Clinical Study of Acupuncture Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis
Efficacy and Safety of Acupuncture in the Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Knee: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
350
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The main question of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) through a single-blind, randomized controlled trial divided into two groups. Patients in both groups received a total of 24 acupuncture treatments over an 8-week period. The differences in knee NRS score, WOMAC index, walking test, mental health assessment and other indicators between the acupuncture group and the sham acupuncture group before and after treatment were compared to provide high-quality evidence to support the effectiveness of acupuncture in treating KOA.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 16, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 3, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 15, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 5, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 5, 2026
CompletedFebruary 3, 2025
January 1, 2025
11 months
January 16, 2025
January 29, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Numerical rating scale
The NRS is a commonly used pain assessment tool〔42〕, especially for joint pain, such as knee pain. The scale consists of 11 numbers, ranging from 0 to 10, each representing a different level of pain, and the patient chooses the number that best represents his or her current level of pain according to his or her own pain perception.The NRS score is accurate and concise, and was once regarded as the gold standard for pain assessment by the American Pain Society.
For participants who completed baseline enrollment, efficacy observations were made at treatment enrollment, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24.
Secondary Outcomes (7)
WOMAC index
For participants who completed baseline enrollment, efficacy observations were made at treatment enrollment, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24.
40m FPWT
For participants who completed baseline enrollment, efficacy observations were made at treatment enrollment, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24.
RMDQ
For participants who completed baseline enrollment, efficacy observations were made at treatment enrollment, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24.
Depressive condition
For participants who completed baseline enrollment, efficacy observations were made at treatment enrollment, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24.
Anxious situation
For participants who completed baseline enrollment, efficacy observations were made at treatment enrollment, week 4, week 8, week 16, and week 24.
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Treatment group
EXPERIMENTALThe intervention was performed by two licensed acupuncturists with at least 10 years of clinical experience who received two weeks of training in standardized intervention methods prior to the trial. Acupoints location refers to the WHO Standard Acupuncture Point Locations in the Western Pacific Region (WHO Standard)〔41〕.The acupuncture group will receive the following acupoints (Figure 3, Table 2): the affected side of Chize(LU5), Quchi (LI11), Dubi (ST35), Fengshi (GB31), and Xiyangguan (GB33).
Control group
PLACEBO COMPARATORThe device's sham needling operation mimics real needling through appearance and tactile sensation, making it difficult for patients to distinguish, meeting the requirement of blinding and effectively controlling the patients' cognitive bias towards the type of intervention. Patients in the sham acupuncture group received this sham acupuncture intervention, which was designed to ensure that only the actual biological effects of acupuncture differed between the experimental group and the control group, and to exclude the psychological implication effects caused by the patients' expectation effects or the operation itself, so as to enhance the scientific validity and reliability of the research results.
Interventions
The intervention was performed by two licensed acupuncturists with at least 10 years of clinical experience who received two weeks of training in standardized intervention methods prior to the trial. Acupoints location refers to the WHO Standard Acupuncture Point Locations in the Western Pacific Region (WHO Standard)〔41〕.The acupuncture group will receive the following acupoints (Figure 3, Table 2): the affected side of Chize(LU5), Quchi (LI11), Dubi (ST35), Fengshi (GB31), and Xiyangguan (GB33). Needling was performed with 0.30mm x 40mm disposable Huatuo brand sterile acupuncture needles.After the needles were inserted, needle manipulation was performed at all acupuncture points to achieve the sensations of soreness, numbness, distension, and heaviness.Each acupoint was manipulated for about 30 seconds, and the acupuncture treatment was performed for one 30-minute session.
The device's sham needling operation mimics real needling through appearance and tactile sensation, making it difficult for patients to distinguish, meeting the requirement of blinding and effectively controlling the patients' cognitive bias towards the type of intervention. Patients in the sham acupuncture group received this sham acupuncture intervention, which was designed to ensure that only the actual biological effects of acupuncture differed between the experimental group and the control group, and to exclude the psychological implication effects caused by the patients' expectation effects or the operation itself, so as to enhance the scientific validity and reliability of the research results.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- aged 18-70 years old, regardless of gender
- meeting the diagnostic criteria of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) of KOA
- patients with an NRS score of at least greater than 4 for knee pain, and the pain has lasted for at least 3 months
- diagnosed with osteoarthritis of the knee by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or x-ray in the last 3 years
- volunteering to participate in this trial and signing informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with a history of knee surgery
- Patients who had received any physical therapy related to osteoarthritis of the knee, such as corticosteroid injections, acupuncture, or moxibustion, within the past 3 months
- Patients who had a disease that could lead to pain in the knee, such as a fracture, a synovial cyst, or rheumatoid arthritis
- Patients who had a history of knee surgery. or any significant neurological injury
- Prior serious mental illness, organ failure, or malignancy
- Planned knee surgery within the next 3 months
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Affiliated Hospital of Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330004, China
Related Publications (1)
Wu Z, Hu Z, Xu Z, Xiao T, Huang Q, Zhou X, Zhang H, Fu Y. Efficacy and Safety of Acupuncture at Sensitized Acupoints for Knee Osteoarthritis: Protocol for a Multicenter, Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Sep 24;14:e77336. doi: 10.2196/77336.
PMID: 40990366DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Outpatient physicians (X.T and X.Z.X) will perform the initial assessment of the patient, independently enter and collect patient information, and randomize assignment. Patients, outcome assessors and data analysts are not aware of the assignment. The treating physician (W.Z.N) will treat the grouped patients. The statistical analysis team will blind the subgroup assignment and the study. Unblinding will take place at the completion of the trial or at the occurrence of a serious adverse event.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 16, 2025
First Posted
February 3, 2025
Study Start
February 15, 2025
Primary Completion
January 5, 2026
Study Completion
January 5, 2026
Last Updated
February 3, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share