NCT06784245

Brief Summary

The goal of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to analyze whether the effectiveness of a synchronous telerehabilitation program is better than a face-to-face physical therapy program in improving the physical fitness, functional status, and quality of life in frail male and female volunteers aged 60 years or older living in the community and haven frailty according to the modified Fried phenotype scale. The main research questions are: 1) Is a synchronous telerehabilitation program effective in improving the physical fitness, functional status and quality of life of frail older people?; 2) Is a synchronous telerehabilitation program more effective in improving the physical fitness, functional status and quality of life, compared to face-to-face physical therapy program, in frail older adults? In synchronous telerehabilitation program group, a healthcare professional will supervise up to four or five participants remotely exercising at home during each session, using a real-time videoconferencing app. Participants will be able to see and talk to both the health professional and the other participants. The exercise program will consist of 1-hour sessions carried out twice a week for 12 weeks. In the face-to-face physical therapy group, the exercise sessions will take place in a older person care center, which will also last 1 hour twice a week for 12 weeks. Regardless of the group, exercise sessions will include a mixture of cardiovascular, balance, strength, flexibility, and gait exercises.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
58

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 14, 2025

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 20, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 30, 2025

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 30, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

February 3, 2025

Status Verified

January 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

January 14, 2025

Last Update Submit

January 29, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Older personFragilityTelerehabilitationPhysical fitnessFunctional statusQuality of life

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Lower limb strength

    Will be measured using a five-repetition sit-to-stand test. The OAs will be asked to stand up and sit down, as quickly as possible, five times, from a chair without armrests located on a wall. The time will be measured from the beginning of the movement until the OA manages to stand up for the fifth time. The older adult's arms should be crossed over the chest during the test. The time will be recorded in seconds, and tenths of a second.

    Both groups will be face-to-face assessed one week before and after the 12-week intervention.

  • Cardiorespiratory fitness

    Will be measured by a 2-minutes step test: The evaluator will count the number of full steps completed by the participant in 2 minutes. A full step is defined as a step performed while raising the knee up to a height corresponding to the midpoint between the patella and the iliac crest.

    Both groups will be face-to-face assessed one week before and after the 12-week intervention.

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Upper limb strength

    Both groups will be face-to-face assessed one week before and after the 12-week intervention.

  • Dynamic balance

    Both groups will be face-to-face assessed one week before and after the 12-week intervention.

  • Static balance

    Both groups will be face-to-face assessed one week before and after the 12-week intervention.

  • Quality of life

    Both groups will be face-to-face assessed one week before and after the 12-week intervention.

  • Functional status

    Both groups will be face-to-face assessed one week before and after the 12-week intervention.

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Sociodemographic background

    Both groups will be assessed in person one week prior to the 12-week intervention.

Study Arms (2)

Synchronous telerehabilitation program (STR Group)

EXPERIMENTAL

During each session, a technical staff member will supervise up to four or five participants who are exercising remotely at home using a real-time videoconferencing app (Zoom®, CA, USA). The videoconference session will be projected on a television screen located in an older adult's care centre. Participants will be able to see and talk to the healthcare professional and other participants. The older adults, from their homes, will complete 1-hour sessions twice a week for 12 weeks.

Behavioral: TeleActivate

Face-to-face physical therapy program (FPT Group)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The face-to-face exercise sessions will take place in a senior centre for older person, lasting 40-60 min, twice a week for 12 weeks.

Behavioral: TeleActivate

Interventions

TeleActivateBEHAVIORAL

Each session will consist of a warm-up activity (5-10 min), main exercise activity (30-40 min), and cool-down activity (5-10 min) following the guidelines of multicomponent exercise program Vivifrail. Exercise intensity will be controlled based on the Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) on the Borg scale and heart rate measured with a smartwatch before, during, and after each exercise session according to the guidelines of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM), as explained below. The warm-up and cool-down activities will include stretching and walking in place (9≤RPE≤10 and 40\<55% maximum Heart rate (HRmax). While the main exercise activity will consist of strength, resistance exercise, cardiovascular exercises, and balance exercises (to avoid falls) performed using dumbbells, colour-coded resistance bands (Thera-Band; Hygenic Corp.) and a chair (11\<RPE≤15 and 55\<70 HRmax).

Also known as: Telerehabilitation
Face-to-face physical therapy program (FPT Group)Synchronous telerehabilitation program (STR Group)

Eligibility Criteria

Age60 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • (i) both sexes aged ≥60 years, (ii) community-dwelling older adults, (iii) older adults having frailty according to the modified Fried phenotype scale, (iv) ability to stand up and walk ≥10 meters without assistance technique, (v) Abbreviated Mini Mental State (MMSE) \>13 points, (vi) no medical contraindication for physical exercise. In addition, older adults must have a smartphone or tablet, and Internet connection at home. Computer or Internet literacy is not required as an eligibility criterion.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Universidad Católica Silva Henríquez

Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, 6513491, Chile

Location

Related Publications (14)

  • Cramer SC, Dodakian L, Le V, See J, Augsburger R, McKenzie A, Zhou RJ, Chiu NL, Heckhausen J, Cassidy JM, Scacchi W, Smith MT, Barrett AM, Knutson J, Edwards D, Putrino D, Agrawal K, Ngo K, Roth EJ, Tirschwell DL, Woodbury ML, Zafonte R, Zhao W, Spilker J, Wolf SL, Broderick JP, Janis S; National Institutes of Health StrokeNet Telerehab Investigators. Efficacy of Home-Based Telerehabilitation vs In-Clinic Therapy for Adults After Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. 2019 Sep 1;76(9):1079-1087. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.1604.

    PMID: 31233135BACKGROUND
  • Neo JH, Teo ST, Lee CL, Cai CC. Telerehabilitation in the Treatment of Frozen Shoulder: A Case Report. Int J Telerehabil. 2019 Dec 12;11(2):3-8. doi: 10.5195/ijt.2019.6288. eCollection 2019.

    PMID: 35949924BACKGROUND
  • Turolla A, Rossettini G, Viceconti A, Palese A, Geri T. Musculoskeletal Physical Therapy During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Is Telerehabilitation the Answer? Phys Ther. 2020 Aug 12;100(8):1260-1264. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaa093. No abstract available.

    PMID: 32386218BACKGROUND
  • Velayati F, Ayatollahi H, Hemmat M. A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Telerehabilitation Interventions for Therapeutic Purposes in the Elderly. Methods Inf Med. 2020 May;59(2-03):104-109. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1713398. Epub 2020 Jul 6.

    PMID: 32629502BACKGROUND
  • Changizi M, Kaveh MH. Effectiveness of the mHealth technology in improvement of healthy behaviors in an elderly population-a systematic review. Mhealth. 2017 Nov 27;3:51. doi: 10.21037/mhealth.2017.08.06. eCollection 2017.

    PMID: 29430455BACKGROUND
  • Wu G, Keyes LM. Group tele-exercise for improving balance in elders. Telemed J E Health. 2006 Oct;12(5):561-70. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2006.12.561.

    PMID: 17042710BACKGROUND
  • Solis-Navarro L, Gismero A, Fernandez-Jane C, Torres-Castro R, Sola-Madurell M, Berge C, Perez LM, Ars J, Martin-Borras C, Vilaro J, Sitja-Rabert M. Effectiveness of home-based exercise delivered by digital health in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Age Ageing. 2022 Nov 2;51(11):afac243. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac243.

    PMID: 36346736BACKGROUND
  • Yuen J, Thiyagarajan CA, Belci M. Patient experience survey in telemedicine for spinal cord injury patients. Spinal Cord. 2015 Apr;53(4):320-3. doi: 10.1038/sc.2014.247. Epub 2015 Jan 27.

    PMID: 25622730BACKGROUND
  • Levy CE, Silverman E, Jia H, Geiss M, Omura D. Effects of physical therapy delivery via home video telerehabilitation on functional and health-related quality of life outcomes. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2015;52(3):361-70. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2014.10.0239.

    PMID: 26230650BACKGROUND
  • Schmeler MR, Schein RM, McCue M, Betz K. Telerehabilitation clinical and vocational applications for assistive technology: research, opportunities, and challenges. Int J Telerehabil. 2009 Sep 4;1(1):59-72. doi: 10.5195/ijt.2009.6014. eCollection 2009 Fall.

    PMID: 25945163BACKGROUND
  • Irgens I, Rekand T, Arora M, Liu N, Marshall R, Biering-Sorensen F, Alexander M. Telehealth for people with spinal cord injury: a narrative review. Spinal Cord. 2018 Jul;56(7):643-655. doi: 10.1038/s41393-017-0033-3. Epub 2018 Mar 7.

    PMID: 29515211BACKGROUND
  • Theodoros D, Russell T. Telerehabilitation: current perspectives. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;131:191-209.

    PMID: 18431862BACKGROUND
  • Kairy D, Tousignant M, Leclerc N, Cote AM, Levasseur M, Researchers TT. The patient's perspective of in-home telerehabilitation physiotherapy services following total knee arthroplasty. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013 Aug 30;10(9):3998-4011. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10093998.

    PMID: 23999548BACKGROUND
  • Cigarroa I, Reyes-Molina D, Vargas-Rios F, Lopez-Alarcon G, Jara-Aceituno S, Riquelme-Hernandez C, Zapata-Lamana R, Parra-Rizo MA. Effectiveness of Synchronous Telerehabilitation Versus Face-to-Face Physical Therapy in Older Adults Who Are Frail: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Sep 16;14:e72318. doi: 10.2196/72318.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Telerehabilitation

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

RehabilitationAftercareContinuity of Patient CarePatient CareTherapeuticsHealth ServicesHealth Care Facilities Workforce and ServicesTelemedicineDelivery of Health CarePatient Care ManagementHealth Services Administration

Central Study Contacts

Igor Cigarroa, PhD

CONTACT

Marina Alvarado, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
This study has been designed as a blinded (assessor and statistician), parallel group, randomized controlled trial (RCT)
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Synchronous telerehabilitation program (STR group) During the exercise session, the participants turns on the tablet PC, watches the instructor perform the exercise, and follows the instructor's movements. For the instructor to observe the correct movements of the participants, the resistance and balance exercises are performed in the frontal and sagittal planes. During each session, a technical stuff will supervise up to four or five participants exercising remotely at home, using a real-time videoconferencing app (Zoom®, CA, USA). The videoconference session will be projected on a television screen located in an older adult's care center. Once the technical stuff has been assigned participants, their supervision will not be interchangeable. Participants will be able to see and talk to both, the healthcare professional and other participants. The older adults, from their homes, will complete 1-hour sessions, twice a week for 12 weeks.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PhD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 14, 2025

First Posted

January 20, 2025

Study Start

April 1, 2025

Primary Completion

May 30, 2025

Study Completion

August 30, 2025

Last Updated

February 3, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-01

Locations