NCT06801600

Brief Summary

Pediatric anesthesia presents distinctive challenges, particularly concerning appropriate dosage administration of local anesthetics for spinal anesthesia (SA). Spinal anesthesia in infants has been linked to a lower incidence of hypotension, hypoxia, bradycardia, and postoperative apnea in comparison to general anesthesia (GA); ensuring a high level of cardiovascular and respiratory stability. Additionally, SA has been linked to lower operating room time, post-anesthesia care unit, hospital length of stay, corticosteroid administration, narcotic requirements, postoperative emesis, and cardiopulmonary complications in comparison to GA. A reduction in systemic blood pressure frequently accompanies neuraxial blocks in adults, necessitating intervention. Nevertheless, spinal, caudal, or epidural blocks administered to children under six years old are not associated with any substantial alterations in blood pressure. In children aged 6 to 10, there is a linear decrease in blood pressure that will reach a plateau at approximately a 30% decrease in those beyond the age of 10. Conversely, younger children require no additional precautions. Bupivacaine, has a narrow therapeutic index in children, and its dosing requires careful consideration to strike a balance between effective anesthesia and the risk of toxicity. The traditional method of dosing bupivacaine in pediatric spinal anesthesia is based on the child's body weight. This weight-based dosing considers the assumption that children's drug clearance correlates with their body mass. However, this approach might not account for the maturational changes in drug handling by pediatric patients or the variability in spinal column length and cerebrospinal fluid volumes, not always proportional to weight but may evolve with age. Emerging evidence suggests that age-based dosing may be more effective. It hypothesizes that developmental pharmacokinetics, including changes in body composition, organ function, and drug-receptor differences, can influence bupivacaine metabolism and action more significantly than body mass alone. By accounting for the age-related anatomical and physiological changes, age-based dosing could result in more precise and effective anesthesia with a decreased risk of adverse outcomes. To the authors knowledge, there is no study comparing age-based and weight-based bupivacaine dosing for pediatric spinal anesthesia in children undergoing elective infra-umbilical surgery.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2025

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 25, 2025

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 30, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 30, 2025

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 30, 2025

Completed
6 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 5, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

January 30, 2025

Status Verified

January 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

January 25, 2025

Last Update Submit

January 25, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The peak sensory level

    The sensory level of subarachnoid block, tested by firm skin pinch.

    5 mins after intrathecal bupivacaine injection

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Block level time

    10 minutes from intrathecal injection of local anesthetic

  • Duration of the block

    120 minutes from intrathecal injection of local anesthetic

  • Postoperative pain score

    3 hours from intrathecal injection of local anesthetic

  • Incidence of failed spinal blocks

    2 hours from attempting subarachnoid block application

Study Arms (2)

Weight-based dosing

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% dosage will be calculated and administered intrathecally as 0.4 mg/kg or 0.08 ml/kg if body weight ≤ 15 kg and 0.3 mg/kg or 0.06 ml/kg if body weight \> 15 kg

Drug: Weight-based dosing

Age-based dosing group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% will be administered at the dose of age divided by 5 (in ml). The age in months after the completion of a year was noted and considered as the next age if it is more than 6 months and the same age if it is ≤ 6 months.

Drug: Age-based dosing

Interventions

Hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% dosage will be calculated and administered intrathecally as 0.4 mg/kg or 0.08 ml/kg if body weight ≤ 15 kg and 0.3 mg/kg or 0.06 ml/kg if body weight \> 15 kg

Weight-based dosing

Hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% will be administered at the dose of age divided by 5 (in ml). The age in months after the completion of a year was noted and considered as the next age if it is more than 6 months and the same age if it is ≤ 6 months.

Age-based dosing group

Eligibility Criteria

Age1 Year - 6 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • ASA I and II
  • Both genders
  • Elective infra-umbilical surgeries with anticipated duration ≤ 90 minutes.

You may not qualify if:

  • Guardian refusal.
  • Children with major congenital heart disease, including septal defects.
  • Patients with neuromuscular disorders or high intracranial pressure.
  • Children with spinal deformities or morbid obesity (BMI above the 99th percentile).
  • Children with a history or family history of coagulation disorders.
  • Children with local infection at the site of skin puncture for spinal anesthesia.
  • Children with known allergy to bupivacaine.
  • Surgeries requiring head down (Trendelenburg) or prone position.
  • Unexpected prolongation of surgery \> 90 minutes.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Officials

  • Manal M Elgohary, M.D.

    Cairo University

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Hany M Elhady, M.D.

    Cairo University

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Kareem MA Nawwar, M.D.

    Cairo University

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Bassant A Heikal, M.B.B.Ch.

    Cairo University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Kareem MA Nawwar, M.D.

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Lecturer

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 25, 2025

First Posted

January 30, 2025

Study Start

January 30, 2025

Primary Completion

May 30, 2025

Study Completion

June 5, 2025

Last Updated

January 30, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share