Lipomas Treated With Subcutaneous Injections of Cooled or Warmed Sodium Chloride
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Lipomas are benign tumors composed of mature adipose tissue. While harmless, these are the most common type of soft tissue growths with some patients developing numerous lipomas. Patients often seek removal for cosmesis, or symptoms caused by location and/or compression of surrounding structures. This exploratory study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of subcutaneous injections of cooled normal saline as a treatment option for lipomas. The study will assess whether this technique could serve as a viable alternative to existing treatment options, especially compared to topically applied fat-freezing devices. The Investigators propose that this method may offer a more comfortable nonsurgical option for targeted fat reduction, as the cold temperatures are applied directly to the lipomas. Amendment to Protocol Feb 2026- Including and additional ARM of the study to evaluate the effectiveness of subcutaneous injections of warmed normal saline as a treatment option for lipomas.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_1
Started May 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 24, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 11, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 8, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2027
April 29, 2026
April 1, 2026
1.7 years
January 24, 2025
April 23, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (12)
Post-Injection Pain (First Treatment)
Pain is assessed using a scale of 0-10 reported by the patient, with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain ever experienced.
15 minutes post injection (treatment)
Post-Injection Pain (Second Treatment)
Pain is assessed using a scale of 0-10 reported by the patient, with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain ever experienced.
15 minutes post injection (treatment)
Post-Injection Pain (Third Treatment)
Pain is assessed using a scale of 0-10 reported by the patient, with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain ever experienced.
15 minutes post injection (treatment)
Post-Injection Pain (Forth Treatment)
Pain is assessed using a scale of 0-10 reported by the patient, with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain ever experienced.
15 minutes post injection (treatment)
Post-injection erythema (First Treatment)
Post-injection erythema is assessed using a scale of 0-4 as per the Clinical Erythema Assessment grading scale with: 0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild erythema, 3 = moderate erythema, and 4 = severe erythema. The higher score indicates a worse outcome.
15 minutes post injection (treatment)
Post-injection erythema (Second Treatment)
Post-injection erythema is assessed using a scale of 0-4 as per the Clinical Erythema Assessment grading scale with: 0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild erythema, 3 = moderate erythema, and 4 = severe erythema. The higher score indicates a worse outcome.
15 minutes post injection (treatment)
Post-injection erythema (Third Treatment)
Post-injection erythema is assessed using a scale of 0-4 as per the Clinical Erythema Assessment grading scale with: 0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild erythema, 3 = moderate erythema, and 4 = severe erythema. The higher score indicates a worse outcome.
15 minutes post injection (treatment)
Post-injection erythema (Forth Treatment)
Post-injection erythema is assessed using a scale of 0-4 as per the Clinical Erythema Assessment grading scale with: 0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild erythema, 3 = moderate erythema, and 4 = severe erythema. The higher score indicates a worse outcome.
15 minutes post injection (treatment)
Change in Lipoma Size (Second Treatment)
Change in Lipoma Size from the First Treatment (Baseline) to the Second Treatment. There is a 4 week interval between each treatment. Lipoma size is assessed using approximate lipoma area (cm × cm) determined by ultrasound, with the final percentage change being the following quotient: \[(final area - initial area) ÷ initial area\] × 100.
Baseline to Second Treatment (4-week interval between treatments)
Change in Lipoma Size (Third Treatment)
Change in Lipoma Size from the First Treatment (Baseline) to the Third Treatment. Lipoma size is assessed using approximate lipoma area (cm × cm) determined by ultrasound, with the final percentage change being the following quotient: \[(final area - initial area) ÷ initial area\] × 100.
Baseline to Third Treatment (4-week interval between treatments)
Change in Lipoma Size (Forth Treatment)
Change in Lipoma Size from the First Treatment (Baseline) to the Forth Treatment. Lipoma size is assessed using approximate lipoma area (cm × cm) determined by ultrasound, with the final percentage change being the following quotient: \[(final area - initial area) ÷ initial area\] × 100.
Baseline to Forth Treatment (4-week interval between treatments)
Change in Lipoma Size (12 weeks following the Fourth Treatment)
Change in Lipoma Size from the First Treatment (Baseline) to 12 weeks following the Fourth Treatment. Lipoma size is assessed using approximate lipoma area (cm × cm) determined by ultrasound, with the final percentage change being the following quotient: \[(final area - initial area) ÷ initial area\] × 100.
From Baseline to 12 weeks following the Fourth Treatment
Study Arms (2)
Cooled Sodium Chloride Injection
EXPERIMENTALInjection of a solution containing sterile, cooled 0.9% sodium chloride and 1% lidocaine with epinephrine (1:100,000). Each patient will receive a volume of solution equal to three times the estimated volume of the lipoma; the first cc of the injection will be lidocaine with epinephrine, and the remainder will be sterile normal saline. The solution will be cooled using an ice/saline bath at -1°C. Following the injection, the lipoma will be gently massaged for one minute to distribute the saline evenly.
Warmed Sodium Chloride Injection
EXPERIMENTALInjection of a solution containing sterile, warm 0.9% sodium chloride and 1% lidocaine with epinephrine (1:100,000). Each patient will receive a volume of solution equal to three times the estimated volume of the lipoma; the first cc of the injection will be lidocaine with epinephrine, and the remainder will be sterile normal saline. The saline vials and syringes will both be warmed using a Thermo Fisher Scientific dry bath calibrated to 55°C; a precise temperature stability will be achieved by using a mercury thermometer. Following the injection, the lipoma will be gently massaged for one minute to distribute the saline evenly.
Interventions
A 30-gauge, 0.5-inch needle attached to a 3 mL syringe will be used to directly inject the solution transcutaneously into the lipoma. Injection of a solution containing sterile, cooled 0.9% sodium chloride and 1% lidocaine with epinephrine (1:100,000).
A 30-gauge, 0.5-inch needle attached to a 3 mL syringe will be used to directly inject the solution transcutaneously into the lipoma. Injection of a solution containing sterile, warmed 0.9% sodium chloride and 1% lidocaine with epinephrine (1:100,000).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- At least one clinically diagnosed subcutaneous lipoma
You may not qualify if:
- Unable to give informed consent
- Participant has a lipoma on the face
- Lipomas located subfascial or within deep tissue (e.g., intramuscular lipomas)
- Lipomas larger than 10 cm in diameter (fat deposits exceeding 500 mL in volume)
- Rapidly growing lipomas
- Lipomas exhibiting abnormal ultrasound findings (e.g., complex hyperechoic patterns, internal heterogeneity, or multilobulated appearance)
- Pregnant women
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
West Virginia University
Morgantown, West Virginia, 26505, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jessica Patterson, MD
West Virginia University-Dermatology
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 24, 2025
First Posted
February 11, 2025
Study Start
May 8, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2027
Last Updated
April 29, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04