Age-Based and Weight-Based Bupivacaine Dosing for Pediatric Spinal Anesthesia for Elective Infra-Umbilical Surgeries
A Comparative Study Between Age-Based and Weight-Based Bupivacaine Dosing for Pediatric Spinal Anesthesia in Children Undergoing Elective Infra-Umbilical Surgeries: A Randomized Double-Blinded Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
60
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Pediatric anesthesia presents distinctive challenges, particularly concerning appropriate dosage administration of local anesthetics for spinal anesthesia (SA). Spinal anesthesia in infants has been linked to a lower incidence of hypotension, hypoxia, bradycardia, and postoperative apnea in comparison to general anesthesia (GA); ensuring a high level of cardiovascular and respiratory stability. Additionally, SA has been linked to lower operating room time, post-anesthesia care unit, hospital length of stay, corticosteroid administration, narcotic requirements, postoperative emesis, and cardiopulmonary complications in comparison to GA. A reduction in systemic blood pressure frequently accompanies neuraxial blocks in adults, necessitating intervention. Nevertheless, spinal, caudal, or epidural blocks administered to children under six years old are not associated with any substantial alterations in blood pressure. In children aged 6 to 10, there is a linear decrease in blood pressure that will reach a plateau at approximately a 30% decrease in those beyond the age of 10. Conversely, younger children require no additional precautions. Bupivacaine, has a narrow therapeutic index in children, and its dosing requires careful consideration to strike a balance between effective anesthesia and the risk of toxicity. The traditional method of dosing bupivacaine in pediatric spinal anesthesia is based on the child's body weight. This weight-based dosing considers the assumption that children's drug clearance correlates with their body mass. However, this approach might not account for the maturational changes in drug handling by pediatric patients or the variability in spinal column length and cerebrospinal fluid volumes, not always proportional to weight but may evolve with age. Emerging evidence suggests that age-based dosing may be more effective. It hypothesizes that developmental pharmacokinetics, including changes in body composition, organ function, and drug-receptor differences, can influence bupivacaine metabolism and action more significantly than body mass alone. By accounting for the age-related anatomical and physiological changes, age-based dosing could result in more precise and effective anesthesia with a decreased risk of adverse outcomes. To the authors knowledge, there is no study comparing age-based and weight-based bupivacaine dosing for pediatric spinal anesthesia in children undergoing elective infra-umbilical surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Jan 2025
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 25, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 30, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 5, 2025
CompletedJanuary 30, 2025
January 1, 2025
4 months
January 25, 2025
January 25, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The peak sensory level
The sensory level of subarachnoid block, tested by firm skin pinch.
5 mins after intrathecal bupivacaine injection
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Block level time
10 minutes from intrathecal injection of local anesthetic
Duration of the block
120 minutes from intrathecal injection of local anesthetic
Postoperative pain score
3 hours from intrathecal injection of local anesthetic
Incidence of failed spinal blocks
2 hours from attempting subarachnoid block application
Study Arms (2)
Weight-based dosing
ACTIVE COMPARATORHyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% dosage will be calculated and administered intrathecally as 0.4 mg/kg or 0.08 ml/kg if body weight ≤ 15 kg and 0.3 mg/kg or 0.06 ml/kg if body weight \> 15 kg
Age-based dosing group
ACTIVE COMPARATORHyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% will be administered at the dose of age divided by 5 (in ml). The age in months after the completion of a year was noted and considered as the next age if it is more than 6 months and the same age if it is ≤ 6 months.
Interventions
Hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% dosage will be calculated and administered intrathecally as 0.4 mg/kg or 0.08 ml/kg if body weight ≤ 15 kg and 0.3 mg/kg or 0.06 ml/kg if body weight \> 15 kg
Hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% will be administered at the dose of age divided by 5 (in ml). The age in months after the completion of a year was noted and considered as the next age if it is more than 6 months and the same age if it is ≤ 6 months.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ASA I and II
- Both genders
- Elective infra-umbilical surgeries with anticipated duration ≤ 90 minutes.
You may not qualify if:
- Guardian refusal.
- Children with major congenital heart disease, including septal defects.
- Patients with neuromuscular disorders or high intracranial pressure.
- Children with spinal deformities or morbid obesity (BMI above the 99th percentile).
- Children with a history or family history of coagulation disorders.
- Children with local infection at the site of skin puncture for spinal anesthesia.
- Children with known allergy to bupivacaine.
- Surgeries requiring head down (Trendelenburg) or prone position.
- Unexpected prolongation of surgery \> 90 minutes.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Manal M Elgohary, M.D.
Cairo University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Hany M Elhady, M.D.
Cairo University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Kareem MA Nawwar, M.D.
Cairo University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bassant A Heikal, M.B.B.Ch.
Cairo University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Lecturer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 25, 2025
First Posted
January 30, 2025
Study Start
January 30, 2025
Primary Completion
May 30, 2025
Study Completion
June 5, 2025
Last Updated
January 30, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share