Effect of Cognitive Behavioral Play Intervention and Epilepsy
The Effects of Cognitive Behavioral Play Intervention on the Quality of Life of Children With Childhood-onset Epileptic Syndromes."
1 other identifier
interventional
52
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Play Therapy interventions in patients with epilepsy. Children with epilepsy will be randomly assigned to one of two intervention conditions: the experimental group will receive cognitive-behavioral play intervention, while the control group will engage in free play. Assessments will be done at the start (T0) and end (T1) of the intervention, measuring behaviors, coping strategies, positive thinking, problem-solving, and quality of life.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 7, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 10, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 7, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2026
ExpectedFebruary 7, 2025
January 1, 2025
12 months
January 10, 2025
February 3, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
effect of cognitive behavioral play intervention on quality of life
To assess whether there is an improvement in the quality of life in children with epilepsy following a cognitive-behavioral play intervention , and whether these improvements are greater in this group compared to the control group. The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Epilepsy Module will be used to measure the variable targeted by the intervention. The questionnaire uses a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (Never a problem) to 4 (Almost always a problem) for child and parent-report forms. For overall scores, it's possible to calculate a summary score with a range from 0 (worst possible health-related quality of life) to 100 (best possible health-related quality of life). Higher scores on the PedsQL Epilepsy Module indicate a better outcome, reflecting better health-related quality of life. Lower scores suggest a worse outcome.
2 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
effect of cognitive behavioral play intervention on coping strategies
2 months
effect of cognitive behavioral play intervention on positive thinking
2 months
Study Arms (2)
Experimental condition cognitive behavioral play intervention CBPI
EXPERIMENTALIn the CBPI condition, children are given dolls and miniature props to play with, aiming to promote positive thinking. Each session includes stories on health, emotional well-being, social activities, and school life. The researcher teaches problem-solving by modeling steps like identifying the problem, generating solutions, evaluating them, and choosing the best solution. In each session, the researcher models the process four times and makes positive affirmations. The CBPI intervention and the free play control condition are similar, with both groups engaging in pretend play. The researcher uses standardized prompts and spends equal time and attention with each child. The key difference is that in the CBPI intervention, the researcher uses dolls to model positive thinking and problem-solving, while encouraging children's imagination and emotional expression. Techniques from play therapy are used to help children integrate their feelings into the stories
control condition of free playFP
NO INTERVENTIONThe free play (FP) control condition allows the researcher to assess the effects of pretend play and provide positive attention to children. Children in this condition receive the same dolls and props, and hear the same stories as those in the cognitive-behavioral play intervention. After each story, they are encouraged to create their own story, but are free to play as they wish, often engaging in play unrelated to the story prompt. The researcher follows the child's lead, offering positive attention and non-specific praise but does not guide the play. The main difference between the two conditions is that in the FP condition, the researcher provides attention without directing the play, while in the intervention condition, the researcher actively guides the child's play to model problem-solving and positive thinking.
Interventions
In the CBPI condition, children use dolls and miniature props to engage in play aimed at fostering positive thinking, a key element of quality of life. Each session includes stories on health, emotional well-being, social interactions, and school activities. The researcher demonstrates problem-solving steps, such as identifying and evaluating solutions, repeating this process three times. In each session, the researcher models problem-solving four times and provides at least five positive affirmations. Both the CBPI intervention and the free play control condition are similar, with the researcher using standardized prompts and providing equal time and positive attention. The key difference is that in the CBPI condition, the researcher models positive thinking and problem-solving, while in the free play condition, the researcher follows the child's lead without guiding play.
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Children with epilepsy in comorbidity with cognitive disabilities (the relevant cognitive disabilities must be specified with IQ scores)
- reduced visual or expressive hearing acuity (visually impaired or deaf) will be excluded.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Child Neuropsichiatry
Pavia, 27100, Italy
Related Publications (1)
Specchio N, Wirrell EC, Scheffer IE, Nabbout R, Riney K, Samia P, Guerreiro M, Gwer S, Zuberi SM, Wilmshurst JM, Yozawitz E, Pressler R, Hirsch E, Wiebe S, Cross HJ, Perucca E, Moshe SL, Tinuper P, Auvin S. International League Against Epilepsy classification and definition of epilepsy syndromes with onset in childhood: Position paper by the ILAE Task Force on Nosology and Definitions. Epilepsia. 2022 Jun;63(6):1398-1442. doi: 10.1111/epi.17241. Epub 2022 May 3.
PMID: 35503717BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
martina paola p zanaboni, psy
IRCCS Mondino Foundation
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The person responsible for enrollment and the one responsible for pre- and post-intervention evaluations of participants will be blinded (single-blind) to the assignment to intervention conditions. Unblinding of the intervention condition may occur in the case of adverse clinical conditions that may arise during the study or due to the participants' early withdrawal from the study at their personal request. The person responsible for randomization and statistical analyses, as well as those who will administer the treatments, will be aware of the participants' assignment condition.
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 10, 2025
First Posted
February 7, 2025
Study Start
October 7, 2024
Primary Completion
October 1, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2026
Last Updated
February 7, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share