A Feasibility Study of Psychological First Aid Versus Dialectal Behavioral Intervention in Undergraduate Students With Suicide Risk: A Comparative Crossover Randomized ControlledTrial
1 other identifier
interventional
70
1 country
1
Brief Summary
his feasibility study aims to compare the effectiveness of Psychological First Aid (PFA) and Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) interventions in reducing suicide risk among undergraduate students. The study employs a crossover randomized controlled trial design, allowing participants to experience both interventions at different times.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 9, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 13, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 15, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 15, 2025
CompletedFebruary 13, 2025
February 1, 2025
3 months
February 9, 2025
February 9, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Suicidal Ideation Attributes Scale
It is a brief and reliable tool for assessing the severity of suicidal ideation over the past month, was developed by Van Spijker et al, (2014). It comprises five items that evaluate the frequency of suicidal thoughts, the level of control over these thoughts, proximity to a suicide attempt, the distress caused by the thoughts, and their impact on daily functioning.
3 months
The Attitudes Toward Seeking Professional Psychological Help-Short Form
It is a 10-item scale to evaluate attitudes toward seeking psychological help. Responses are rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating more favourable attitudes and lower stigma associated with mental illness
3 months
Perception of Academic Stress Scale
It was developed by Bedewy, D., \& Gabriel, A. (2015), to measure sources of academic stress among university students. PAS IS an 18-item, 5-point Likert-type questionnaire designed, with a higher score indicating higher academic stress.
3 months
The Brief Resilience Scale
It is a six-item self-report measure designed to assess resilience by Smith et al. (2008), specifically focusing on an individual's ability to bounce back or recover from stress. Unlike other resilience scales emphasizing resources or traits promoting resilience, the BRS directly evaluates recovery and adaptability following stressful events.
3 months
The Self-Compassion Scale
It was developed by Dr. Kristin Neff, is a widely recognized tool designed to measure self-compassion, which encompasses being kind and understanding toward oneself in times of difficulty.
3 months
Study Arms (2)
Intervention
EXPERIMENTALParticipants: Undergraduate students identified as at risk for suicide. Interventions: Participants will receive both PFA and DBT at different times. PFA: Focuses on immediate emotional support and connecting students to resources. DBT: A structured program that teaches coping skills, emotional regulation, and interpersonal effectiveness.
Control
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup A: Begins with PFA followed by DBT. Group B: Begins with DBT followed by PFA.
Interventions
PFA is an immediate, supportive intervention aimed at helping individuals in distress. It focuses on providing emotional support and practical assistance in the aftermath of a crisis. Key Components: Safety and Comfort: Ensuring that participants feel safe and secure in their environment. Active Listening: Engaging in empathetic listening to validate participants' feelings and experiences. Assessment of Needs: Identifying immediate needs and concerns, including emotional and practical aspects. Information and Resources: Providing clear information about available resources, such as mental health services and coping strategies. Encouragement of Social Support: Guiding participants to connect with friends, family, or support groups.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participants in this feasibility study must be undergraduate students aged 18-25 years who are identified as at risk for suicide based on a validated screening tool. They must be currently enrolled in a degree program, able to provide informed consent, and proficient in English.
You may not qualify if:
- Individuals with severe mental illnesses (e.g., schizophrenia, bipolar disorder), those in acute crisis requiring immediate intervention, current substance abuse issues, significant cognitive impairments, prior experience with DBT or similar therapies within the last year, and physical health conditions that could complicate participation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
South Valley Committee
Qina, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr Mahmoud Khedr
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 9, 2025
First Posted
February 13, 2025
Study Start
December 1, 2024
Primary Completion
March 15, 2025
Study Completion
March 15, 2025
Last Updated
February 13, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-02