Sustaining Home Heart Failure Palliative Care in Rural Appalachia
Sustaining Home Palliative Care for Patients With Heart Failure (HF) and Their Family Caregivers in Rural Appalachia: A Mixed Methods Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT).
2 other identifiers
interventional
208
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this mixed methods randomized controlled trial is to test the integrated nurse-led intervention bundle for family home care management of end-stage heart failure and palliative care in rural Appalachia. This intervention bundle is designed to address rural disparities in access to health care, with the help of the faith-based nurses and local volunteer visiting neighbors.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 19, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 24, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 31, 2028
March 9, 2026
March 1, 2026
3 years
January 19, 2025
March 5, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (15)
Patient's Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12)
Measures patients' Heart Failure (HF) status \& physical function status. Each item is scored on a scale from 0 to 4 or 0 to 5, depending on the question. The overall score range is 0-100 with a higher score indicating better HF health status.
Baseline
Patient's Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12)
Measures patients' Heart Failure (HF) status \& physical function status. Each item is scored on a scale from 0 to 4 or 0 to 5, depending on the question. The overall score range is 0-100 with a higher score indicating better HF health status.
3 Month Follow up
Patient's Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12)
Measures patients' Heart Failure (HF) status \& physical function status. Each item is scored on a scale from 0 to 4 or 0 to 5, depending on the question. The overall score range is 0-100 with a higher score indicating better HF health status.
6 Month Follow up
Patient's Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12)
Measures patients' Heart Failure (HF) status \& physical function status. Each item is scored on a scale from 0 to 4 or 0 to 5, depending on the question. The overall score range is 0-100 with a higher score indicating better HF health status.
9 Month Follow up
Patient's Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12)
Measures patients' Heart Failure (HF) status \& physical function status. Each item is scored on a scale from 0 to 4 or 0 to 5, depending on the question. The overall score range is 0-100 with a higher score indicating better HF health status.
12 Month Follow Up
Patient--World Health Organization Quality of life Questionnaire
Self-assessment that measures patient's function health and well-being. Score range is 0-100 with a higher score indicating better health function and well-being.
Baseline
Patient--World Health Organization Quality of life Questionnaire
Self-assessment that measures patient's function health and well-being. Score range is 0-100 with a higher score indicating better health function and well-being.
3 Month Follow up
Patient--World Health Organization Quality of life Questionnaire
Self-assessment that measures patient's function health and well-being. Score range is 0-100 with a higher score indicating better health function and well-being.
6 Month Follow up
Patient--World Health Organization Quality of life Questionnaire
Self-assessment that measures patient's function health and well-being. Score range is 0-100 with a higher score indicating better health function and well-being.
9 Month Follow up
Patient--World Health Organization Quality of life Questionnaire
Self-assessment that measures patient's function health and well-being. Score range is 0-100 with a higher score indicating better health function and well-being.
12 Month Follow up
Caregiver--World Health Organization Quality of life Questionnaire
Self-assessment that measures patient's function health and well-being. Score range is 0-100 with a higher score indicating better health function and well-being.
Baseline
Caregiver--World Health Organization Quality of life Questionnaire
Self-assessment that measures patient's function health and well-being. Score range is 0-100 with a higher score indicating better health function and well-being.
3 Month Follow up
Caregiver--World Health Organization Quality of life Questionnaire
Self-assessment that measures patient's function health and well-being. Score range is 0-100 with a higher score indicating better health function and well-being.
6 Month Follow up
Caregiver--World Health Organization Quality of life Questionnaire
Self-assessment that measures patient's function health and well-being. Score range is 0-100 with a higher score indicating better health function and well-being.
9 Month Follow up
Caregiver--World Health Organization Quality of life Questionnaire
Self-assessment that measures patient's function health and well-being. Score range is 0-100 with a higher score indicating better health function and well-being.
12 Month Follow up
Secondary Outcomes (45)
Patient--Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
Baseline
Patient--Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
3 Month Follow up
Patient--Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
6 Month Follow up
Patient--Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
9 Month Follow up
Patient--Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
12 Month Follow up
- +40 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Control
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants in control group receive standard care which is routine HF instruction at primary providers or specialist's clinic appointments.
HF-FamPALhomeCARE
EXPERIMENTALHF-FamPALcare intervention group will receive standard care plus 2 home visits and 3 bi-weekly telephone calls on HF home EOLPC care, and follow-up telephone calls at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Interventions
Participants in HF-FamPALhomeCARE Intervention group receive standard care plus 2 home visits, 3 bi-weekly telephone call on HF home EOLPC care, and follow-up telephone calls at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients' age between 50 to 80 years with advanced HF (NYHA III or IV), diagnosed by physician
- Caregivers' age between 45 to 80 years.
- Alert and consent to participate
- Able to read and understand English
You may not qualify if:
- Already received or are on a waiting list for a heart transplant or left ventricular assist device (LVAD)
- Diagnosed with a terminal illness or dementia, such as Alzheimer's disease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
West Virginia University Hospital
Morgantown, West Virginia, 26506, United States
Related Publications (1)
Piamjariyakul U, Young S, Smothers A, Wen S, Navia RO, Sokos G, Hendrickson AE, Fink P, Niland D, Hottle M, Giolzetti AC, Smith CE. Study protocol of sustaining home palliative care for patients with Heart Failure (HF) and their family caregivers in rural Appalachia: a mixed methods randomized clinical trial. BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Mar 7;24(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01680-y.
PMID: 40055735DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ubolrat Piamjariyakul
West Virginia University School of Nursing
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Care provider and outcome assessor including data collectors will be blinded to group assignment.
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Dean for Research and Scholarship
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 19, 2025
First Posted
January 24, 2025
Study Start
April 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
April 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 31, 2028
Last Updated
March 9, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Study protocol and SAP will be shared via ClinicalTrials.gov and published protocol manuscript. The Analysis codes will be made available at the end of the project period and at the time of publication.
- Access Criteria
- There is no public access to the database during the trial period. This project's scientific data will be available on the NACDA NIH Repository 5 years after the end of the funding period.
To enhance the transparency, and reproducibility of the research, the de-identified dataset, project data descriptions, and statistical models generated by this R01 will be shared. These data will be shared in the appropriate NIH repository the National Archive of Computerized Data on Aging (NACDA) hosted by ICPSR. The description of the data management plan is also submitted.