Impact of Using the Airseal System with Ultra-low Pneumoperitoneum in Patients Undergoing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: a Prospective, Comparative, Randomized Clinical Study.
ARCO2
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The AirSeal platform has been evaluated in urological surgeries, mainly in cases of malignant diseases 5,6. However, there is still a lack of data demonstrating the possible benefits of its use, which justifies the conduct of this research in order to aggregate such knowledge. Therefore, the objective of this prospective pilot study is to compare and evaluate the role of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum with the AirSeal system in patients with prostate cancer undergoing robot-assisted prostatectomy with those undergoing the procedure with the conventional insufflation system. We seek to provide more data on the use of AirSeal, which is associated with shorter operative times, shorter hospital stays and a lower probability of complications. In addition, we aim to ratify the effectiveness and cost-benefit of using the AirSeal system.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Feb 2025
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 15, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 20, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 15, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 15, 2026
CompletedJanuary 20, 2025
January 1, 2025
11 months
January 15, 2025
January 15, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Variance in Intra-abdominal Pressure with the AirSeal System
The primary aim of this study is to compare the variance in intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy between patients using the AirSeal System and those using a conventional CO2 insufflation system. The AirSeal System is expected to provide a more stable IAP at ultra-low pressures (6-8 mmHg) compared to the standard pressures (12-15 mmHg) maintained by the conventional insufflator.
Day 1 (Day of Procedure)
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Reduction in Blood Loss with the AirSeal System
Day 1 (Day of Procedure)
Length of Hospital Stay
Duration of hospital stay (up to 7 days)
Incidence of Postoperative Complications
Up to 2 weeks post-procedure
Study Arms (2)
Conventional Insufflator and Trocar
OTHERSubjects enrolled in this study arm will undergo robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using a conventional CO2 insufflation system. This system maintains standard intra-abdominal pressure (12-15 mmHg) and is widely used in clinical practice.
AirSeal® System-Interventional
EXPERIMENTALSubjects enrolled in this study arm will undergo robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using the AirSeal® System. The device enables stable pneumoperitoneum at ultra-low pressures (6-8 mmHg), aiming to reduce complications and improve surgical outcomes.
Interventions
The Conventional Insufflation System employs standard CO2 insufflation techniques for maintaining intra-abdominal pressure during laparoscopic and robotic surgeries. It serves as the base for comparison with the AirSeal® System.
The AirSeal® System consists of an insufflation, filtration, and recirculation system (AirSeal® IFS), a triple-lumen filtered tube set, and a valve-free trocar (AirSeal® Access Port). This innovative system allows peritoneal access and pneumoperitoneum maintenance without a mechanical seal, reducing CO2 usage and associated complications.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with prostate cancer who will undergo robotic prostatectomy;
You may not qualify if:
- Patients over 65 and under 18 years of age;
- Patients allergic to NSAIDs and/or Morphine and/or Tramadol;
- Patients with chronic renal failure;
- Patients with recurrence, metastasis and other existing neoplasms.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Instituto Brasileiro de Cirurgia Robotica
Salvador, Estado de Bahia, 43017030, Brazil
Hospital Mater Dei Salvador
Salvador, Estado de Bahia, Brazil
Related Publications (5)
Razdan S, Ucpinar B, Okhawere KE, Badani KK. The Role of AirSeal in Robotic Urologic Surgery: A Systematic Review. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2023 Jan;33(1):21-31. doi: 10.1089/lap.2022.0153. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
PMID: 35671523BACKGROUNDHorstmann M, Horton K, Kurz M, Padevit C, John H. Prospective comparison between the AirSeal(R) System valve-less Trocar and a standard Versaport Plus V2 Trocar in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2013 May;27(5):579-82. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0632. Epub 2013 Feb 5.
PMID: 23186377BACKGROUNDFeng TS, Heulitt G, Islam A, Porter JR. Comparison of valve-less and standard insufflation on pneumoperitoneum-related complications in robotic partial nephrectomy: a prospective randomized trial. J Robot Surg. 2021 Jun;15(3):381-388. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01117-z. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
PMID: 32632561BACKGROUNDBhat KRS, Raghunath SK, Srivatsa N, Tejus C, Vishruth K, Kumar RA. Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Radical Prostatectomy-a Contemporary Review. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2020 Dec;11(4):580-588. doi: 10.1007/s13193-020-01125-3. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
PMID: 33299276BACKGROUNDBalayssac D, Selvy M, Martelin A, Giroudon C, Cabelguenne D, Armoiry X. Clinical and Organizational Impact of the AIRSEAL(R) Insufflation System During Laparoscopic Surgery: A Systematic Review. World J Surg. 2021 Mar;45(3):705-718. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05869-5. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
PMID: 33258023BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
NILO J. MD
Brazilian Institute of Robotic Surgery
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 15, 2025
First Posted
January 20, 2025
Study Start
February 1, 2025
Primary Completion
December 15, 2025
Study Completion
February 15, 2026
Last Updated
January 20, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01