NCT06792058

Brief Summary

Background: Neuromuscular monitoring plays a critical role in reducing postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade (PRNB), a significant risk factor for respiratory complications. Despite the availability of various monitoring techniques, the validation of newer devices remains an ongoing challenge. This study compares the performance of the electromyography (EMG)-based Tetragraph neuromuscular monitor with the gold standard mechanomyography (MMG) device, focusing on their accuracy and reliability in clinical settings. Methods: Twenty cases were conducted during general surgeries requiring neuromuscular relaxation. Ulnar nerve was stimulated via the Tetragraph which detected the compound muscle action potential (CMAP) of adductor pollicis muscle. Simultaneously on the same arm the isometric force of the same stimulated muscle was registrated by the MMG and displayed in the Labchart 8 program. Bland-Altman analysis was used to describe the agreement between devices during distinct phases of neuromuscular blockade. The primary endpoint of the study was the comparison of TOF values of MMG and EMG during induction. In recovery, two groups were made from TOFRs: below and above the recommended muscle recovery to exclude PRNB (TOFR≥90%) (Fuchs-Buder 2023). Additionally, in deeper neuromuscular blockade Train-of-Four Count (TOFC), and Post-Tetanic Count (PTC) values were also analysed.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2024

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 2, 2024

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2024

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 14, 2025

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 24, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

January 24, 2025

Status Verified

January 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

12 months

First QC Date

January 14, 2025

Last Update Submit

January 19, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Neuromuscular monitoringMMGEMG

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • concordance of the two devices

    The primary endpoint of the study is the comparison of TOF values measured by mechanomyography and electromyography, and the examination of the measurement concordance of the two devices.

    Intraoperativ

Study Arms (1)

20 surgical patients

20 patients undergoing surgical procedures and receiving muscle relaxation

Device: Mechanomiograph: The "gold standard" of quantitative monitoringDevice: Electromiograph

Interventions

The "gold standard" of quantitative monitoring is mechanomyography (MMG), which measures the force of contraction of the adductor pollicis muscle following ulnar nerve stimulation. MMG responses are accurate and reproducible. However, the complex and bulky devices are only suitable for research use, are not suitable for clinical use and are not commercially available.

20 surgical patients

Another type of monitor is the electromyograph, which can be seen as an alternative to mechanomyography because of its accuracy. This technique measures muscle activity as a summation of the action potentials of muscle fibres. This activity is proportional to the strength of the muscle contraction. The most commonly innervated nerve is also the ulnar nerve, which innervates the abductor digiti minimi and the first dorsalis interosseus muscles. During the measurements, electrical signals from these muscles are detected. EMG has several advantages over other monitoring techniques. It does not require immobilisation of the hand, thumb immobility is not a problem, no preload is required, and hypothermia does not affect the hand as much as other neuromuscular monitors. The TetraGraph (Senzime AB, Sweden) is a portable EMG-based neuromuscular minitor for which the manufacturers received marketing approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2019.

20 surgical patients

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

patients undergoing general surgery

You may qualify if:

  • Age 18 or over.
  • ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) physical status I-III.
  • Informed written consent.
  • Surgery requires the use of a moderate-duration muscle relaxant.

You may not qualify if:

  • History of neuromuscular disease (e.g. stroke with hemi symptoms, myasthenia gravis, severe polyneuropathy).
  • Medication affecting neuromuscular transmission.
  • Open wound or rash due to electrode position
  • Expected difficult intubation.
  • Pregnancy, breast-feeding.
  • Implanted pacemaker

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Debrecen, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care

Debrecen, Hajdú-Bihar, 4030, Hungary

Location

Related Publications (14)

  • Fuchs-Buder T, Claudius C, Skovgaard LT, Eriksson LI, Mirakhur RK, Viby-Mogensen J; 8th International Neuromuscular Meeting. Good clinical research practice in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents II: the Stockholm revision. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007 Aug;51(7):789-808. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2007.01352.x.

    PMID: 17635389BACKGROUND
  • Sato H, Iwasaki H, Doshu-Kajiura A, Katagiri S, Takagi S, Luthe SK, Suzuki T. Comparison of two electromyography-based neuromuscular monitors, AF-201P and TetraGraph, in rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block: A prospective comparative study. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2022 Dec;41(6):101145. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2022.101145. Epub 2022 Aug 31.

    PMID: 36057386BACKGROUND
  • Nemes R, Lengyel S, Nagy G, Hampton DR, Gray M, Renew JR, Tassonyi E, Fulesdi B, Brull SJ. Ipsilateral and Simultaneous Comparison of Responses from Acceleromyography- and Electromyography-based Neuromuscular Monitors. Anesthesiology. 2021 Oct 1;135(4):597-611. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003896.

    PMID: 34329371BACKGROUND
  • Kopman AF, Justo MD, Mallhi MU, Abara CE, Neuman GG. The influence of changes in hand temperature on the indirectly evoked electromyogram of the first dorsal interosseous muscle. Can J Anaesth. 1995 Dec;42(12):1090-5. doi: 10.1007/BF03015094.

    PMID: 8595683BACKGROUND
  • Engbaek J, Skovgaard LT, Friis B, Kann T, Viby-Mogensen J. Monitoring of the neuromuscular transmission by electromyography (I). Stability and temperature dependence of evoked EMG response compared to mechanical twitch recordings in the cat. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1992 Aug;36(6):495-504. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1992.tb03506.x.

    PMID: 1325093BACKGROUND
  • Naguib M, Brull SJ, Johnson KB. Conceptual and technical insights into the basis of neuromuscular monitoring. Anaesthesia. 2017 Jan;72 Suppl 1:16-37. doi: 10.1111/anae.13738.

    PMID: 28044330BACKGROUND
  • Naguib M, Kopman AF, Ensor JE. Neuromuscular monitoring and postoperative residual curarisation: a meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2007 Mar;98(3):302-16. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael386.

    PMID: 17307778BACKGROUND
  • Todd MM, Hindman BJ, King BJ. The implementation of quantitative electromyographic neuromuscular monitoring in an academic anesthesia department. Anesth Analg. 2014 Aug;119(2):323-331. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000261.

    PMID: 24878683BACKGROUND
  • Murphy GS, Szokol JW, Marymont JH, Greenberg SB, Avram MJ, Vender JS. Residual neuromuscular blockade and critical respiratory events in the postanesthesia care unit. Anesth Analg. 2008 Jul;107(1):130-7. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31816d1268.

    PMID: 18635478BACKGROUND
  • Berg H, Roed J, Viby-Mogensen J, Mortensen CR, Engbaek J, Skovgaard LT, Krintel JJ. Residual neuromuscular block is a risk factor for postoperative pulmonary complications. A prospective, randomised, and blinded study of postoperative pulmonary complications after atracurium, vecuronium and pancuronium. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1997 Oct;41(9):1095-1103. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1997.tb04851.x.

    PMID: 9366929BACKGROUND
  • Arbous MS, Meursing AE, van Kleef JW, de Lange JJ, Spoormans HH, Touw P, Werner FM, Grobbee DE. Impact of anesthesia management characteristics on severe morbidity and mortality. Anesthesiology. 2005 Feb;102(2):257-68; quiz 491-2. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200502000-00005.

    PMID: 15681938BACKGROUND
  • Eriksson LI. Reduced hypoxic chemosensitivity in partially paralysed man. A new property of muscle relaxants? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1996 May;40(5):520-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1996.tb04482.x.

    PMID: 8792879BACKGROUND
  • Sundman E, Witt H, Olsson R, Ekberg O, Kuylenstierna R, Eriksson LI. The incidence and mechanisms of pharyngeal and upper esophageal dysfunction in partially paralyzed humans: pharyngeal videoradiography and simultaneous manometry after atracurium. Anesthesiology. 2000 Apr;92(4):977-84. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200004000-00014.

    PMID: 10754616BACKGROUND
  • Eriksson LI, Sato M, Severinghaus JW. Effect of a vecuronium-induced partial neuromuscular block on hypoxic ventilatory response. Anesthesiology. 1993 Apr;78(4):693-9. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199304000-00012.

    PMID: 8096684BACKGROUND

Related Links

Study Officials

  • László Asztalos, PhD

    University of Debrecen, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
OTHER
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD PhD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 14, 2025

First Posted

January 24, 2025

Study Start

January 2, 2024

Primary Completion

December 31, 2024

Study Completion

December 31, 2024

Last Updated

January 24, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-01

Locations