Investigating the SMA's Role in Speech and Reading Fluency in PWS With rTMS
Investigating the Supplementary Motor Area Role in Speech and Reading Fluency in PWS With rTMS
1 other identifier
interventional
15
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to study how a part of the brain called the supplementary motor area (SMA) is connected to speech and reading fluency in adults who stutter. Researchers will use a method called repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to learn more about this relationship. The main question it aims to answer is:
- Will participants' speech and reading fluency improve when we stimulate the SMA with rTMS? Participants will take part in both placebo rTMS and real rTMS sessions. Participants will:
- Come to the research center for 2 days, with at least a one-week break between visits
- Read 4 passages and speak on 4 topics
- Be video recorded while doing these tasks
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 26, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 5, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 15, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 15, 2025
CompletedFebruary 5, 2025
November 1, 2024
6 months
November 26, 2024
January 30, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Severity of stuttering in speech and reading Day 1 (pre-treatment)
Stuttering severity will be calculated on video recordings taken during speaking and reading tasks. Stuttering Severity Instrument - 4th Edition (SSI-4) scale will be used for this.
Immediately before the treatment (Day 1)
Severity of stuttering in speech and reading Day 1 (post-treatment)
Stuttering severity will be calculated on video recordings taken during speaking and reading tasks. Stuttering Severity Instrument - 4th Edition (SSI-4) scale will be used for this.
Immediately after the treatment (Day 1)
Severity of stuttering in speech and reading Day 2 (pre-treatment)
Stuttering severity will be calculated on video recordings taken during speaking and reading tasks. Stuttering Severity Instrument - 4th Edition (SSI-4) scale will be used for this.
Immediately before the treatment (Day 2)
Severity of stuttering in speech and reading Day 2 (post-treatment)
Stuttering severity will be calculated on video recordings taken during speaking and reading tasks. Stuttering Severity Instrument - 4th Edition (SSI-4) scale will be used for this.
Immediately after the treatment (Day 2)
Study Arms (2)
Real rTMS
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will be included in the real rTMS. Participants will perform speech and reading tasks before and after stimulation.
Sham rTMS
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants will be included in the sham rTMS. Participants will perform speech and reading tasks before and after stimulation.
Interventions
Participants will be included in the real and sham rTMS. Participants will perform speech and reading tasks before and after stimulation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- To be over 18 years of age
- Presence of developmental stuttering
- Being right hand dominant
You may not qualify if:
- Being under 18 years of age
- The presence of a diagnosed brain lesion
- Presence of intracranial metal implantation
- Presence of a speech and language problem other than stuttering
- The presence of a diagnosed neurological disorder
- The presence of a diagnosed psychiatric disorder
- Use of drugs and substances that may affect the central nervous system
- History of epilepsy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
İstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi Dil, Konuşma ve Yutma Terapisi ve Yenilikçi Teknolojiler Merkezi (MEDKOM)
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (9)
Wassermann EM. Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5-7, 1996. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998 Jan;108(1):1-16. doi: 10.1016/s0168-5597(97)00096-8.
PMID: 9474057BACKGROUNDTezel-Bayraktaroglu O, Bayraktaroglu Z, Demirtas-Tatlidede A, Demiralp T, Oge AE. Neuronavigated rTMS inhibition of right pars triangularis anterior in stuttering: Differential effects on reading and speaking. Brain Lang. 2020 Nov;210:104862. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2020.104862. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
PMID: 32979643BACKGROUNDRossi S, Hallett M, Rossini PM, Pascual-Leone A; Safety of TMS Consensus Group. Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Dec;120(12):2008-2039. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.016. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
PMID: 19833552BACKGROUNDNeef NE, Anwander A, Friederici AD. The Neurobiological Grounding of Persistent Stuttering: from Structure to Function. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2015 Sep;15(9):63. doi: 10.1007/s11910-015-0579-4.
PMID: 26228377BACKGROUNDEtchell AC, Civier O, Ballard KJ, Sowman PF. A systematic literature review of neuroimaging research on developmental stuttering between 1995 and 2016. J Fluency Disord. 2018 Mar;55:6-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2017.03.007. Epub 2017 Mar 12.
PMID: 28778745BACKGROUNDBusan P, Del Ben G, Russo LR, Bernardini S, Natarelli G, Arcara G, Manganotti P, Battaglini PP. Stuttering as a matter of delay in neural activation: A combined TMS/EEG study. Clin Neurophysiol. 2019 Jan;130(1):61-76. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.10.005. Epub 2018 Nov 10.
PMID: 30476712BACKGROUNDBusan P. Developmental stuttering and the role of the supplementary motor cortex. J Fluency Disord. 2020 Jun;64:105763. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2020.105763. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
PMID: 32361030BACKGROUNDBrown S, Ingham RJ, Ingham JC, Laird AR, Fox PT. Stuttered and fluent speech production: an ALE meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies. Hum Brain Mapp. 2005 May;25(1):105-17. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20140.
PMID: 15846815BACKGROUNDAlm PA. Stuttering and the basal ganglia circuits: a critical review of possible relations. J Commun Disord. 2004 Jul-Aug;37(4):325-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2004.03.001.
PMID: 15159193BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 26, 2024
First Posted
February 5, 2025
Study Start
January 1, 2025
Primary Completion
June 15, 2025
Study Completion
June 15, 2025
Last Updated
February 5, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- January 2025-January 2026