Percutaneous Tumor Ablation Vs Partial Nephrectomy for Small Renal Mass: the Impact of Histologic Variant and Tumor Size
CRYO-BO-2021
Percutaneous Tumor Ablation Versus Partial Nephrectomy for Small Renal Mass: the Impact of Histologic Variant and Tumor Size
1 other identifier
observational
955
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The aim, of this study is to investigate recurrence rates in patients with T1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) undergone partial nephrectomy (PN), radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or cryoablation (Cryo).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jan 2007
Longer than P75 for all trials
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 10, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 17, 2025
CompletedFebruary 17, 2025
December 1, 2024
12.5 years
January 10, 2025
February 11, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
1. Disease recurrence of PN vs. RFA vs. Cryo after stratifying according to histological type and tumor size.
No significant differences were recorded concerning the tumor's histology between the three groups. Patient follow-up for ablation was recommended at 3 months with abdominal CEUS and at 6 and 12 months with abdominal and chest CT or MRI followed by yearly intervals. In case of PN, the scheduled follow up included abdominal US at 6 months and abdominal and chest CT or MRI at 12 months, followed by two-yearly intervals. Local recurrence following ablation was defined as new focal enhancement in the ablation bed or enlargement of the ablation defect on follow-up imaging. Local recurrence following PN was defined as a mass in the ipsilateral kidney. Occurrence of metastatic disease was defined as extrarenal disseminated disease, with or without pathologic confirmation. Patients treated with PN experience better RFS rates as compared to both ablative techniques.However, considering patients with non-ccRCC and those with renal mass \< 2cm, both PN and Cryo are valid options.
between January 2007 and July 2019
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Secondary outcome was death due to cause other than RCC (OCM)
between January 2007 and July 2019
Study Arms (3)
localized (cN0 M0) renal mass (cT1) treated with partial nephrectomy
patients with clinically localized (cN0 M0) renal mass (cT1) treated with partial nephrectomy
localized (cN0 M0) renal mass (cT1) treated with percutaneus RFA
patients with clinically localized (cN0 M0) renal mass (cT1) treated with percutaneus RFA
localized (cN0 M0) renal mass (cT1) treated with percutaneous cryo
patients with clinically localized (cN0 M0) renal mass (cT1) treated with percutaneous cryo
Eligibility Criteria
Data from 955 consecutive patients Were retrospectively selected with clinically localized (cN0 M0) renal mass (cT1) treated with PN or percutaneous RFA or percutaneous Cryo between January 2007 and July 2019. During preoperative workout, each patient performed either with abdominal and chest contrast enhanced computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging to stage the disease. Tumor's complexity was defined according to PADUA score.11 Overall, 139 (14.6%) patients were excluded due to incomplete clinical data (Charlson Comorbidity Index \[CCI\], PADUA Score, clinical size of the tumor and age were lacking in 105 \[10.9%\], 75 \[7.8%\], 2 \[0.2%\] and2 \[0.2%\] patients, respectively), resulting in a final population of 816 individuals treated with PN (N.=665), RFA (N.=68) or Cryo (N.=83).
You may qualify if:
- Radiologic diagnosis (CT chest-abdomen or MRI abdomen with contrast medium) of renal neoplasm
- Renal neoplasm of clinical stage T1a (≤4 cm) N0M0
- Age \>18 years
- Informed consent
- Absence of other neoplasm
You may not qualify if:
- Patients refuse partial nephrectomy and/or percutaneous renal CA and are candidates for active surveillance
- Patients who are candidates for radical nephrectomy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lorenzo Bianchi, MD
IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 10, 2025
First Posted
February 17, 2025
Study Start
January 1, 2007
Primary Completion
July 1, 2019
Study Completion
July 1, 2019
Last Updated
February 17, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-12