Clinical and Biological Evaluation of NAAGA Versus Azelastine Eye Drops in Allergic Subjects With Tear Film Dysfunction
A Randomized, Single-Blind Clinical Investigation to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of N-Acetyl-Aspartyl-Glutamate (NAAGA) Versus Azelastine Eye Drops in Patients With Allergic Conjunctivitis Associated With Tear Film Dysfunction
1 other identifier
interventional
134
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomized, single-blind study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of N-acetyl-aspartyl-glutamate (NAAGA) and azelastine hydrochloride eye drops in patients with allergic conjunctivitis associated with tear film dysfunction. A total of 134 atopic patients with mild-to-moderate tear film dysfunction were included. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either NAAGA (49 mg/mL, four times daily) or azelastine (0.05%, twice daily) for four weeks. The primary endpoint is the change in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) scores from baseline to week 4. Secondary endpoints include tear osmolarity, Schirmer test results, tear break-up time (TBUT), MMP-9 levels, and corneal staining scores. This study seeks to provide evidence for the tailored management of allergic conjunctivitis and tear film dysfunction.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Apr 2023
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 21, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 28, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 28, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 23, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 29, 2025
CompletedJuly 15, 2025
July 1, 2025
11 months
January 23, 2025
July 10, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Improvement in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Score from Baseline
The OSDI is a validated questionnaire used to measure the severity of dry eye disease and its impact on vision-related quality of life. It includes 12 questions divided into three subscales: ocular symptoms, vision-related functions, and environmental triggers. Each item is scored on a scale from 0 ("none of the time") to 4 ("all of the time"). The total OSDI score is calculated on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater severity. A clinically meaningful change is defined as a decrease of ≥10 points.
Week 4
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Improvement in OSDI Score from Baseline
Week 2
Changes in Tear Osmolarity from Baseline
Week 2 and Week 4
Improvement in Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT) from Baseline
Week 2 and Week 4
Improvement in Schirmer's Test 1 Results from Baseline
Week 2 and Week 4
Reduction in MMP-9 Positivity from Baseline
Week 4
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
NAAGA Group
EXPERIMENTALAzelastine Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
80 patients were randomly assigned to NAAGA in single dose (49 mg/mL), instilled as 1 drop per eye four times daily for four weeks. Specific diagnostic tests and procedures for dry eye disease were performed at week 0 (baseline), week 2 and week 4.
54 patients were randomly assigned to azelastine hydrochloride 0.05% instilled as 1 drop per eye 2 times a day in the conjunctival sac for for four weeks. Specific diagnostic tests and procedures for dry eye disease were performed at week 0 (baseline), week 2 and week 4.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults (≥18 years) with atopy confirmed by skin prick tests, elevated specific IgE levels, or Prist result \>100 kU/L.
- Mild-to-moderate tear film dysfunction defined by OSDI scores ≥13 and at least one diagnostic abnormality (TBUT \<10 sec, Schirmer I test \<10 mm, CLEK score for corneal staining \>1, or tear osmolarity \>308 mOsm/L).
You may not qualify if:
- Severe ocular surface disorders
- Unilateral dry eye syndrome.
- Recent ocular surgery (within 3 months) or refractive surgery (within 6 months).
- Active ocular infections.
- Previous herpetic keratitis.
- Systemic or topic therapies with steroids in the last three months.
- Local therapies in the last 14 days.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria OO.RR. S. Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi D'Aragona
Salerno, Salerno, 84131, Italy
Related Publications (13)
Suarez-Cortes T, Merino-Inda N, Benitez-Del-Castillo JM. Tear and ocular surface disease biomarkers: A diagnostic and clinical perspective for ocular allergies and dry eye disease. Exp Eye Res. 2022 Aug;221:109121. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2022.109121. Epub 2022 May 21.
PMID: 35605673BACKGROUNDShin D, Sang Min J. Comparison of treatment effects between 4.9% N-acetyl-aspartyl glutamic acid and 0.05% cyclosporine A eye drops in dry eye patients. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022 Oct;260(10):3285-3291. doi: 10.1007/s00417-022-05682-x. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
PMID: 35486175BACKGROUNDRegu VR, Swain RP, Subudhi BB. Drug Delivery for Ocular Allergy: Current Formulation Design Strategies and Future Perspectives. Curr Pharm Des. 2023;29(33):2626-2639. doi: 10.2174/0113816128275375231030115828.
PMID: 37936454BACKGROUNDLeonardi A, Quintieri L, Presa IJ, LLoves JM, Montero J, Benitez-Del-Castillo JM, Leston FJS, Gonzalez-Mancebo E, Asero R, Groblewska A, Kuna P. Allergic Conjunctivitis Management: Update on Ophthalmic Solutions. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2024 Jul;24(7):347-360. doi: 10.1007/s11882-024-01150-0. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
PMID: 38869807BACKGROUNDKumar N, Feuer W, Lanza NL, Galor A. Seasonal Variation in Dry Eye. Ophthalmology. 2015 Aug;122(8):1727-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.02.013. Epub 2015 Apr 6. No abstract available.
PMID: 25912217BACKGROUNDJaneczko P, Norris MR, Bielory L. Assessment of receptor affinities of ophthalmic and systemic agents in dry eye disease. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021 Oct 1;21(5):480-485. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000773.
PMID: 34387278BACKGROUNDJames IG, Campbell LM, Harrison JM, Fell PJ, Ellers-Lenz B, Petzold U. Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of topically administered azelastine, sodium cromoglycate and placebo in the treatment of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis and rhino-conjunctivitis. Curr Med Res Opin. 2003;19(4):313-20. doi: 10.1185/030079903125001785.
PMID: 12841924BACKGROUNDJambou D, Lapalus P. Effect of N-acetyl-aspartyl-glutamate (Naaga) on in-vitro leukotriene synthesis by macrophage cell line P388D1. Int J Tissue React. 1990;12(5):273-80.
PMID: 1983004BACKGROUNDHerrero-Vanrell R, Jauregui Presa I, Leceta Bilbao A, Montero-Iruzubieta J. Fundamental Aspects and Relevance of Components in Antihistamine Eye Drops. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2023 Dec;33(6):431-438. doi: 10.18176/jiaci.0963.
PMID: 38095492BACKGROUNDGoldschmidt PL, Vulliez-Le Normand B, Briquet I, Dray F. Effects of N-acetyl-aspartyl glutamic acid and sodium cromoglycate on leukotriene B4 secretion by human leukocytes. Allergy. 1990 Jul;45(5):363-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1990.tb00512.x.
PMID: 2165751BACKGROUNDGarcia-Queiruga J, Pena-Verdeal H, Sabucedo-Villamarin B, Garcia-Resua C, Giraldez MJ, Yebra-Pimentel E. Temporal Progression of Entry Factors into the Vicious Circle of Dry Eye in Untreated Sufferers. Life (Basel). 2024 Jun 26;14(7):806. doi: 10.3390/life14070806.
PMID: 39063561BACKGROUNDFukuda K, Kishimoto T, Sumi T, Yamashiro K, Ebihara N. Biologics for allergy: therapeutic potential for ocular allergic diseases and adverse effects on the eye. Allergol Int. 2023 Apr;72(2):234-244. doi: 10.1016/j.alit.2022.09.005. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
PMID: 36333219BACKGROUNDEl Fekih L, Khairallah M, Ben Amor H, Mahmoud A, Chiambaretta F, Messaoud R. Successful management of dry eye disease with a new eye drop formulation combining hyaluronic acid, trehalose, and N-acetyl-aspartyl-glutamic acid (NAAGA). J Fr Ophtalmol. 2024 Sep;47(7):104169. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2024.104169. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
PMID: 38838456BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mario Troisi, MD
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria OO.RR. S. Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi D'Aragona, Salerno, Italy
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 23, 2025
First Posted
January 29, 2025
Study Start
April 21, 2023
Primary Completion
March 28, 2024
Study Completion
March 28, 2024
Last Updated
July 15, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR