Comparative Study Between Rezum Therapy in Small and Large Prostates
Four-year Follow-up in Rezum Therapy of Small Prostates in Comparison with Large Prostates. a Prospective Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
178
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigators aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of Rezūm therapy for the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in small and large prostates.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 5, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 10, 2025
CompletedFebruary 12, 2025
February 1, 2025
4 years
February 5, 2025
February 8, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (10)
The Maximum Urinary flow rate (Qmax)
Measurement of The Maximum Urinary flow rate (Qmax) in both groups After 3, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months of operation, the procedure is performed. Qmax is measured by (ml/sec) Normal values are described as a Qmax above 15 ml/sec and below 10 ml/sec is considered abnormal
for each case in both groups the investigator assess Qmax at 3, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months after procedures through study completion, an average of 4 years]
The Quality of Life (QoL)
Measurement of The Quality of Life (QoL) in both groups After 3, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months of operation, the questioner is performed. Minimum :0 means delighted / Maximum : 5 means unhappy
for each case in both groups the investigator assess QoLat 3, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months after procedures through study completion, an average of 4 years]
The Prostatic specific antigen (PSA)
Concentration of The Prostatic specific antigen (PSA) in both groups after 3, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months of operation, the procedure is performed. PSA is measured by ng/ml PSA levels of 4.0 ng/ mL and lower were considered
for each case in both groups the investigator measures PSA at 3, 12, and 24, 36 and 48 months after procedures through study completion, an average of 4 years
The International Prostate Symptom score (IPSS)
Measurement of The International Prostate Symptom score (IPSS) in both groups After 3, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months of operation, the questioner is performed. Minimum :0 / Maximum : 35 Total score: 0-7 Mildly symptomatic; 8-19 moderately symptomatic; 20-35 severely symptomatic
for each case in both groups the investigator assess IPSS at 3, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months after procedures through study completion, an average of 4 years
The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)
Measurement of The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) in both groups After 3, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months of operation, the questioner is performed. The IIEF-5 score is the sum of the ordinal responses to the 5 items.
for each case in both groups the investigator assess IIEF at 3, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months after procedures through study completion, an average of 4 years
The Prostate size
the prostate size was measured by grams by Trans-rectal ultra sound
for each case in both groups the investigator assess prostate size at 12, 24, 36 and 48 months after procedures through study completion, an average of 4 years
The operative time
the operative time was measured by minutes in both groups.
for each case in both groups the investigator assess the time of operation from induction of anaesthesia till the end of the operation through study completion, an average of 4 years
Incidence of The catheter duration post operative
The catheter duration was measured by days in both groups
for each case in both groups the investigator assess the catheter duration from the end of the operation till removal through study completion, an average of 4 years
Post operative hospital stay time
the Post operative hospital stay time was measured by hours in both groups.
for each case in both groups the investigator assess the hospital time from the day of admission of the patient in hospital to do intervention till discharge from hospital through study completion, an average of 4 years
Post operative residual urine (PVR)
PVR was measured by ml by pelvi abdominal ultra sound in both groups. Normal ranges are below 150 ml of urine.
for each case in both groups the investigator assess prostate size at 3, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months after procedures through study completion, an average of 4 years
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Incidence of complications
through four years
Study Arms (2)
BPH patients have small prostates treated with Rezum
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients aged 45-75 years with prostate volumes of 50-80 ml, sexually active, and have severe LUTS treated with Rezum procedure
BPH patients have large prostates treated with Rezum
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients aged 45-75 years with prostate volumes of 80-120 ml, sexually active, and have severe LUTS treated with Rezum procedure
Interventions
minimal invasive technique for treating BPH
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- prostate size 45-75 gm
- sexually active
- mod - sever LUTS
- Q max \< 15
- IPSS \> 15
- failed medical treatment with alpha blockers
You may not qualify if:
- neurogenic bladder
- urethral stricture
- UB stones
- cancer prostate
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The Armed Forces College of Medicine (AFCM)
Cairo, Nozha, 4470351, Egypt
Related Publications (3)
Bole R, Gopalakrishna A, Kuang R, Alamiri J, Yang DY, Helo S, Ziegelmann MJ, Kohler TS. Comparative Postoperative Outcomes of Rezum Prostate Ablation in Patients with Large Versus Small Glands. J Endourol. 2020 Jul;34(7):778-781. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0177. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
PMID: 32408768BACKGROUNDMcVary KT, Rogers T, Roehrborn CG. Rezum Water Vapor Thermal Therapy for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Associated With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: 4-Year Results From Randomized Controlled Study. Urology. 2019 Apr;126:171-179. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.12.041. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
PMID: 30677455BACKGROUNDDixon CM, Cedano ER, Pacik D, Vit V, Varga G, Wagrell L, Larson TR, Mynderse LA. Two-year results after convective radiofrequency water vapor thermal therapy of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. Res Rep Urol. 2016 Nov 21;8:207-216. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S119596. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 27921028BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Mohamed Samir Salem, MD
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- consultatnt doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 5, 2025
First Posted
February 10, 2025
Study Start
January 1, 2021
Primary Completion
January 1, 2025
Study Completion
February 1, 2025
Last Updated
February 12, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share