NCT06829706

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to validate the effectiveness of the modified olfactory training device, the main questions it aims to answer are: Is the modified olfactory training device effective in treating patients with post-viral olfactory dysfunction? Compared to the conventional device, how efficient is the modified olfactory training device for improving olfactory function?

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
150

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
12mo left

Started Mar 2025

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress52%
Mar 2025May 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 6, 2025

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 17, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 22, 2025

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 22, 2027

Expected
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 22, 2027

Last Updated

February 17, 2025

Status Verified

February 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

February 6, 2025

Last Update Submit

February 13, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Olfactory TrainingModified Olfactory Training DevicePost Viral Olfactory Dysfunction (PVOD)

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The total scores in the "Sniffin 'Sticks" test

    This olfactory test consists of three subtests that respectively measure odor threshold (T), odor discrimination (D), and odor identification (I). Each subtest has a maximum score of 16, and the sum of the scores from the three subtests provides the global olfactory score (TDI score; Threshold, Discrimination, Identification) with a maximum of 48 points. Patients with a TDI composite score≥30.5 are defined as normosmic. In contrast, those with a TDI composite score between 16.5 and 30.5 are defined as hyposmic, and patients with a TDI composite score\<16.5 are defined as functionally anosmic. Based on previous literature, we have established a 5.5 points improvement in the TDI composite score as a significant change.

    Baseline,Month 3,Month 6,Month 12,Month 24

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • OB volume and shape measurement

    Baseline,Month 3,Month 6,Month 12,Month 24

  • MRI volumetric evaluation related to GM

    Baseline,Month 3,Month 6,Month 12,Month 24

  • MRI volumetric evaluation related to WM

    Baseline,Month 3,Month 6,Month 12,Month 24

  • MRI volumetric evaluation related to CSF

    Baseline,Month 3,Month 6,Month 12,Month 24

  • Event-related potentials (ERPs)

    Baseline,Month 3,Month 6,Month 12,Month 24

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

The Conventional olfactory training

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients allocated to the COT group are told to expose themselves twice daily to four odors (phenyl ethyl alcohol: rose, menthol: mint, citronellal: lemon, and eugenol: cloves),which are placed in four brown glass jars (total volume 50 mL) with one of the four odors in each (1 mL each, soaked in cotton pads to prevent spilling). All jars are labeled with the odor name. Olfactory training includes exposure to odorants twice per day for 5 minutes. Every olfactory session included rotated exposure to each odorant for 10 seconds each, with time intervals of 10 seconds between odors. The resting order of the four odors is mint-rose-lemon-clove. Patients were advised to sniff the odors in the morning before breakfast and in the evening before bedtime.

Device: Conventional olfactory training device

The Control group

SHAM COMPARATOR

The COT group will differ solely with regard to the ingredients contained in the training jars given to the participants. Whereas in the COT group, the training jars will contain the active odors previously selected, in the placebo group, the training jars will be filled with a placebo odorless solvent (propylene glycol). To increase the overall compliance and to ascertain that the placebo (odorless) group remains blinded to the treatment allocation, all patients are told that whereas the odors used during the therapy tend to be less strong, and may be insufficiently intense to produce an odor sensation (i.e., subliminal odors), they are intense enough to be perceived by the brain and may influence mental processes and behavior. The training will last for 12 weeks. After the study completion, all participants will be individually contacted and their group allocations will be revealed. All patients will be offered the possibility of performing or continuing a training with odors.

Device: Conventional olfactory training device with placebo

The Modified olfactory training

EXPERIMENTAL

When the patient is doing olfactory training, he/she selects an odor and installs the corresponding odor bottle on the new olfactory training device. Insert the nose end into one nostril, hold the mouth end in the mouth, take a deep breath through the nose, blow out slowly for about 7 seconds, and carefully experience the changes in the nature and intensity of the nasal odor. Immediately remove the device from the nostril and mouth, take a slow, natural breath through the nose for about 3 seconds; Repeat the above operation for a total of three cycles. The operation steps for the other nostril are the same as those above. When both nostrils have finished sniffing the same odor, stop the training, breathe freely, and rest for 10 seconds. Then continue to sniff the next odor and train in the order and method described above. Accordingly, all odors used for the application of MOT were identical to the COT method in terms of the duration and application time of each session.

Device: Modified olfactory training device

Interventions

Conventional olfactory training was designed by Hummel et al. They performed OT using four odors (phenyl ethyl alcohol, rose; eucalyptol, eucalyptus; citronella, lemon; and eugenol, cloves), which are representative of four odor categories on the odor prism proposed by Henning.

The Conventional olfactory training

Participants will use a modified olfactory training device based on expiratory pressure. Its bidirectional airflow and unidirectional pressure characteristics significantly increased the deposition rate of olfactory odors in the olfactory cleft area, making the patient feel stronger in the nasal cavity during olfactory training.

The Modified olfactory training

Based on the traditional olfactory training device, four olfactory odors are replaced by placebo。

The Control group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 18-80 years old, gender not limited.
  • Patients diagnosed with olfactory dysfunction following infections of the upper respiratory tract, as determined by Sniffin' Sticks test (including TDI value test).
  • Voluntarily signs the informed consent form.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with post-traumatic olfactory dysfunction, rhinosinusitis-related dysfunction and olfactory dysfunction caused by other reasons.
  • Patients with concomitant sinonasal disease.
  • Patients with chronic diseases, such as hypertension, diabetes, bronchopneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, etc.
  • Patients with serious coexisting diseases: such as malignant tumors, etc., with a life expectancy of less than 2 years.
  • Patients who cannot tolerate olfactory function testing and treatment.
  • Patients who have taken oral glucocorticoids, antibacterial drugs, anti-leukotrienes, antihistamines, or received olfactory training within four weeks will be excluded.
  • Patients who are receiving treatment that affects olfactory recovery.
  • Patients with smoking habits.
  • Patients who are already or plan to be pregnant.
  • According to the judgment of the researchers, the patient cannot complete this study or cannot comply with the requirements of this study (such as memory or behavior abnormalities, depression, heavy drinking, previous breach of contract).
  • Patients who did not consent for participating in the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Bejing

Beijing, 100191, China

RECRUITING

Related Publications (1)

  • Xie J, Li Y, He H, Liu Y, Chen L, Liu X, Zhao D, Wu D. Randomised trial protocol to assess efficacy of modified olfactory training method for patients with postinfectious olfactory dysfunction. BMJ Open. 2025 Dec 23;15(12):e101183. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101183.

Central Study Contacts

Dawei Wu, MD, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Researcher

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 6, 2025

First Posted

February 17, 2025

Study Start

March 22, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 22, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 22, 2027

Last Updated

February 17, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

We will decide whether to share the individual participant data after the study.

Locations