Comparing Standard of Care Biopsy System to a Novel Biopsy Needle System by Computational Pathologic Analysis
Comparing a Standard of Care Prostate Biopsy System with a Novel System Using Standard As Well As Computational Pathology Analyses to Measure Clinical and Morphometric Parameters.
1 other identifier
interventional
20
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Prostate biopsy is the definitive examination to establish the diagnosis of prostate cancer, but up to 40% of these biopsies overestimate or underestimate the severity of the disease. A novel biopsy needle system captures substantially more tissue than standard of care needles, but it is important to assess the retrieval of tissue for pathologic analyses. This study will compare quality and quantity of tissue retrieved by both systems. Further, tissue will be analyzed using computational pathology algorithms for atypical small acinar proliferation and Gleason scores in terms of tissue area, tissue length, and tissue tortuosity.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2025
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 22, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 15, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 17, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 10, 2026
CompletedFebruary 17, 2025
January 1, 2025
10 months
January 22, 2025
February 11, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Atypical Small Acinar Proliferation
Presence of suspicious prostate gland cells that appear cancerous but are not definitive enough to diagnose cancer
From enrollment to end of treatment at 1 day
Gleason Score
Pathologist scores the biopsy sample for the percentage of samples with a Gleason score of 7, 8, 9 or 10.
From enrollment to end of treatment at 1 day
Tissue area and length
The amount of tissue retrieved by either biopsy systems-- area and length-- will be measured using computational pathology and compared
From treatment to end of pathology review at 2 days
Tissue toruosity
Tortuosity will be ranked from Tier 1 (high quality) to Tier 4 (low quality) using the computational pathology algorithm.
From treatment to end of pathology review at 2 days
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Standard Pathology versus Computational Pathology Results
From treatment to end of pathology review at 2 days
Study Arms (2)
Test group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe prostate of each subject will have a tissue removed by one needle in one lobe and the other needle in the other lobe.
Single Arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe prostate will be biopsied in one lobe by the control needle biopsy system and the other lobe by the test needle biopsy system.
Interventions
Tissue is collected from the prostate by introducing a needle into the prostate and cutting out a sample
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult males with PSA density greater than or equal to 0.15
- Lesions are visible under MRI
- PIRADS score is greater than or equal to 3
- Able to and willing to provide consent
You may not qualify if:
- Subject has had previous local prostate therapy, focal therapy, brachytherapy, ADT, surgery, or chemotherapy for prostate cancer
- History of dementia, cognitive impairment, or deep vein thrombosis (DVT)
- Is a prisoner currently or has a history of incarceration
- Unable to understand English
- Has metastatic prostate cancer or a tumor stage of T2c, T3, or T4
- Has concurrent malignancies
- Is positive for HIV, HBV, and/or HCV infection
- Has low-performance status
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Uro-1 Medicallead
- Duke Universitycollaborator
- NYU Langone Healthcollaborator
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Ted Belleza
Uro-1 Medical
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 22, 2025
First Posted
February 17, 2025
Study Start
February 15, 2025
Primary Completion
November 30, 2025
Study Completion
January 10, 2026
Last Updated
February 17, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share