24 months
Study Arms (2)
The conventional surgical method
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe conventional surgical method usually used in the clinic
The novel surgical method
EXPERIMENTALAdditional bone removal in intendet direction of tooth movement
Interventions
Additional bone removal in intended direction for tooth movement
The conventional method to use surgery
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with palatally impacted maxillary canine on one side, in sector 2-4 and with angle \<45º are included.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with clefts or syndromes
- Patients with earlier orthodontic treatment
- Patients with canines with angle \>45º (fig.1)
- Patients with canines with impacted canines in sectors 1 or 2
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Malmö Universitylead
- Ortodontilund ABcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Borgska villans specialisttandvård
Lund, Skåne County, 223 55, Sweden
Malmö universitet
Malmo, Skåne County, 214 21, Sweden
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Mikael Sonesson, Docent
Malmö University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 12, 2025
First Posted
February 18, 2025
Study Start
March 7, 2025
Primary Completion
January 10, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 10, 2026
Last Updated
May 11, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share