Comparison Between Effectiveness of Different Esthetic Orthodontic Appliances
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of active fixed lingual wire, removable aligners, and lingual braces in managing crowding of the lower anterior teeth resulting from relapse. The study intends to evaluate these interventions concerning the degree of alignment achieved in the lower anterior teeth, treatment duration, patient discomfort, patient acceptance, gingival inflammation and the cost effectiveness.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2021
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 26, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 31, 2025
CompletedJanuary 31, 2025
January 1, 2025
2 years
January 26, 2025
January 26, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Resolution of lower anterior teeth crowding
This outcome was detected through measurement of the mean change in the little irregularity index which is defined as the sum of the linear distances between the anatomical contact points of the mandibular incisors. The little irregularity index will be measured using 3shape ortho analyzer software.
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Treatment Duration
6 months
Patient expectations
6 months
Pain reported on Visual analogue scale
This outcome will be recorded at 8 time points which are: Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6, Day 7 and Day 14.
Gingival inflammation
This outcome will be recorded at 4 timepoints, Pre treatment, 4 weeks after treatment, 12 weeks after treatment, Post treatment or after 6 months of treatment.
Study Arms (3)
Aligners
EXPERIMENTALThe upper and lower arches will be intra orally scanned followed by fabrication of in office aligners for the lower arch using 3shape software.
Lingual braces
EXPERIMENTAL2D lingual braces will be indirectly bonded to the lower anterior teeth from canine to canine.
Active fixed lingual wire
ACTIVE COMPARATORA customized 14 nickel-titanium archwire was placed on the lingual surfaces of the lower anterior teeth and secured through ligature wires passing through the contact points.
Interventions
A customized 14 Niti lingual wire customized to the lingual surface of the lower anterior teeth and secured with ligature wires.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Mild to moderate lower incisors crowding. (Little irregularity index of 3-6 mm)
- Relapse from previous non extraction orthodontic treatment that finished at least 1 year before the study.
- Patient refuses to go through full comprehensive orthodontic treatment.
You may not qualify if:
- Extracted or missing lower incisor or lower canine.
- Orthodontic patients who experienced relapse and were treated with extractions.
- Medically compromised patients.
- Hypersensitivity or allergy to any material involved in the study.
- Patients suffering from any congenital, hereditary or systemic disease.
- Root resorption in lower anterior teeth.
- Carious or fractured lower anterior teeth.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Cairo Univeristy
Giza, Giza Governorate, 12613, Egypt
Related Publications (5)
Franchi L, Giuntoli F, Fortini A, Chiodo BP, Baccetti T. A simplified lingual technique. J Clin Orthod. 2010 Mar;44(3):183-9. No abstract available.
PMID: 20575320BACKGROUNDYu Y, Sun J, Lai W, Wu T, Koshy S, Shi Z. Interventions for managing relapse of the lower front teeth after orthodontic treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 6;2013(9):CD008734. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008734.pub2.
PMID: 24014170BACKGROUNDLiou EJ, Chen LI, Huang CS. Nickel-titanium mandibular bonded lingual 3-3 retainer: for permanent retention and solving relapse of mandibular anterior crowding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001 Apr;119(4):443-9. doi: 10.1067/mod.2001.111397.
PMID: 11298318BACKGROUNDLittle RM, Riedel RA, Artun J. An evaluation of changes in mandibular anterior alignment from 10 to 20 years postretention. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988 May;93(5):423-8. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(88)90102-3.
PMID: 3163221BACKGROUNDLittle RM. The irregularity index: a quantitative score of mandibular anterior alignment. Am J Orthod. 1975 Nov;68(5):554-63. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(75)90086-x.
PMID: 1059332BACKGROUND
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 26, 2025
First Posted
January 31, 2025
Study Start
June 1, 2021
Primary Completion
June 1, 2023
Study Completion
June 1, 2024
Last Updated
January 31, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share