Efficacy of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Temporomandibular Disorders.
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Temporomandibular disorder (TMD) refers to a group of musculoskeletal conditions that affect the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), the masticatory muscles, and the associated structures. It is assumed that 30 to 40% of cases of acute painful TMD becomes chronic. Chronic pain is a significant public health problem, affecting professional and social activities, emotional state, and quality of life. The pathophysiological mechanisms involved in chronic orofacial pain are complex and multifaceted and not yet fully understood. The coexistence of psychological factors associated with vast peripheral and central mechanisms makes chronic orofacial pain treatment a complex challenge. Due to the complexity of chronic TMDs, some patients remain refractory to current therapeutic methods. Thus, several efforts have been made to develop therapies aimed at the treatment of neuroplastic changes induced by chronic pain. In this sense, transcranial stimulation methods appear to be a promising technique. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive, safe, and approved treatment for clinical use in psychiatric disorders such as depression and chronic pain. Given the above, it is necessary to develop studies to investigate the TMS effectiveness in chronic TMD. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with chronic temporomandibular disorders. An additional objective is to determine possible predictors for treatment success based on the assessment of functional brain connectivity and psychosocial characteristics.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2024
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 3, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 6, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 30, 2027
February 13, 2025
January 1, 2025
3 years
February 3, 2025
February 10, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Pain intensity
Visual Analogue Scale Visual Analogue Scale ranges from 0 to 10 and consists of a 100 mm horizontal line. The left end is labeled 'No pain,' while the right end is marked 'Worst pain imaginable
Primary outcomes will be assessed before and after all TMS sessions. Follow-up will be carried out one week, two weeks, and 1 month after treatment.
Functional limitation
Visual Analogue Scale The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ranges from 0 to 10 and consists of a 100 mm horizontal line. The left end is labeled 'No functional limitation,' while the right end is marked 'Worst functional limitation imaginable.
Primary outcomes will be assessed before and after all TMS sessions. Follow-up will be carried out one week, two weeks, and 1 month after treatment.
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Disability associated with pain
Change from baseline to mid-treatment, immediately after the last simulated or active TMS session, and follow-up will be carried out one week, 15 days and 1 month after the end of treatment.
Depression
Change from baseline to mid-treatment, immediately after the last simulated or active TMS session, and follow-up will be carried out one week, 15 days and 1 month after the end of treatment.
Anxiety
Change from baseline to mid-treatment, immediately after the last simulated or active TMS session, and follow-up will be carried out one week, 15 days and 1 month after the end of treatment.
Central sensitization
hange from baseline to mid-treatment, immediately after the last simulated or active TMS session, and follow-up will be carried out one week, 15 days and 1 month after the end of treatment.
Quality of Life
Change from baseline to mid-treatment, immediately after the last simulated or active TMS session, and follow-up will be carried out one week, 15 days and 1 month after the end of treatment.
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Active rTMS
ACTIVE COMPARATORRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over motor cortex.
Sham rTMS
SHAM COMPARATORSham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over motor cortex.
Interventions
Repetitive TMS will be applied at 10Hz on the motor cortex. The protocol consists of 2000 pulses per session and an intensity of 90% of the resting motor threshold. There will be 10 sessions with a minimum interval of 24 hours and a maximum of 72 hours. A figure-8 coil will be used.
The sham TMS will have the same visual and sound characteristics, but without the passage of the magnetic field to the scalp.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Individuals of both sexes, literate, aged over 18 years with the diagnosis of muscular and/or joint TMD by the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC-TMD).
- Pain duration longer than 6 months.
- Intensity of orofacial pain greater than 5 on the visual analogue scale (VAS).
You may not qualify if:
- Volunteers who present verbal communication impairment due to a neurological disorder, a sequel to a previous illness, or a psychiatric condition.
- Pregnant women
- Individuals with any impediment to MRI: having a pacemaker or implantable defibrillator, cochlear implant, ferromagnetic aneurysm clips, electrodes used for deep brain stimulation, ocular implants, Swan-Ganz catheter, orthopedic prostheses or metallic bodies close to the area of interest.
- Individuals with any contraindication for transcranial magnetic stimulation: have focal or generalized encephalopathies, increased intracranial pressure, and severe heart disease; history of head trauma, epilepsy, and individuals with first-degree relatives diagnosed with idiopathic epilepsy; use of drugs that lower the seizure threshold (tricyclic antidepressants and antipsychotics); chronic use of alcohol or epileptogenic drugs.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Coimbra
Coimbra, 3000-548, Portugal
Related Publications (10)
Okeson JP, de Leeuw R. Differential diagnosis of temporomandibular disorders and other orofacial pain disorders. Dent Clin North Am. 2011 Jan;55(1):105-20. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2010.08.007.
PMID: 21094721BACKGROUNDSchiffman E, Ohrbach R, Truelove E, Look J, Anderson G, Goulet JP, List T, Svensson P, Gonzalez Y, Lobbezoo F, Michelotti A, Brooks SL, Ceusters W, Drangsholt M, Ettlin D, Gaul C, Goldberg LJ, Haythornthwaite JA, Hollender L, Jensen R, John MT, De Laat A, de Leeuw R, Maixner W, van der Meulen M, Murray GM, Nixdorf DR, Palla S, Petersson A, Pionchon P, Smith B, Visscher CM, Zakrzewska J, Dworkin SF; International RDC/TMD Consortium Network, International association for Dental Research; Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group, International Association for the Study of Pain. Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) for Clinical and Research Applications: recommendations of the International RDC/TMD Consortium Network* and Orofacial Pain Special Interest Groupdagger. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2014 Winter;28(1):6-27. doi: 10.11607/jop.1151.
PMID: 24482784BACKGROUNDLovgren A, Haggman-Henrikson B, Visscher CM, Lobbezoo F, Marklund S, Wanman A. Temporomandibular pain and jaw dysfunction at different ages covering the lifespan--A population based study. Eur J Pain. 2016 Apr;20(4):532-40. doi: 10.1002/ejp.755. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
PMID: 26311138BACKGROUNDRammelsberg P, LeResche L, Dworkin S, Mancl L. Longitudinal outcome of temporomandibular disorders: a 5-year epidemiologic study of muscle disorders defined by research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain. 2003 Winter;17(1):9-20.
PMID: 12756926BACKGROUNDCohen SP, Mao J. Neuropathic pain: mechanisms and their clinical implications. BMJ. 2014 Feb 5;348:f7656. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f7656.
PMID: 24500412BACKGROUNDYin Y, He S, Xu J, You W, Li Q, Long J, Luo L, Kemp GJ, Sweeney JA, Li F, Chen S, Gong Q. The neuro-pathophysiology of temporomandibular disorders-related pain: a systematic review of structural and functional MRI studies. J Headache Pain. 2020 Jun 19;21(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s10194-020-01131-4.
PMID: 32560622BACKGROUNDde Souza RF, Lovato da Silva CH, Nasser M, Fedorowicz Z, Al-Muharraqi MA. Interventions for the management of temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Apr 18;2012(4):CD007261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007261.pub2.
PMID: 22513948BACKGROUNDGreene CS, Manfredini D. Transitioning to chronic temporomandibular disorder pain: A combination of patient vulnerabilities and iatrogenesis. J Oral Rehabil. 2021 Sep;48(9):1077-1088. doi: 10.1111/joor.13180. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
PMID: 33966303BACKGROUNDO'Connell NE, Marston L, Spencer S, DeSouza LH, Wand BM. Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for chronic pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 16;3(3):CD008208. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008208.pub4.
PMID: 29547226BACKGROUNDFerreira NR, Junqueira YN, Correa NB, Fonseca EO, Brito NBM, Menezes TA, Magini M, Fidalgo TKS, Ferreira DMTP, de Lima RL, Carvalho AC, DosSantos MF. The efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation for chronic orofacial pain: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2019 Aug 15;14(8):e0221110. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221110. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 31415654BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Miguel Castel-Branco, PhD
ICNAS - Institute of Nuclear Sciences Applied to Health
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Catarina Duarte, PhD
ICNAS - Institute of Nuclear Sciences Applied to Health
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Natália Ferreira, PhD
University of Coimbra
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Full Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 3, 2025
First Posted
February 6, 2025
Study Start
January 1, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 30, 2027
Last Updated
February 13, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share