Development and Evaluation of a Growth Mindset Intervention for Adolescents in Youth Custody Frameworks: Pilot Study
1 other identifier
interventional
9
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to develop and evaluate a daily-activity-based intervention aimed at fostering a growth mindset among adolescents in youth custody frameworks and their staff. The study seeks to answer whether this intervention can improve participants' perceptions of their ability to adapt, enhance daily life participation, and identify barriers and facilitators for promoting a growth mindset in this unique population. Using a mixed-methods design, the study includes pre- and post-intervention assessments with the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), structured questionnaires, and focus groups to evaluate the effectiveness of the program.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 11, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 13, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 26, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2025
CompletedJanuary 2, 2026
December 1, 2025
3 months
February 11, 2025
December 29, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM).
This measure evaluates changes in participants' perceptions of their daily task performance and satisfaction before and after the intervention. Scale Details: Scale Title: COPM Performance and Satisfaction Scales Range: 1 to 10 Interpretation: Higher scores indicate better performance and greater satisfaction. Time Frame: Before and after the intervention (approximately 8 weeks).
Before and after the intervention (approximately 8 weeks).
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Analysis of Barriers and Facilitators in the Framework - Customized Survey Scale
Before and after the intervention (approximately 8 weeks).
Study Arms (1)
Growth Mindset Intervention Group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this arm will receive a structured, daily-activity-based intervention designed to promote a growth mindset. The intervention includes: Guided participation in meaningful daily activities tailored to individual needs. Reflective discussions and feedback sessions to reinforce growth mindset principles. Pre- and post-intervention assessments using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) and structured questionnaires. The aim is to enhance psychological adaptation, resilience, and daily life participation among adolescents in youth custody frameworks and their staff.
Interventions
A structured, daily-activity-based intervention program designed to foster a growth mindset among adolescents in youth custody frameworks and their staff. The intervention involves: Guided engagement in practical, meaningful daily activities tailored to individual and group needs. Reflective feedback sessions to reinforce principles of a growth mindset. Pre- and post-intervention assessments using standardized tools, including the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) and structured questionnaires.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adolescents currently residing in youth custody frameworks who are selected by the institution's staff based on their suitability for the study.
- Alumni of youth custody frameworks who are contacted directly by the research team.
You may not qualify if:
- Adolescents whose mental or physical condition prevents them from participating in the study.
- Individuals who are unable to complete questionnaires or reflectively describe their experiences.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Miri Tal-Sabanlead
Study Sites (1)
Alma Boarding School
Ashdod, Israel, 6097000, Israel
Related Publications (4)
Polatajko HJ, Mandich AD, Missiuna C, Miller LT, Macnab JJ, Malloy-Miller T, Kinsella EA. Cognitive orientation to daily occupational performance (CO-OP): part III--the protocol in brief. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2001;20(2-3):107-23.
PMID: 11345506BACKGROUNDBurnette JL, O'Boyle EH, VanEpps EM, Pollack JM, Finkel EJ. Mind-sets matter: a meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self-regulation. Psychol Bull. 2013 May;139(3):655-701. doi: 10.1037/a0029531. Epub 2012 Aug 6.
PMID: 22866678BACKGROUNDBowman J, Mogensen L, Marsland E, Lannin N. The development, content validity and inter-rater reliability of the SMART-Goal Evaluation Method: A standardised method for evaluating clinical goals. Aust Occup Ther J. 2015 Dec;62(6):420-7. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12218. Epub 2015 Aug 19.
PMID: 26286379BACKGROUNDBillingsley, J., Lipsey, N. P., Burnette, J. L., & Pollack, J. M. (2021). Growth mindsets: defining, assessing, and exploring effects on motivation for entrepreneurs and nonentrepreneurs. Current Psychology, 42(11), 8855-8873. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02149-w
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 11, 2025
First Posted
February 13, 2025
Study Start
March 26, 2025
Primary Completion
June 30, 2025
Study Completion
June 30, 2025
Last Updated
January 2, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
IPD will not be shared due to privacy concerns related to the sensitive nature of the data collected from adolescents in youth custody frameworks. Additionally, restrictions imposed by the ethics committee and institutional guidelines prevent the sharing of such data.