NCT06799819

Brief Summary

Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is a rather long examination (around 2 hours), involving an injection of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), which requires the patient to rest for 1 hour between the injection and the start of imaging. Some hospitals allow the patient to sit, read or use the telephone, but none allow the patient to move freely after injection, hence the interest of this work. The aim of this study is to demonstrate that free mobilization of the patient following 18F-FDG injection does not result in any significant difference in imaging quality (particularly muscular fixations), and therefore a medical interpretation identical to that of a patient who remains at rest.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
284

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
2mo left

Started Apr 2025

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress84%
Apr 2025Sep 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 21, 2025

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 29, 2025

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 30, 2025

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2026

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2026

Last Updated

May 26, 2026

Status Verified

May 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

January 21, 2025

Last Update Submit

May 21, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

FDG PETmuscular uptakeimage qualityDiagnostic Technics and Procedures

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Visual image quality score (in terms of muscle fixations)

    The visual quality of the images will be the main evaluation criterion. An overall examination quality score will be given by the investigator for each patient, using a 3-point Likert scale: 1. no muscular fixation (interpretable examination) 2. some muscular fixations that do not interfere with medical interpretation (interpretable examination) 3. significant muscular fixations that make the examination uninterpretable. The main evaluation criterion will be the proportion of score 1 in the two groups of patients (with and without strict rest), bearing in mind that images scored 3 are very rare.

    Day 0

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Cervical SUV max

    Day 0

  • Lumbosacral SUV max

    Day 0

  • Improving patient comfort

    Day 0

  • Level of stress

    Day 0

  • Examination quality score

    Day 0

Study Arms (2)

Mobility group

EXPERIMENTAL

Participant will benefit from the study procedure (free mobility after FDG injection)

Behavioral: Mobility group

Control group

NO INTERVENTION

participant will benefit from the standard examination procedure (rest after FDG injection)

Interventions

Mobility groupBEHAVIORAL

Free mobility between FDG injection and scanning (without exiting the Nuclear Medicine Department)

Mobility group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adults
  • Patient referred for FDG PET (excluding brain PET) and carried out on an outpatient basis.

You may not qualify if:

  • Bedridden patients
  • Protected person (under guardianship or curatorship)
  • Persons under court protection
  • Persons deprived of liberty
  • Persons not affiliated to a social security scheme
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding woman

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Orléans

Orléans, 45067, France

RECRUITING

Related Publications (6)

  • Reinking MF, Osman MM. Prospective evaluation of physiologic uptake detected with true whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT in healthy subjects. J Nucl Med Technol. 2009 Mar;37(1):31-7. doi: 10.2967/jnmt.108.055004. Epub 2009 Feb 17.

    PMID: 19223428BACKGROUND
  • Karunanithi S, Soundararajan R, Sharma P, Naswa N, Bal C, Kumar R. Spectrum of Physiologic and Pathologic Skeletal Muscle (18)F-FDG Uptake on PET/CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Aug;205(2):W141-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13457. Epub 2015 May 22.

    PMID: 26001118BACKGROUND
  • Tashiro M, Fujimoto T, Itoh M, Kubota K, Fujiwara T, Miyake M, Watanuki S, Horikawa E, Sasaki H, Ido T. 18F-FDG PET imaging of muscle activity in runners. J Nucl Med. 1999 Jan;40(1):70-6.

    PMID: 9935060BACKGROUND
  • Okuyama C, Kusano K, Ito M, Takase A, Goda S, Kagawa S. Characteristic Muscular FDG Uptake Patterns Related to the Transportation Means Used by Patients to Visit the Hospital. Clin Nucl Med. 2023 Jun 1;48(6):549-552. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000004622. Epub 2023 Mar 16.

    PMID: 36928161BACKGROUND
  • Wang Y, Shao F, Zhang L, Luo X, Chen Y. Increased 18F-FDG Uptake in Multiple Muscles in a Patient With Violent Cough. Clin Nucl Med. 2017 Jun;42(6):451-453. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000001655.

    PMID: 28368886BACKGROUND
  • Vock J, Juengling FD, Krause T, Wissmeyer M. Muscular FDG uptake after chewing chewing gum in a patient with Hodgkin disease. Clin Nucl Med. 2007 Feb;32(2):124-7. doi: 10.1097/01.rlu.0000252337.14196.ed. No abstract available.

    PMID: 17242567BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Neoplasms

Study Officials

  • Adeline FRAT

    CHU Orléans

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Blind analysis of the imaging
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Prospective, randomized, controlled, comparative, single-center, non-inferiority and single-blind (for the evaluator) study.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 21, 2025

First Posted

January 29, 2025

Study Start

April 30, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Last Updated

May 26, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-05

Locations