NCT06829888

Brief Summary

The aim, of this study is to investigate recurrence rates in patients with T1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) undergone partial nephrectomy (PN), radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or cryoablation (Cryo).

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
955

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2007

Longer than P75 for all trials

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2007

Completed
12.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2019

Completed
5.5 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 10, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 17, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

February 17, 2025

Status Verified

December 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

12.5 years

First QC Date

January 10, 2025

Last Update Submit

February 11, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Kidney neoplasmsNephrectomyRadiofrequency ablationCryosurgeryRecurrence

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • 1. Disease recurrence of PN vs. RFA vs. Cryo after stratifying according to histological type and tumor size.

    No significant differences were recorded concerning the tumor's histology between the three groups. Patient follow-up for ablation was recommended at 3 months with abdominal CEUS and at 6 and 12 months with abdominal and chest CT or MRI followed by yearly intervals. In case of PN, the scheduled follow up included abdominal US at 6 months and abdominal and chest CT or MRI at 12 months, followed by two-yearly intervals. Local recurrence following ablation was defined as new focal enhancement in the ablation bed or enlargement of the ablation defect on follow-up imaging. Local recurrence following PN was defined as a mass in the ipsilateral kidney. Occurrence of metastatic disease was defined as extrarenal disseminated disease, with or without pathologic confirmation. Patients treated with PN experience better RFS rates as compared to both ablative techniques.However, considering patients with non-ccRCC and those with renal mass \< 2cm, both PN and Cryo are valid options.

    between January 2007 and July 2019

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Secondary outcome was death due to cause other than RCC (OCM)

    between January 2007 and July 2019

Study Arms (3)

localized (cN0 M0) renal mass (cT1) treated with partial nephrectomy

patients with clinically localized (cN0 M0) renal mass (cT1) treated with partial nephrectomy

localized (cN0 M0) renal mass (cT1) treated with percutaneus RFA

patients with clinically localized (cN0 M0) renal mass (cT1) treated with percutaneus RFA

localized (cN0 M0) renal mass (cT1) treated with percutaneous cryo

patients with clinically localized (cN0 M0) renal mass (cT1) treated with percutaneous cryo

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 82 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Data from 955 consecutive patients Were retrospectively selected with clinically localized (cN0 M0) renal mass (cT1) treated with PN or percutaneous RFA or percutaneous Cryo between January 2007 and July 2019. During preoperative workout, each patient performed either with abdominal and chest contrast enhanced computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging to stage the disease. Tumor's complexity was defined according to PADUA score.11 Overall, 139 (14.6%) patients were excluded due to incomplete clinical data (Charlson Comorbidity Index \[CCI\], PADUA Score, clinical size of the tumor and age were lacking in 105 \[10.9%\], 75 \[7.8%\], 2 \[0.2%\] and2 \[0.2%\] patients, respectively), resulting in a final population of 816 individuals treated with PN (N.=665), RFA (N.=68) or Cryo (N.=83).

You may qualify if:

  • Radiologic diagnosis (CT chest-abdomen or MRI abdomen with contrast medium) of renal neoplasm
  • Renal neoplasm of clinical stage T1a (≤4 cm) N0M0
  • Age \>18 years
  • Informed consent
  • Absence of other neoplasm

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients refuse partial nephrectomy and/or percutaneous renal CA and are candidates for active surveillance
  • Patients who are candidates for radical nephrectomy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsRecurrence

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AdenocarcinomaCarcinomaNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialNeoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasmsUrologic NeoplasmsUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesKidney DiseasesUrologic DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesDisease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Lorenzo Bianchi, MD

    IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 10, 2025

First Posted

February 17, 2025

Study Start

January 1, 2007

Primary Completion

July 1, 2019

Study Completion

July 1, 2019

Last Updated

February 17, 2025

Record last verified: 2024-12