The "Let's Talk Tech" Tool to Support Decision Making About Technology Use
Mechanistic Study of the "Let's Talk Tech" Dyadic Behavioral Intervention to Support Decision Making About Technology Use
2 other identifiers
interventional
240
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this research is to educate people about different technologies to support care at home when someone is experiencing memory difficulties. "Let's Talk Tech" is a new tool to educate people about technologies commonly used to support care and monitor safety, and help families talk about their feelings about them to understand each other's perspectives. The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if "Let's Talk Tech" helps people feel more prepared to make decisions about technologies. Researchers will compare Let's Talk Tech to usual care (no intervention) to see if Let's Talk Tech increases peoples' preparedness and confidence to make decisions about technologies. Participants will:
- Use the Let's Talk Tech web application together with their study partner that takes up to an hour or do nothing.
- Complete three surveys. The second survey will be taken within 2 weeks of the first and the last survey will be taken 3 months after the first.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 3, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 7, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 10, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2026
CompletedMarch 25, 2025
February 1, 2025
1.1 years
January 3, 2025
March 24, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Preparedness to make technology decisions
Participant rates on a 5-point Likert scale \[1="Strongly agree" to 5="Strongly disagree"\] how much they agree with the statement that they feel prepared to make decisions about technology use for their study partner.
baseline, 2-week post-test and 3 months
Decisional Conflict Scale
The Decisional Conflict Scale is a 16-item scale with 5 response categories \[0= "Strongly agree" to 4="Strongly disagree"\]. Higher scores reflect higher decisional conflict in decision making.
baseline, 2-week post-test and 3 months
Technology awareness
Participant rates on a 5-point Likert scale \[1="Very aware" to 5="Very unaware"\] how aware they are about technologies available to support their partner's care and safety.
baseline and 2-week post-test
Technology understanding
4 items assess perceived understanding of each of 4 technologies featured in the intervention \[1="Not at all" to 5="Completely"\].
baseline and 2-week post-test
Perception of PLWD/MCI's technology understanding
4 items assess care partner's perception of how well their study partner understands of each of 4 technologies featured in the intervention \[1="Not at all" to 5="Completely"\].
baseline and 2-week post-test
Satisfaction with dyadic communication about technology
Participant rates on a 5-point Likert scale \[1="Very satisfied" to 5="Very dissatisfied"\] how satisfied they are with their discussion with their study partner about using technology to support their care or safety.
baseline and 2-week post-test
Intention to honor preferences
Participant rates on a 5-point Likert scale \[1="Very likely" to 5="Very unlikely"\] how likely they are to honor their partner's preferences for how technology is used in their care.
baseline and 2-week post-test
Dyadic alignment about technology use
Participant is asked how much they agree with their partner about using technologies to support their care \[1="Not at all" to 5="Completely"\].
baseline and 2-week post-test
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Shared technology preferences
baseline, 2-week post-test and 3 months
Confidence preferences will be honored
baseline, 2-week post-test and 3 months
Study Arms (2)
Let's Talk Tech intervention
EXPERIMENTALThe intervention group will complete the single use self-administered Let's Talk Tech intervention together as a dyad.
Usual care
NO INTERVENTIONThis control group will receive usual care, which means they will complete no intervention.
Interventions
Let's Talk Tech is a self-administered dyadic education and communication tool delivered as a web application to support shared decision making about technology use.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- have mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or mild dementia
- age 55 or older
- able to understand and speak English
- be identified by the patient as their primary support person
- age 18 or older
- able to understand and speak English
- able to complete LTT together with their study partner at the same time
You may not qualify if:
- None
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Washingtonlead
- National Institute on Aging (NIA)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, 98105, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Clara Berridge, PhD
University of Washington
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor: School of Social Work
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 3, 2025
First Posted
February 10, 2025
Study Start
February 7, 2025
Primary Completion
April 1, 2026
Study Completion
April 1, 2026
Last Updated
March 25, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share