Impact of Free Mobility on FDG Uptake in PET Scans
MOBITEP
1 other identifier
interventional
284
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is a rather long examination (around 2 hours), involving an injection of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), which requires the patient to rest for 1 hour between the injection and the start of imaging. Some hospitals allow the patient to sit, read or use the telephone, but none allow the patient to move freely after injection, hence the interest of this work. The aim of this study is to demonstrate that free mobilization of the patient following 18F-FDG injection does not result in any significant difference in imaging quality (particularly muscular fixations), and therefore a medical interpretation identical to that of a patient who remains at rest.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 21, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 29, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 30, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2026
May 26, 2026
May 1, 2026
1.3 years
January 21, 2025
May 21, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Visual image quality score (in terms of muscle fixations)
The visual quality of the images will be the main evaluation criterion. An overall examination quality score will be given by the investigator for each patient, using a 3-point Likert scale: 1. no muscular fixation (interpretable examination) 2. some muscular fixations that do not interfere with medical interpretation (interpretable examination) 3. significant muscular fixations that make the examination uninterpretable. The main evaluation criterion will be the proportion of score 1 in the two groups of patients (with and without strict rest), bearing in mind that images scored 3 are very rare.
Day 0
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Cervical SUV max
Day 0
Lumbosacral SUV max
Day 0
Improving patient comfort
Day 0
Level of stress
Day 0
Examination quality score
Day 0
Study Arms (2)
Mobility group
EXPERIMENTALParticipant will benefit from the study procedure (free mobility after FDG injection)
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONparticipant will benefit from the standard examination procedure (rest after FDG injection)
Interventions
Free mobility between FDG injection and scanning (without exiting the Nuclear Medicine Department)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults
- Patient referred for FDG PET (excluding brain PET) and carried out on an outpatient basis.
You may not qualify if:
- Bedridden patients
- Protected person (under guardianship or curatorship)
- Persons under court protection
- Persons deprived of liberty
- Persons not affiliated to a social security scheme
- Pregnant or breast-feeding woman
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Orléans
Orléans, 45067, France
Related Publications (6)
Reinking MF, Osman MM. Prospective evaluation of physiologic uptake detected with true whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT in healthy subjects. J Nucl Med Technol. 2009 Mar;37(1):31-7. doi: 10.2967/jnmt.108.055004. Epub 2009 Feb 17.
PMID: 19223428BACKGROUNDKarunanithi S, Soundararajan R, Sharma P, Naswa N, Bal C, Kumar R. Spectrum of Physiologic and Pathologic Skeletal Muscle (18)F-FDG Uptake on PET/CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Aug;205(2):W141-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13457. Epub 2015 May 22.
PMID: 26001118BACKGROUNDTashiro M, Fujimoto T, Itoh M, Kubota K, Fujiwara T, Miyake M, Watanuki S, Horikawa E, Sasaki H, Ido T. 18F-FDG PET imaging of muscle activity in runners. J Nucl Med. 1999 Jan;40(1):70-6.
PMID: 9935060BACKGROUNDOkuyama C, Kusano K, Ito M, Takase A, Goda S, Kagawa S. Characteristic Muscular FDG Uptake Patterns Related to the Transportation Means Used by Patients to Visit the Hospital. Clin Nucl Med. 2023 Jun 1;48(6):549-552. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000004622. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
PMID: 36928161BACKGROUNDWang Y, Shao F, Zhang L, Luo X, Chen Y. Increased 18F-FDG Uptake in Multiple Muscles in a Patient With Violent Cough. Clin Nucl Med. 2017 Jun;42(6):451-453. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000001655.
PMID: 28368886BACKGROUNDVock J, Juengling FD, Krause T, Wissmeyer M. Muscular FDG uptake after chewing chewing gum in a patient with Hodgkin disease. Clin Nucl Med. 2007 Feb;32(2):124-7. doi: 10.1097/01.rlu.0000252337.14196.ed. No abstract available.
PMID: 17242567BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Adeline FRAT
CHU Orléans
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Blind analysis of the imaging
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 21, 2025
First Posted
January 29, 2025
Study Start
April 30, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2026
Last Updated
May 26, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05