Late Side-effects After Cervical Cancer Treatment - Prevention and Treatment
2 other identifiers
interventional
40
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Late side-effects following gynecological cancer are predominantly symptoms from the pelvic region originating from the bowels, urinary tract, lymphatic system, genitals and musculoskeletal system. Pelvic floor dysfunctions such as urinary- and anal incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, vaginal stenosis as well as compromised sexual function and dyspareunia appear to be highly prevalent. The incidence of gynecological cancer in Norway was 1700 in 2020 and the survival rate in Norway is among the highest in the world. Most women with cervical cancers are treated with curative intension and life expectancy at 5 years after diagnosis is \>80%. A negative impact of pelvic floor disorders on psychosocial well-being and quality of life are seen in survivors of gynecological cancer, and in cancer survivors this is found to be directly linked with patients regaining continence. Pelvic floor muscle training has few or no side effects, and is acknowledged as first line treatment for all types of urinary incontinence in women. Even though less studied, there is evidence to support pelvic floor muscle training as a safe intervention to reduce symptoms of anal incontinence and improve sexual function. A recent comparative cross-sectional study found that survivors of gynecological cancer with dyspareunia had higher stiffness and lower flexibility, coordination and endurance of the pelvic floor muscles compared to women with a history of total hysterectomy but no pelvic pain. These findings suggest a possible role for pelvic floor muscle training in the prevention and treatment of pelvic floor disorders after gynecological cancer. However, the overall quality of evidence for strengthening the pelvic floor muscles to reduce symptoms of pelvic floor dysfunctions after treatment of gynecological cancer is low. This study aims to assess the feasibility of a digital pelvic floor rehabilitation programme led by an experienced pelvic floor physiotherapist. Study subjects are women treated for cervical cancer within the past 5 years, and all included participants will receive the intervention due to the feasibility design. Participants will be assessed clinically at baseline and endpoint, partly to ensure proper pelvic floor muscle contraction. The digital intervention ensures residents in rural areas equal access to specialized pelvic floor rehabilitation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2025
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 3, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 22, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 4, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2026
ExpectedJune 5, 2025
June 1, 2025
12 months
January 3, 2025
June 4, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Feasibility - participants willingness to be included
Participants willingness to be included (measured by inclusion rate i.e. how many are included out of the total number asked)
The time frame is pre-defined as one year recruitment period
Adherence - participants adherence to the intervention
Participants adherence to the intervention, measured by how many group exercises they part-take in out of the total number of 32 group exercises
From enrollment until the end of the treatment at 16 weeks
Compliance to home exercises
Participants compliance to the intervention. Participants are encouraged to do home exercises 3 times weekly (equals 48 exercise sessions over the intervention period). This is measured through reports in their training diary.
From enrollment until the end of the treatment at 16 weeks
Participants impression of change
Participants impression of change following the intervention, measured by the Patient Global Impression of Change. Scale from 1-7, higher score indicating better outcome.
From enrollment until the end of the treatment at 16 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (17)
Symptoms of urinary incontinence
From enrollment until the end of the treatment at 16 weeks
Symptoms and severity of anal incontinence
From enrollment until the end of the treatment at 16 weeks
Symptoms of bowel dysfunction
From enrollment until the end of the treatment at 16 weeks
Symptoms of sexual dysfunction
From enrollment until the end of the treatment at 16 weeks
Pelvic pain symptoms
From baseline clinical examination until endpoint clinical examination (after 16 weeks intervention)
- +12 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Digital pelvic floor exercise group
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
The intervention consists of both exercise training, including pelvic floor muscle training, and information about the use of a dilator. At the baseline assessment participants are individually instructed in correct voluntary pelvic floor muscle contractions and how to perform intensive pelvic floor muscle training. The pelvic floor rehabilitation is supported with written information. The exercise program is provided with supervised digital group exercise sessions twice weekly and a home exercise program 4-5 weekly for 16 weeks. The home exercise program will be individualized if needed. The pelvic floor muscle training is following the recommendations for effective training dosage i.e. 3 sets of 10-12 repetitions, 5-7 times per week.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women diagnosed and treated for cervical cancer (surgery, radiation- or chemo therapy) within the last five years
- Cancer stadium I-III
- Adequate knowledge in Norwegian.
You may not qualify if:
- \- Previous pelvic radiation therapy or pelvic surgery.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- St. Olavs Hospitallead
- Sykehuset Ostfoldcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
St.Olavs University Hopsital
Trondheim, Trøndelag, 7030, Norway
Ă˜stfold Hospital
Fredrikstad, Ă˜stfold fylke, 1714, Norway
Related Publications (58)
Emmertsen KJ, Laurberg S. Low anterior resection syndrome score: development and validation of a symptom-based scoring system for bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2012 May;255(5):922-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824f1c21.
PMID: 22504191BACKGROUNDDeutekom M, Dobben AC, Dijkgraaf MG, Terra MP, Stoker J, Bossuyt PM. Costs of outpatients with fecal incontinence. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2005 May;40(5):552-8. doi: 10.1080/00365520510012172.
PMID: 16036507BACKGROUNDXu X, Menees SB, Zochowski MK, Fenner DE. Economic cost of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 May;55(5):586-98. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31823dfd6d.
PMID: 22513438BACKGROUNDBjerre Trent P, Falk RS, Staff AC, Jorde D, Eriksson AG. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Gynecologic Cancer Lymphedema Questionnaire and the Lower Extremity Lymphedema Screening Questionnaire. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2023 Feb 6;33(2):231-235. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003979.
PMID: 36600491BACKGROUNDEidenberger M. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures With Secondary Lower Limb Lymphedemas: A Systematic Review. J Adv Pract Oncol. 2021 Mar;12(2):174-187. doi: 10.6004/jadpro.2021.12.2.5. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
PMID: 34109049BACKGROUNDKamper SJ, Maher CG, Mackay G. Global rating of change scales: a review of strengths and weaknesses and considerations for design. J Man Manip Ther. 2009;17(3):163-70. doi: 10.1179/jmt.2009.17.3.163.
PMID: 20046623BACKGROUNDAbrams D, Davidson M, Harrick J, Harcourt P, Zylinski M, Clancy J. Monitoring the change: current trends in outcome measure usage in physiotherapy. Man Ther. 2006 Feb;11(1):46-53. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2005.02.003.
PMID: 15886046BACKGROUNDPerrot S, Lanteri-Minet M. Patients' Global Impression of Change in the management of peripheral neuropathic pain: Clinical relevance and correlations in daily practice. Eur J Pain. 2019 Jul;23(6):1117-1128. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1378. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
PMID: 30793414BACKGROUNDRampakakis E, Ste-Marie PA, Sampalis JS, Karellis A, Shir Y, Fitzcharles MA. Real-life assessment of the validity of patient global impression of change in fibromyalgia. RMD Open. 2015 Sep 14;1(1):e000146. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2015-000146. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 26535150BACKGROUNDFayers P, Bottomley A; EORTC Quality of Life Group; Quality of Life Unit. Quality of life research within the EORTC-the EORTC QLQ-C30. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2002 Mar;38 Suppl 4:S125-33. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(01)00448-8.
PMID: 11858978BACKGROUNDAaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, Filiberti A, Flechtner H, Fleishman SB, de Haes JC, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Mar 3;85(5):365-76. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.5.365.
PMID: 8433390BACKGROUNDRosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, Ferguson D, D'Agostino R Jr. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther. 2000 Apr-Jun;26(2):191-208. doi: 10.1080/009262300278597.
PMID: 10782451BACKGROUNDDeRogatis L, Pyke R, McCormack J, Hunter A, Harding G. Does the Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised cover the feelings of women with HSDD? J Sex Med. 2011 Oct;8(10):2810-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02385.x. Epub 2011 Jul 19.
PMID: 21771282BACKGROUNDDerogatis L, Clayton A, Lewis-D'Agostino D, Wunderlich G, Fu Y. Validation of the female sexual distress scale-revised for assessing distress in women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder. J Sex Med. 2008 Feb;5(2):357-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00672.x. Epub 2007 Nov 27.
PMID: 18042215BACKGROUNDDerogatis LR, Rosen R, Leiblum S, Burnett A, Heiman J. The Female Sexual Distress Scale (FSDS): initial validation of a standardized scale for assessment of sexually related personal distress in women. J Sex Marital Ther. 2002 Jul-Sep;28(4):317-30. doi: 10.1080/00926230290001448.
PMID: 12082670BACKGROUNDSaga S, Stafne SN, Dons V, Bratlie I, Spetalen S, Hagemann CT. Amsterdam complex pelvic pain symptom scale with subscales: Based on a Norwegian translation, psychometric assessment and modification of the Amsterdam hyperactive pelvic floor scale. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023 Oct;102(10):1409-1423. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14665. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
PMID: 37675780BACKGROUNDHagen S, Glazener C, Sinclair L, Stark D, Bugge C. Psychometric properties of the pelvic organ prolapse symptom score. BJOG. 2009 Jan;116(1):25-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01903.x. Epub 2008 Oct 8.
PMID: 18947342BACKGROUNDVaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, Kamm MA. Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut. 1999 Jan;44(1):77-80. doi: 10.1136/gut.44.1.77.
PMID: 9862829BACKGROUNDAvery K, Donovan J, Peters TJ, Shaw C, Gotoh M, Abrams P. ICIQ: a brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2004;23(4):322-30. doi: 10.1002/nau.20041.
PMID: 15227649BACKGROUNDBø KM, S;. Pelvic floor and exercise science. In: Bø KB, B; Mørkved, S; Van Kampen, M, editor. Evicence-based physical therapy for the pelvic floor Bridging science and clinical practice: Elsevier; 2015.
BACKGROUNDBø K, Hagen R, Kvarstein B, Jørgensen J, Larsen S, Burgio K. Pelvic floor muscle exercise for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: III. Effects of two different degrees of pelvic floor muscle exercises. Neurourol Urodyn. 1990;9(5):489-502
BACKGROUNDCyr MP, Dumoulin C, Bessette P, Pina A, Gotlieb WH, Lapointe-Milot K, Morin M. Characterizing Pelvic Floor Muscle Function and Morphometry in Survivors of Gynecological Cancer Who Have Dyspareunia: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study. Phys Ther. 2021 Apr 4;101(4):pzab042. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzab042.
PMID: 33522584BACKGROUNDDietz HP. Pelvic Floor Ultrasound: A Review. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Mar;60(1):58-81. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000264.
PMID: 28005595BACKGROUNDTennfjord MK, Engh ME, Bo K. An intra- and interrater reliability and agreement study of vaginal resting pressure, pelvic floor muscle strength, and muscular endurance using a manometer. Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Oct;28(10):1507-1514. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3290-y. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
PMID: 28299404BACKGROUNDTritter JQ, Calnan M. Cancer as a chronic illness? Reconsidering categorization and exploring experience. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2002 Sep;11(3):161-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2354.2002.00345.x.
PMID: 12296831BACKGROUNDHazewinkel MH, Sprangers MA, Taminiau-Bloem EF, van der Velden J, Burger MP, Roovers JP. Reasons for not seeking medical help for severe pelvic floor symptoms: a qualitative study in survivors of gynaecological cancer. BJOG. 2010 Jan;117(1):39-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02411.x.
PMID: 19874292BACKGROUNDTeunissen D, van Weel C, Lagro-Janssen T. Urinary incontinence in older people living in the community: examining help-seeking behaviour. Br J Gen Pract. 2005 Oct;55(519):776-82.
PMID: 16212853BACKGROUNDShaw C, Tansey R, Jackson C, Hyde C, Allan R. Barriers to help seeking in people with urinary symptoms. Fam Pract. 2001 Feb;18(1):48-52. doi: 10.1093/fampra/18.1.48.
PMID: 11145628BACKGROUNDMargalith I, Gillon G, Gordon D. Urinary incontinence in women under 65: quality of life, stress related to incontinence and patterns of seeking health care. Qual Life Res. 2004 Oct;13(8):1381-90. doi: 10.1023/B:QURE.0000040794.77438.cf.
PMID: 15503833BACKGROUNDFakhrian K, Sauer T, Dinkel A, Klemm S, Schuster T, Molls M, Geinitz H. Chronic adverse events and quality of life after radiochemotherapy in anal cancer patients. A single institution experience and review of the literature. Strahlenther Onkol. 2013 Jun;189(6):486-94. doi: 10.1007/s00066-013-0314-5. Epub 2013 May 2.
PMID: 23636349BACKGROUNDJensen NBK, Potter R, Kirchheiner K, Fokdal L, Lindegaard JC, Kirisits C, Mazeron R, Mahantshetty U, Jurgenliemk-Schulz IM, Segedin B, Hoskin P, Tanderup K; EMBRACE Collaborative Group. Bowel morbidity following radiochemotherapy and image-guided adaptive brachytherapy for cervical cancer: Physician- and patient reported outcome from the EMBRACE study. Radiother Oncol. 2018 Jun;127(3):431-439. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.05.016. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
PMID: 29880222BACKGROUNDElshahat S, Treanor C, Donnelly M. Factors influencing physical activity participation among people living with or beyond cancer: a systematic scoping review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Apr 6;18(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01116-9.
PMID: 33823832BACKGROUNDCampbell KL, Winters-Stone KM, Wiskemann J, May AM, Schwartz AL, Courneya KS, Zucker DS, Matthews CE, Ligibel JA, Gerber LH, Morris GS, Patel AV, Hue TF, Perna FM, Schmitz KH. Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus Statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019 Nov;51(11):2375-2390. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002116.
PMID: 31626055BACKGROUNDMishra SI, Scherer RW, Geigle PM, Berlanstein DR, Topaloglu O, Gotay CC, Snyder C. Exercise interventions on health-related quality of life for cancer survivors. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Aug 15;2012(8):CD007566. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007566.pub2.
PMID: 22895961BACKGROUNDBonner C, Nattress K, Anderson C, Carter J, Milross C, Philp S, Juraskova I. Chore or priority? Barriers and facilitators affecting dilator use after pelvic radiotherapy for gynaecological cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2012 Oct;20(10):2305-13. doi: 10.1007/s00520-011-1337-z. Epub 2011 Dec 8.
PMID: 22160621BACKGROUNDHaddad NC, Soares Brollo LC, Pinho Oliveira MA, Bernardo-Filho M. Diagnostic Methods for Vaginal Stenosis and Compliance to Vaginal Dilator Use: A Systematic Review. J Sex Med. 2021 Mar;18(3):493-514. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.12.013. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
PMID: 33526400BACKGROUNDMiles T, Johnson N. Vaginal dilator therapy for women receiving pelvic radiotherapy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 8;2014(9):CD007291. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007291.pub3.
PMID: 25198150BACKGROUNDBrennen R, Lin KY, Denehy L, Frawley HC. The Effect of Pelvic Floor Muscle Interventions on Pelvic Floor Dysfunction After Gynecological Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review. Phys Ther. 2020 Aug 12;100(8):1357-1371. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaa081.
PMID: 32367126BACKGROUNDLi J, Huang J, Zhang J, Li Y. A home-based, nurse-led health program for postoperative patients with early-stage cervical cancer: A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2016 Apr;21:174-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2015.09.009. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
PMID: 26482004BACKGROUNDRutledge TL, Rogers R, Lee SJ, Muller CY. A pilot randomized control trial to evaluate pelvic floor muscle training for urinary incontinence among gynecologic cancer survivors. Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Jan;132(1):154-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.10.024. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
PMID: 24183730BACKGROUNDYang EJ, Lim JY, Rah UW, Kim YB. Effect of a pelvic floor muscle training program on gynecologic cancer survivors with pelvic floor dysfunction: a randomized controlled trial. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Jun;125(3):705-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.03.045. Epub 2012 Apr 1.
PMID: 22472463BACKGROUNDCyr MP, Dumoulin C, Bessette P, Pina A, Gotlieb WH, Lapointe-Milot K, Mayrand MH, Morin M. Feasibility, acceptability and effects of multimodal pelvic floor physical therapy for gynecological cancer survivors suffering from painful sexual intercourse: A multicenter prospective interventional study. Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Dec;159(3):778-784. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.09.001. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
PMID: 33010968BACKGROUNDBernard S, Moffet H, Plante M, Ouellet MP, Leblond J, Dumoulin C. Pelvic-Floor Properties in Women Reporting Urinary Incontinence After Surgery and Radiotherapy for Endometrial Cancer. Phys Ther. 2017 Apr 1;97(4):438-448. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzx012.
PMID: 28201796BACKGROUNDHoff Braekken I, Majida M, Engh ME, Bo K. Morphological changes after pelvic floor muscle training measured by 3-dimensional ultrasonography: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Feb;115(2 Pt 1):317-324. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181cbd35f.
PMID: 20093905BACKGROUNDFerreira CH, Dwyer PL, Davidson M, De Souza A, Ugarte JA, Frawley HC. Does pelvic floor muscle training improve female sexual function? A systematic review. Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Dec;26(12):1735-50. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2749-y. Epub 2015 Jun 14.
PMID: 26072126BACKGROUNDHagen S, Stark D. Conservative prevention and management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7;2011(12):CD003882. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003882.pub4.
PMID: 22161382BACKGROUNDDumoulin C, Cacciari LP, Hay-Smith EJC. Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 4;10(10):CD005654. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005654.pub4.
PMID: 30288727BACKGROUNDGerharz EW, Mansson A, Hunt S, Skinner EC, Mansson W. Quality of life after cystectomy and urinary diversion: an evidence based analysis. J Urol. 2005 Nov;174(5):1729-36. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000176463.40530.05.
PMID: 16217273BACKGROUNDPorter MP, Penson DF. Health related quality of life after radical cystectomy and urinary diversion for bladder cancer: a systematic review and critical analysis of the literature. J Urol. 2005 Apr;173(4):1318-22. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000149080.82697.65.
PMID: 15758789BACKGROUNDAllemani C, Matsuda T, Di Carlo V, Harewood R, Matz M, Niksic M, Bonaventure A, Valkov M, Johnson CJ, Esteve J, Ogunbiyi OJ, Azevedo E Silva G, Chen WQ, Eser S, Engholm G, Stiller CA, Monnereau A, Woods RR, Visser O, Lim GH, Aitken J, Weir HK, Coleman MP; CONCORD Working Group. Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival 2000-14 (CONCORD-3): analysis of individual records for 37 513 025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries. Lancet. 2018 Mar 17;391(10125):1023-1075. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33326-3. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
PMID: 29395269BACKGROUNDRutledge TL, Heckman SR, Qualls C, Muller CY, Rogers RG. Pelvic floor disorders and sexual function in gynecologic cancer survivors: a cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Nov;203(5):514.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.08.004. Epub 2010 Sep 24.
PMID: 20869691BACKGROUNDNeron M, Bastide S, Tayrac R, Masia F, Ferrer C, Labaki M, Boileau L, Letouzey V, Huberlant S. Impact of gynecologic cancer on pelvic floor disorder symptoms and quality of life: an observational study. Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 19;9(1):2250. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-38759-5.
PMID: 30783163BACKGROUNDSchofield C, Newton RU, Cohen PA, Galvao DA, McVeigh JA, Mohan GR, Tan J, Salfinger SG, Straker LM, Peddle-McIntyre CJ. Health-related quality of life and pelvic floor dysfunction in advanced-stage ovarian cancer survivors: associations with objective activity behaviors and physiological characteristics. Support Care Cancer. 2018 Jul;26(7):2239-2246. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4069-5. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
PMID: 29392481BACKGROUNDLindgren A, Dunberger G, Enblom A. Experiences of incontinence and pelvic floor muscle training after gynaecologic cancer treatment. Support Care Cancer. 2017 Jan;25(1):157-166. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3394-9. Epub 2016 Sep 5.
PMID: 27596267BACKGROUNDOsann K, Hsieh S, Nelson EL, Monk BJ, Chase D, Cella D, Wenzel L. Factors associated with poor quality of life among cervical cancer survivors: implications for clinical care and clinical trials. Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Nov;135(2):266-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.08.036. Epub 2014 Sep 3.
PMID: 25192629BACKGROUNDRamaseshan AS, Felton J, Roque D, Rao G, Shipper AG, Sanses TVD. Pelvic floor disorders in women with gynecologic malignancies: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Apr;29(4):459-476. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3467-4. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
PMID: 28929201BACKGROUNDSekse RJT, Dunberger G, Olesen ML, Osterbye M, Seibaek L. Lived experiences and quality of life after gynaecological cancer-An integrative review. J Clin Nurs. 2019 May;28(9-10):1393-1421. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14721. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
PMID: 30461101BACKGROUNDTrotti A, Colevas AD, Setser A, Rusch V, Jaques D, Budach V, Langer C, Murphy B, Cumberlin R, Coleman CN, Rubin P. CTCAE v3.0: development of a comprehensive grading system for the adverse effects of cancer treatment. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2003 Jul;13(3):176-81. doi: 10.1016/S1053-4296(03)00031-6.
PMID: 12903007BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Signe Nilssen Stafne
St. Olavs University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 3, 2025
First Posted
January 22, 2025
Study Start
February 4, 2025
Primary Completion
February 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2026
Last Updated
June 5, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share