NCT06833034

Brief Summary

A multi-center Randomized Clinical Trial, (RCT) on treatment effectiveness of two different closed surgical exposure techniques, one including additional bone removal and a second conventional without removal of additional bone, during treatment of palatally impacted maxillary canines. A comparison between the two methods regarding the anchorage situation for the incisors will be performed as well. Introduction Surgical exposure of impacted maxillary canines together with orthodontic treatment has long been advocated. Closed exposure with placement of an auxiliary attachment with a chain, followed by traction of the canine with orthodontic forces is commonly clinical used to avoid complications with the open procedure (Kokich 2004). Both open and closed methods and orthodontic treatment are one of the most time-consuming orthodontic treatments. Therefore, it is valuable to try to find methods which can reduce the total treatment time and make the treatments as comfortable as possible for the patient. To reduce the treatment time, study I investigates a novel strategy for traction of the canine. Another strategy to reduce the treatment time might be to facilitate the movement of the canine by additional bone removal in the eruption direction out to the alveolar crest. This has been used of a few orthodontists in one clinic for some years. No negative side-effects have been seen. There are, however, no studies for comparison of the two techniques. Aim The primary aims of this Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT) is to evaluate the treatment effectiveness of two different surgical closed exposure techniques of palatally impacted canines before the orthodontic treatment; a) with removal of bone in traction direction and b) without removal of bone in traction direction and to evaluate the anchorage situations. Outcome variables The outcome variables will be: 1) Treatment time for the canine to be exposed in the oral cavity; 2) Treatment time for the canine to be in the dental arch and 3) Treatment time for the canine to have reached the right position in the dental arch. Subjects Sixty-six patients between 10-18- years, will be recruited to the study. Patients with palatally impacted maxillary canines are consecutively recruited at three orthodontic clinics in Lund, Karlshamn and Ängelholm.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
66

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
2mo left

Started Mar 2025

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress87%
Mar 2025Jul 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 12, 2025

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 18, 2025

Completed
17 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 7, 2025

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 10, 2026

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 10, 2026

Expected
Last Updated

May 11, 2025

Status Verified

March 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

February 12, 2025

Last Update Submit

May 9, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

impacted maxillary canines

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Treatment time for the canine to be exposed in the oral cavity

    The primary outcome measure for this study is the treatment time required for the palatally impacted maxillary canine to be exposed in the oral cavity. This will be measured in months from the start of the treatment until the canine is visible.

    24 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Treatment time for the canine to align and reach its final position

    24 months

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Patient-reported pain and discomfort

    24 months

Study Arms (2)

The conventional surgical method

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The conventional surgical method usually used in the clinic

Procedure: The novel surgical method

The novel surgical method

EXPERIMENTAL

Additional bone removal in intendet direction of tooth movement

Procedure: The conventional surgical method

Interventions

Additional bone removal in intended direction for tooth movement

The conventional surgical method

The conventional method to use surgery

The novel surgical method

Eligibility Criteria

Age10 Months - 18 Months
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with palatally impacted maxillary canine on one side, in sector 2-4 and with angle \<45º are included.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with clefts or syndromes
  • Patients with earlier orthodontic treatment
  • Patients with canines with angle \>45º (fig.1)
  • Patients with canines with impacted canines in sectors 1 or 2

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Borgska villans specialisttandvård

Lund, Skåne County, 223 55, Sweden

NOT YET RECRUITING

Malmö universitet

Malmo, Skåne County, 214 21, Sweden

RECRUITING

Study Officials

  • Mikael Sonesson, Docent

    Malmö University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Mikael Sonesson, Docent

CONTACT

Katja Hashemi Elses, PhD studnet

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Surgical technique After anesthesia and rising of the mucoperiosteal flap the patients are randomized, by a staff member not involved in the study, for further treatment into one of two groups: A) The conventional surgical procedure without additional bone removal and B) the novel surgical procedure with additional bone removal. In the end of the surgical session, the auxiliary attachment is placed on the crown of the canine and the incision is made on the palatal flap letting the chain protrude exactly where the canine is placed. The flap is then sutured with conventional sutures and the patients are instructed to rinse with Chlorhexidine until the sutures are removed after 10 days at the orthodontic clinic and the chain is activated and followed as normal procedure in the orthodontic treatment. The surgery will be performed by one surgeon. The orthodontic treatment will be performed by four orthodontists at the three orthodontic clinics.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 12, 2025

First Posted

February 18, 2025

Study Start

March 7, 2025

Primary Completion

January 10, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 10, 2026

Last Updated

May 11, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations