NCT06809348

Brief Summary

Individuals at high-risk of suicide vary substantially from one another. Over time, risk factors for suicide may change within the same individual. Despite these differences, most treatments for suicidal thoughts assume that the same intervention works equally well for all individuals at high-risk of suicide. Intensive longitudinal data combined with network science, integrated with coaching, could be used to personalize suicide prevention interventions to make them more effective and efficient. This K23 Career Development application involves refining and testing a novel personalized treatment for individuals at high-risk called PeRsonalizEd Clinical Intervention for Suicidal Events or PRECISE. PRECISE leverages idiographic statistical techniques adopted from network science applied to ecological momentary assessment data to inform the tailoring of Safety Planning and skills from Dialectical Behavior Therapy, two existing evidence-based treatments for suicide. In Aim 1, a user-centered design approach will be used to refine PRECISE. Following the refinement of the intervention, informed by data from a case series in Aim 1, the investigators will then conduct a randomized controlled trial comparing two different intensities of personalization. In the low-intensity arm, the 8-week treatment will be tailored based on an initial two-week burst of ecological momentary assessment and one idiographic model. In the high-intensity arm, participants complete eight weeks of ecological momentary assessment and idiographic models are generated between each session. Coaches use the idiographic models to identify an individuals' drivers of suicidal thoughts and conduct behavioral chain analyses to tailor specific skills to then teach, shape, and reinforce in their individual clients. Assessments are completed pre-treatment, 8-weeks post-enrollment, and 16-weeks enrollment. The investigators hypothesize that both arms will demonstrate clinically significant reductions in suicidal ideation, but the high-intensity arm will be superior to the low-intensity arm in reducing ideation. Furthermore, the investigators anticipate that increases in effective emotion regulation skills and reductions in negative affect will account for the decrease in suicidal ideation. As individuals learn more effective emotion regulation strategies, they will experience less distress and thereby lower levels of suicidal ideation. This project is responsive to Objective 3.2 of the NIMH Strategic Plan and is integrated with a mentored research training plan focused on 1) suicide specific rigorous clinical trials, 2) user centered design in digital health, and 3) applications of network science to intensive longitudinal data. The project and training goal will support the Candidate's overarching goal to become a clinician-scientist engaged in independent research on personalized, impactful, rapid acting suicide prevention interventions for at risk adults.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
70

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
46mo left

Started Nov 2025

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress11%
Nov 2025Mar 2030

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 24, 2025

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 5, 2025

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 14, 2025

Completed
4.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2030

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2030

Last Updated

April 29, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

4.3 years

First QC Date

January 24, 2025

Last Update Submit

April 28, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

personalized interventionsintensive longitudinal dataemotion regulationcopingcoping skillsdialectical behavior therapycognitive behavior therapyecological momentary assessmentpersonalized feedbacktechnologycoaching

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Scale for Suicide Ideation

    The Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation (SSI) is a 21-item self-report scale that measure the intensity of suicidal thoughts. The MSSI ranges from 0 \[min\] to 63 \[max\] with higher scores suggesting more severe suicidal ideation.

    From enrollment to the end of the follow-up assessment at 6-months.

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Emotion Reactivity Scale

    From enrollment to the end of the follow-up assessment at 6-months.

  • Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire

    From enrollment to the end of the follow-up assessment at 6-months.

Study Arms (2)

High-Intensity

EXPERIMENTAL

In the high intensity arm, participants will complete all eight weeks of EMA with idiographic models generated between each session. Coaches then shape selection of skills in collaboration with the patient and a treatment plan for the next session will be generated.

Behavioral: PRECISE

Low-Intensity

EXPERIMENTAL

In the low intensity arm, participants will complete only an initial two weeks burst of EMA and GIMME will be run following an initial burst. A treatment plan for the next eight weeks will be generated based on the output.

Behavioral: PRECISE

Interventions

PRECISEBEHAVIORAL

PRECISE includes aspects of several evidence-based approaches, such as Safety Planning and DBT to manage and reduce suicide risk. During the initial visit, staff train participants how to complete EMAs. Participants then complete two weeks of five-times per day EMAs regarding their emotions, emotion regulation strategies as well as SITBs. Following an initial "learning period", participant data is analyzed via GIMME to determine the within-person correlates of SITBs. Data is processed through a real-time pre-programmed data cleaning and analysis script. Coaches then teach a selection of skills in collaboration with the client.

High-IntensityLow-Intensity

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • years old
  • Endorsement of active suicidal ideation on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (\>2 or past month thoughts of killing self or attempt in past month)
  • English fluency
  • Willingness to provide contact information for a key information to be contacted as part of our risk and safety plan.

You may not qualify if:

  • Past year exposure to DBT
  • Moderate/severe substance use disorder within the past thirty days
  • Dementia, mild cognitive impairment and/or traumatic brain injury
  • Lack of capacity to consent to research and/or under conservatorship.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

8980 Villa La Jolla Drive

San Diego, California, 92037, United States

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Suicidal IdeationBehaviorEmotional Regulation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

SuicideSelf-Injurious BehaviorBehavioral SymptomsSelf-ControlSocial Behavior

Central Study Contacts

Kevin S Kuehn, Ph.D.

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Adjunct Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 24, 2025

First Posted

February 5, 2025

Study Start

November 14, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2030

Last Updated

April 29, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

The study data manager will ensure all data is uploaded to the NIMH National Data Archive in accordance with existing guidelines and upload timelines (also see Resource Sharing). Anonymous data may also be uploaded to public repositories (e.g., Open Science Framework, Github) to facilitate data sharing with other researchers and ensure accuracy in reporting results.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
Data will be uploaded to the Open Science Framework by 03/31/2030 and will be shared indefinitely.

Locations