Is Adaptive SBRT for Prostate vs Image-guided Radiotherapy a True Evolution (ASPIRE)
ASPIRE
1 other identifier
interventional
320
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The ASPIRE study is a Phase III randomized, single-center study designed to evaluate whether adaptive stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) offers superior clinical benefits compared to standard image-guided SBRT for patients with localized prostate cancer. It aims to explore whether adaptive SBRT can improve urinary outcomes while maintaining effective cancer control. This interventional study is randomized, single-institution, and includes 320 participants with localized prostate cancer. Patients will be stratified based on fractionation schedules (5 vs. 7 fractions), use of rectal spacers, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), and baseline alpha receptor antagonist use. Participants will be randomized to receive either adaptive SBRT or standard image-guided SBRT, with both arms adhering to established dosing protocols. Inclusion criteria includes an age greater than 18 years, diagnosed with localized prostate adenocarcinoma, and an ECOG performance status of 0-1, Eligible for prostate SBRT. The exclusion criteria includes patients who plan for elective nodal irradiation and contraindications to radiotherapy or MRI (for MR-Linac patients).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Feb 2025
Longer than P75 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 26, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 4, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 13, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 4, 2030
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 4, 2030
January 28, 2026
January 1, 2026
5 years
January 26, 2025
January 27, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To determine whether adaptive SBRT can significantly reduce the proportion of patients experiencing a minimal clinically important difference in patient reported urinary domain changes when compared to the non adaptive image guided SBRT group.
To determine whether adaptive SBRT can significantly reduce the proportion of patients experiencing a minimal clinically important difference (MCID; defined as \>10-point change) in patient reported urinary domain changes by EPIC-26 (The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite) questionnaire. within 3-months following radiation when compared to the non-adaptive image guided SBRT group
Within 3 months following radiation therapy
Secondary Outcomes (9)
To determine whether adaptive SBRT to prostate compared to non adaptive image guided SBRT to prostate results in different rates of patient reported outcomes, acute toxicity.
Within 3 months of radiation therapy
To determine whether adaptive SBRT to prostate compared to non adaptive image guided SBRT to prostate results in different rates of patient reported outcomes, acute toxicity.
Within 3 months of radiation therapy
To determine whether adaptive SBRT to prostate compared to non adaptive image guided SBRT to prostate results in different rates of patient reported outcomes, acute toxicity.
Within 3 months of radiation therapy
To determine whether adaptive SBRT to prostate compared to non adaptive image guided SBRT to prostate results in different rates of patient- reported outcomes, acute toxicity.
Within 3 months of radiation therapy
To determine whether adaptive SBRT to prostate compared to non adaptive image guided SBRT to prostate results in different rates of patient- reported outcomes at 2 years, late toxicity.
2 years following radiation.
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (2)
To determine the impact of magnetic resonance-based adaptive SBRT (e.g., MR-Linac) versus CT-based adapted SBRT (e.g., Ethos) across each of the primary and secondary objectives.
within 2 years following radiation
Tertiary endpoints: To determine whether cumulative dosimetric differences between adaptive and non adaptive prostate SBRT correlate with each of the primary and secondary objectives.
within 2 years following radiation
Study Arms (2)
Non-adaptive image-guided SBRT
OTHERPatients will receive prostate SBRT. A dose of either 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions (per PACE-B trial) or 42.7 Gy in 7 fractions (per HYPO-RT-PC trial) will be prescribed as per standard practice at PMH. Patients will receive SBRT every other day, excluding weekends and holidays, as per standard practice. Patients will undergo radiotherapy simulation as per standard practice with CT and MR simulation (or without MR if contraindication).
Adaptive SBRT
OTHERPatients will receive prostate SBRT. A dose of either 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions (per PACE-B trial) or 42.7 Gy in 7 fractions (per HYPO-RT-PC trial) will be prescribed as per standard practice. Patients will receive SBRT every other day, excluding weekends and holidays, as per standard practice. Patients will undergo radiotherapy simulation as per standard practice with CT and MR simulation (or without MR if contraindication).
Interventions
Standard of care SBRT (36.25 Gy in 5 fractions or 42.7 Gy in 7 fractions) for localized prostate cancer, delivered either via an adaptive or a non-adaptive image-guided treatment. Androgen deprivation therapy use and duration is at the discretion of the treating physician and patient, in accordance with standard practice based on patients' prostate cancer risk group.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age \>18 years
- Histologic diagnosis of prostate adenocarcinoma
- Localized prostate cancer
- Low risk, intermediate risk, or high risk allowed
- Patient planned for prostate SBRT
You may not qualify if:
- Planned for elective nodal irradiation
- Contraindications to radiotherapy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Princess Margaret Cancer Center
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9, Canada
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 26, 2025
First Posted
February 13, 2025
Study Start
February 4, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
February 4, 2030
Study Completion (Estimated)
February 4, 2030
Last Updated
January 28, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01