Telerehabilitation on Physical Fitness, Functional Status, and Quality of Life in Frail Older Adults
Teleactivate 3
Effectiveness of Synchronous Telerehabilitation Versus Face-To-Face Physical Therapy on Physical Fitness, Functional Status, and Quality of Life in Frail Older Adults
2 other identifiers
interventional
58
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to analyze whether the effectiveness of a synchronous telerehabilitation program is better than a face-to-face physical therapy program in improving the physical fitness, functional status, and quality of life in frail male and female volunteers aged 60 years or older living in the community and haven frailty according to the modified Fried phenotype scale. The main research questions are: 1) Is a synchronous telerehabilitation program effective in improving the physical fitness, functional status and quality of life of frail older people?; 2) Is a synchronous telerehabilitation program more effective in improving the physical fitness, functional status and quality of life, compared to face-to-face physical therapy program, in frail older adults? In synchronous telerehabilitation program group, a healthcare professional will supervise up to four or five participants remotely exercising at home during each session, using a real-time videoconferencing app. Participants will be able to see and talk to both the health professional and the other participants. The exercise program will consist of 1-hour sessions carried out twice a week for 12 weeks. In the face-to-face physical therapy group, the exercise sessions will take place in a older person care center, which will also last 1 hour twice a week for 12 weeks. Regardless of the group, exercise sessions will include a mixture of cardiovascular, balance, strength, flexibility, and gait exercises.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 14, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 20, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 30, 2025
CompletedFebruary 3, 2025
January 1, 2025
2 months
January 14, 2025
January 29, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Lower limb strength
Will be measured using a five-repetition sit-to-stand test. The OAs will be asked to stand up and sit down, as quickly as possible, five times, from a chair without armrests located on a wall. The time will be measured from the beginning of the movement until the OA manages to stand up for the fifth time. The older adult's arms should be crossed over the chest during the test. The time will be recorded in seconds, and tenths of a second.
Both groups will be face-to-face assessed one week before and after the 12-week intervention.
Cardiorespiratory fitness
Will be measured by a 2-minutes step test: The evaluator will count the number of full steps completed by the participant in 2 minutes. A full step is defined as a step performed while raising the knee up to a height corresponding to the midpoint between the patella and the iliac crest.
Both groups will be face-to-face assessed one week before and after the 12-week intervention.
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Upper limb strength
Both groups will be face-to-face assessed one week before and after the 12-week intervention.
Dynamic balance
Both groups will be face-to-face assessed one week before and after the 12-week intervention.
Static balance
Both groups will be face-to-face assessed one week before and after the 12-week intervention.
Quality of life
Both groups will be face-to-face assessed one week before and after the 12-week intervention.
Functional status
Both groups will be face-to-face assessed one week before and after the 12-week intervention.
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
Sociodemographic background
Both groups will be assessed in person one week prior to the 12-week intervention.
Study Arms (2)
Synchronous telerehabilitation program (STR Group)
EXPERIMENTALDuring each session, a technical staff member will supervise up to four or five participants who are exercising remotely at home using a real-time videoconferencing app (Zoom®, CA, USA). The videoconference session will be projected on a television screen located in an older adult's care centre. Participants will be able to see and talk to the healthcare professional and other participants. The older adults, from their homes, will complete 1-hour sessions twice a week for 12 weeks.
Face-to-face physical therapy program (FPT Group)
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe face-to-face exercise sessions will take place in a senior centre for older person, lasting 40-60 min, twice a week for 12 weeks.
Interventions
Each session will consist of a warm-up activity (5-10 min), main exercise activity (30-40 min), and cool-down activity (5-10 min) following the guidelines of multicomponent exercise program Vivifrail. Exercise intensity will be controlled based on the Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) on the Borg scale and heart rate measured with a smartwatch before, during, and after each exercise session according to the guidelines of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM), as explained below. The warm-up and cool-down activities will include stretching and walking in place (9≤RPE≤10 and 40\<55% maximum Heart rate (HRmax). While the main exercise activity will consist of strength, resistance exercise, cardiovascular exercises, and balance exercises (to avoid falls) performed using dumbbells, colour-coded resistance bands (Thera-Band; Hygenic Corp.) and a chair (11\<RPE≤15 and 55\<70 HRmax).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- (i) both sexes aged ≥60 years, (ii) community-dwelling older adults, (iii) older adults having frailty according to the modified Fried phenotype scale, (iv) ability to stand up and walk ≥10 meters without assistance technique, (v) Abbreviated Mini Mental State (MMSE) \>13 points, (vi) no medical contraindication for physical exercise. In addition, older adults must have a smartphone or tablet, and Internet connection at home. Computer or Internet literacy is not required as an eligibility criterion.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Marina Alvaradolead
Study Sites (1)
Universidad Católica Silva Henríquez
Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, 6513491, Chile
Related Publications (14)
Cramer SC, Dodakian L, Le V, See J, Augsburger R, McKenzie A, Zhou RJ, Chiu NL, Heckhausen J, Cassidy JM, Scacchi W, Smith MT, Barrett AM, Knutson J, Edwards D, Putrino D, Agrawal K, Ngo K, Roth EJ, Tirschwell DL, Woodbury ML, Zafonte R, Zhao W, Spilker J, Wolf SL, Broderick JP, Janis S; National Institutes of Health StrokeNet Telerehab Investigators. Efficacy of Home-Based Telerehabilitation vs In-Clinic Therapy for Adults After Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. 2019 Sep 1;76(9):1079-1087. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.1604.
PMID: 31233135BACKGROUNDNeo JH, Teo ST, Lee CL, Cai CC. Telerehabilitation in the Treatment of Frozen Shoulder: A Case Report. Int J Telerehabil. 2019 Dec 12;11(2):3-8. doi: 10.5195/ijt.2019.6288. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 35949924BACKGROUNDTurolla A, Rossettini G, Viceconti A, Palese A, Geri T. Musculoskeletal Physical Therapy During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Is Telerehabilitation the Answer? Phys Ther. 2020 Aug 12;100(8):1260-1264. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaa093. No abstract available.
PMID: 32386218BACKGROUNDVelayati F, Ayatollahi H, Hemmat M. A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Telerehabilitation Interventions for Therapeutic Purposes in the Elderly. Methods Inf Med. 2020 May;59(2-03):104-109. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1713398. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
PMID: 32629502BACKGROUNDChangizi M, Kaveh MH. Effectiveness of the mHealth technology in improvement of healthy behaviors in an elderly population-a systematic review. Mhealth. 2017 Nov 27;3:51. doi: 10.21037/mhealth.2017.08.06. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 29430455BACKGROUNDWu G, Keyes LM. Group tele-exercise for improving balance in elders. Telemed J E Health. 2006 Oct;12(5):561-70. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2006.12.561.
PMID: 17042710BACKGROUNDSolis-Navarro L, Gismero A, Fernandez-Jane C, Torres-Castro R, Sola-Madurell M, Berge C, Perez LM, Ars J, Martin-Borras C, Vilaro J, Sitja-Rabert M. Effectiveness of home-based exercise delivered by digital health in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Age Ageing. 2022 Nov 2;51(11):afac243. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac243.
PMID: 36346736BACKGROUNDYuen J, Thiyagarajan CA, Belci M. Patient experience survey in telemedicine for spinal cord injury patients. Spinal Cord. 2015 Apr;53(4):320-3. doi: 10.1038/sc.2014.247. Epub 2015 Jan 27.
PMID: 25622730BACKGROUNDLevy CE, Silverman E, Jia H, Geiss M, Omura D. Effects of physical therapy delivery via home video telerehabilitation on functional and health-related quality of life outcomes. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2015;52(3):361-70. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2014.10.0239.
PMID: 26230650BACKGROUNDSchmeler MR, Schein RM, McCue M, Betz K. Telerehabilitation clinical and vocational applications for assistive technology: research, opportunities, and challenges. Int J Telerehabil. 2009 Sep 4;1(1):59-72. doi: 10.5195/ijt.2009.6014. eCollection 2009 Fall.
PMID: 25945163BACKGROUNDIrgens I, Rekand T, Arora M, Liu N, Marshall R, Biering-Sorensen F, Alexander M. Telehealth for people with spinal cord injury: a narrative review. Spinal Cord. 2018 Jul;56(7):643-655. doi: 10.1038/s41393-017-0033-3. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
PMID: 29515211BACKGROUNDTheodoros D, Russell T. Telerehabilitation: current perspectives. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;131:191-209.
PMID: 18431862BACKGROUNDKairy D, Tousignant M, Leclerc N, Cote AM, Levasseur M, Researchers TT. The patient's perspective of in-home telerehabilitation physiotherapy services following total knee arthroplasty. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013 Aug 30;10(9):3998-4011. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10093998.
PMID: 23999548BACKGROUNDCigarroa I, Reyes-Molina D, Vargas-Rios F, Lopez-Alarcon G, Jara-Aceituno S, Riquelme-Hernandez C, Zapata-Lamana R, Parra-Rizo MA. Effectiveness of Synchronous Telerehabilitation Versus Face-to-Face Physical Therapy in Older Adults Who Are Frail: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Sep 16;14:e72318. doi: 10.2196/72318.
PMID: 40957013DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- This study has been designed as a blinded (assessor and statistician), parallel group, randomized controlled trial (RCT)
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 14, 2025
First Posted
January 20, 2025
Study Start
April 1, 2025
Primary Completion
May 30, 2025
Study Completion
August 30, 2025
Last Updated
February 3, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01