NCT06822231

Brief Summary

The goal of this study is determine if a high-tech rehabilitation circuit is more effective than usual rehabilitation methods in improving functional outcome, particularly balance control, for patients with acute neuromuscolar diseases. The main question it aims to answer is: Are high-tech rehabilitation interventions, including robotic systems, virtual reality, and stabilometric platforms, more effective than traditional rehabilitation methods in improving balance, motor function, fatigue levels, sarcopenia, cognitive engagement, and overall quality of life in patients with acute neuromuscular diseases (NMDs)? Researchers will compare a robotic treatment group, that consists in an high-tech rehabilitation, with a control group, that will receive the traditional rehabilitative treatment.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
124

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
6mo left

Started May 2025

Geographic Reach
1 country

8 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress66%
May 2025Nov 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 31, 2025

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 12, 2025

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 28, 2025

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2026

Expected
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2026

Last Updated

March 3, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

January 31, 2025

Last Update Submit

March 2, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

high-tech rehabilitationacute neuromuscular diseasesrobotic platform

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change from baseline in Berg Balance Scale

    Improvement in balance measured by the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), with a target improvement of at least 10 points from baseline to the end of the treatment period. BBS is used to objectively determine a patient's ability (or inability) to safely balance during a series of 14 tasks; each task ranks from 0 to 4, with a total score of 56. Higher score indicates the higher level of function.

    At the end of treatment at day 60

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Change from baseline in Modified Barthel Index

    At day 15, at day 30, at day 45, at day 60

  • Change from baseline in Trunk Control Test

    At day 15, at day 30, at day 45, at day 60

  • Change from baseline in 2-Minute Walk Test

    At day 15, at day 30, at day 45, at day 60

  • Change from baseline in Modified Erasmus GBS Outcome Score

    At the end of treatment at day 60

  • Change from baseline in Handgrip strenght test

    At day 15, at day 30, at day 45, at day 60

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (2)

  • Change from baseline in Insulin Growth Factor 1 and free Insulin Growth Factor 1

    At day 15, at day 30, at day 60

  • Change from baseline in Neurofilament-Light chain

    At day 15, at day 30, at day 60

Study Arms (2)

Robotic treatment group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In this arm, patients will be divided into 3 treatment types based on their Berg Balance Scale (BBS) score at the time of randomization. Phase 1 (BBS \<= 20) involves treatment with a robotic verticalization system (ERIGO) and action observation training with a virtual reality device. Phase 2 (21 \< BBS \< 40) involves treatment with a robotic verticalization system (ERIGO), action observation training with a virtual reality device, and proprioceptive exercises on robotic platforms (e.g. GEA MASTER or PROKIN Technobody). Phase 3 (BBS \>= 41) involves motor and cognitive exercises using virtual reality device, proprioceptive exercises on robotic platforms (e.g. GEA MASTER or PROKIN Technobody), and aerobic exercises on a robotic treadmill (e.g. Walkerview Technobody).

Device: High-tech rehabilitative treatment

Control group

OTHER

The patients will receive the traditional rehabilitative treatment according to the good clinical practice according to the Diagnostic, Therapeutic and Care Pathways of each center involved

Other: Rehabilitation

Interventions

Robotic Verticalization System (e.g., Erigo): Assists in regaining upright posture and mobility. Virtual Reality (e.g., VRRS Evo): Provides an engaging and immersive environment for cognitive and motor exercises. Stabilometric Platform (e.g., Gea Master or Prokin Technobody): Used for balance and postural control training. Treadmill System (e.g., Walkerview Technobody): Used for aerobic exercises with gait analysis and feedback

Robotic treatment group

Traditional rehabilitative treatment

Control group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adults with ages ranging from 18 to 80 years.
  • Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of acute/subacute neuromuscular diseases (e.g. GBS, CIM, CIP)
  • Time of onset ranging from 15 to 30 days
  • Patients with lower limb strength (Medical Research Council or MRC) \>=2 in at least two of the flexor and extensor muscles of the following joints: hip, knee and ankle
  • Possibility of obtaining informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with unstable medical conditions (e.g. severe cardiovascular diseases, such as "New York Heart Association" - NYHA=4, respiratory distress not compensated by ventilation) that could interfere, in the clinician's judgment, with their ability to safely participate in the study or to perform the assessments related to the protocol.
  • Patients currently participating in other clinical trials that could interfere with this study.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (8)

Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri

Bari, 70124, Italy

NOT YET RECRUITING

IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino - Genova

Genova, 16132, Italy

NOT YET RECRUITING

Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Milan Institute

Milan, 20138, Italy

RECRUITING

Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena

Modena, 41126, Italy

NOT YET RECRUITING

Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri

Montescano, 27040, Italy

NOT YET RECRUITING

Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri

Pavia, 27100, Italy

NOT YET RECRUITING

Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus

Roma, 00135, Italy

NOT YET RECRUITING

Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri

Telese Terme, 82037, Italy

NOT YET RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Guillain-Barre Syndrome

Interventions

Rehabilitation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PolyradiculoneuropathyAutoimmune Diseases of the Nervous SystemNervous System DiseasesDemyelinating DiseasesPolyneuropathiesPeripheral Nervous System DiseasesNeuromuscular DiseasesAutoimmune DiseasesImmune System DiseasesPost-Infectious DisordersChronic DiseaseDisease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AftercareContinuity of Patient CarePatient CareTherapeuticsHealth ServicesHealth Care Facilities Workforce and Services

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 31, 2025

First Posted

February 12, 2025

Study Start

May 28, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2026

Last Updated

March 3, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations