Long-term Outcomes of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis in Remission
The ARCTIC REWIND Extension Study - Long-term Outcomes of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis in Remission
1 other identifier
observational
259
1 country
10
Brief Summary
The goal of this multi-center prospective observational study is to develop knowledge on how to best personalize treatment and follow-up strategies for patients with RA in remission, with the intention to prevent relapse of disease activity and progression of joint damage and at the same time avoid the use of unnecessary treatment and health resources. The investigators will perform an extensive evaluation of all patients who participated in the ARCTIC REWIND study 10 and 15 years after they achieved sustained remission and received different treatment strategies.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Nov 2025
Longer than P75 for all trials
10 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 12, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 20, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2034
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2034
March 10, 2025
February 1, 2025
8.2 years
December 12, 2024
March 7, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Disease activity remission status
Remission status will be assessed according to e.g the disease activity score DAS, the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and ACR/EULAR Boolean 2.0 remission. DAS includes the ritchie articular index, the swollen joint count (based on 44 joints), the ESR and the Patient's Global Assessment of disease activity on a VAS 0-100 mm (PGA). The following cut-points are used: High disease activity: DAS \> 3.7; Moderate disease activity: 3.7 ≥ DAS\>2.4; Low disease activity: 2.4 ≥ DAS ≥ 1.6; In remission: DAS \< 1.6 The SDAI includes tender and swollen joints (of 28), PGA, PhGA and CRP. According to SDAI, the following cut-points are used: High disease activity: SDAI\> 26.0; Moderate disease activity: 26.0 ≥ SDAI\>11.0; Low disease activity: 11.0 ≥ SDAI \> 3.3; In remission: SDAI ≤ 3.3 ACR/EULAR 2.0 remission is defined as the combination of tender joints ≤ 1, swollen joints ≤ 1, CRP ≤ 1 and patient global assessment ≤ 2 (on a scale 0-10).
Assessed at the visit 10- and 15-year after the initial inclusion into the ARCTIC REWIND trial
Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug (DMARD)-free remission
The prevalence of DMARD-free remission
Assessed at the visit 10- and 15-year after the initial inclusion into the ARCTIC REWIND trial
Radiographic score (van der Heijde modified Sharp score (vdHSS)
Radiographs of hands and feet. The van der Heijde-modified Sharp scoring method will be used, which assesses erosions in 16 joints of each hand (range, 0-5 for each joint) and in 6 joints of each foot (range, 0-10 per joint) and joint space narrowing in 15 joints for each hand and in 6 joints for each foot (range, 0-4 per joint).This gives scores for erosions on a scale from 0 to 280 and joint space narrowing on a scale from 0 to168, thus the total van der Heijde-modified Sharp score ranges from 0 to 448, with higher scores indicating greater joint damage.
Assessed at the visit 10- and 15-year after the initial inclusion into the ARCTIC REWIND trial
Radiographic joint damage progression
Radiographs of hands and feet. The van der Heijde-modified Sharp scoring method will be used, which assesses erosions in 16 joints of each hand (range, 0-5 for each joint) and in 6 joints of each foot (range, 0-10 per joint) and joint space narrowing in 15 joints for each hand and in 6 joints for each foot (range, 0-4 per joint).This gives scores for erosions on a scale from 0 to 280 and joint space narrowing on a scale from 0 to168, thus the total van der Heijde-modified Sharp score ranges from 0 to 448, with higher scores indicating greater joint damage. The images will be compared to the last corresponding images undertaken in the ARCTIC REWIND trial. Progression will be calculated as e.g. annual increase in van der Heijde modified Sharp score ≥ 1 unit.
Assessed at the visit 10- and 15-year after the initial inclusion into the ARCTIC REWIND trial
Disease activity composite measures
The following composite measures will be included: disease activity score (DAS), DAS based on 28 joint counts (DAS28), the simplified disease activity index (SDAI) and the clinical disease activity index (CDAI). These are based on tender and swollen joint counts, the PGA, acute phase reactants (except from CDAI), and, for SDAI and CDAI also the PhGA. DAS: High disease activity: DAS \> 3.7; Moderate disease activity: 3.7 ≥ DAS\>2.4; Low disease activity: 2.4 ≥ DAS ≥ 1.6; In remission: DAS \< 1.6 DAS28: High disease activity: DAS28 \> 5.1; Moderate disease activity: 5.1 ≥ DAS28\>3.2; Low disease activity: 3.2 ≥ DAS28 ≥ 2.6; In remission: DAS28 \< 2.6 CDAI: High disease activity: CDAI \> 22.0; Moderate disease activity: 22.0 ≥ CDAI\>10.0; Low disease activity: 10.0 ≥ CDAI \> 2.8; In remission: CDAI ≤ 2.8 SDAI: High disease activity: SDAI\> 26.0;Moderate disease activity: 26.0 ≥ SDAI\>11.0; Low disease activity: 11.0 ≥ SDAI; In remission SDAI ≤ 3.3
Assessed at the visit 10- and 15-year after the initial inclusion into the ARCTIC REWIND trial
Patient reported physical function
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information (PROMIS) HAQ (Health Assessment Questionnaire ) 20-item short form will be used in this study. Each question has five response options, ranging in value from one to five. To find the total raw score, the sum of the values of the response to each question is calculated, giving a range in scores from 20 to 100 if all questions are answered. The total raw score should be translated into a T-score for each participant (either by standardized conversion tables or using item-level calibrations), which rescales the raw score into a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. Therefore, a person with a T-score of 40 is one SD worse than average.
Assessed at the visit 10- and 15-year after the initial inclusion into the ARCTIC REWIND trial
Secondary Outcomes (20)
Health-related quality of life
Assessed at the visit 10- and 15-year after the initial inclusion into the ARCTIC REWIND trial
Patient global assessment of disease activity
Assessed at the visit 10- and 15-year after the initial inclusion into the ARCTIC REWIND trial
Physician global assessment of disease activity
Assessed at the visit 10- and 15-year after the initial inclusion into the ARCTIC REWIND trial
Ultrasound inflammation
Assessed at the visit 10- and 15-year after the initial inclusion into the ARCTIC REWIND trial
Swollen joint count
Assessed at the visit 10- and 15-year after the initial inclusion into the ARCTIC REWIND trial
- +15 more secondary outcomes
Eligibility Criteria
The study population consists of men and women with established rheumatoid arthritis who have experienced sustained remission and participated in the ARCTIC REWIND trial. All the 259 patients that entered the ARCTIC REWIND trial are eligible to participate in the extension study.
You may qualify if:
- Participation in the ARCTIC REWIND trial
- Patients able and willing to give written informed consent and comply with the requirements of the study protocol
You may not qualify if:
- Psychiatric or mental disorders, alcohol abuse, other substance abuse, other factors making adherence to the study protocol impossible.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Diakonhjemmet Hospitallead
- South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authoritycollaborator
- The Research Council of Norwaycollaborator
- Olav Thon Foundationcollaborator
Study Sites (10)
Ålesund Hospital
Ålesund, Norway
Haukeland University Hospital
Bergen, Norway
Vestre Viken Hospital
Drammen, Norway
Sørlandet Hospital
Kristiansand, Norway
Revmatismesykehuset
Lillehammer, Norway
Helgelandssykehuset Mo i Rana
Mo i Rana, Norway
Østfold Hospital
Moss, Norway
Diakonhjemmet Hospital
Oslo, Norway
Martina Hansens Hospital
Sandvika, Norway
University Hospital of North Norway
Tromsø, Norway
Biospecimen
serum, plasma, buffy coat, PBMC, RNA storage tubes and full blood
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 12, 2024
First Posted
January 20, 2025
Study Start
November 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2034
Study Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2034
Last Updated
March 10, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-02