The Effect of Rubber Dam on Objective and Subjective Parameters of Stress During Dental Treatment in Children
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Although rubber dam application provides many advantages, several pediatric dentists avoid using it, arguing that it may increase stress for young patients. The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the effect of rubber dam on the subjective and objective stress in children and the effects of preferred anesthesia methods during use of the rubber dam on the same parameters. A total of 100 children, aged 6-12 years old participated in this study. The selected site of the patients divided cotton roll and rubber dam application group, and the rubber dam group divided also two subgroups as topical and infiltration anesthesia application. Objective parameters of stress of the patients and pulse rate of the operator were measured at three different time points. Pain perception was also evaluated subjectively. The data were statistically analyzed (p\<0.05).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 4, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 16, 2025
CompletedJuly 11, 2025
July 1, 2025
2 months
December 4, 2024
July 8, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
blood pressure
systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure for the children recorded. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure were measured using an automatic blood pressure monitor (mmHg). (min 20 mmHg- max 320 mmHg) The mean values and standard deviations of these measured values be taken into account.
one week intervals about observation/treatment sessions (total time is 2 weeks)
pulse rate
pulse rate for the children and the operator recorded. Pulse rate was evaluated with a fingertip pulse oximeter (unit per minute) (min 60- max 160). The mean values and standard deviations of these measured values be taken into account.
one week intervals about observation/treatment sessions (total time is 2 weeks)
Secondary Outcomes (2)
pain perception
one week intervals about observation/treatment sessions (total time is 2 weeks)
pain perception
one week intervals about observation/treatment sessions (total time is 2 weeks)
Study Arms (4)
local anesthesia
ACTIVE COMPARATORlocal anesthesia application before rubber dam isolation
topical anesthesia
ACTIVE COMPARATORtopical anesthesia application before rubber dam isolation
rubber dam
ACTIVE COMPARATORRubber dam isolation and evaluation of the associated objective and subjective stress parameters
cotton roll
ACTIVE COMPARATORcotton roll insulation and evaluation of the associated objective and subjective stress parameters
Interventions
Patients were divided according to the randomization procedure. infiltration anesthesia (Maxicaine Forte, Artikain, VEM Drug, Turkey) was performed with a 20-gauge needle. Following the administration of anesthetic, an appropriate size rubber dam and metal clamp was placed i and pit and fissure sealant was applied. The stress parameters of the subjects were recorded at three measurement points. At the conclusion of the treatment, pain perception was evaluated subjectively using the WBFPRS and VAS.
Patients were divided i according to the randomization procedure. The topical anesthetic agent (EMLA, AstraZeneca, Cotia, São Paulo, Brazil) was applied using a disposable dental Q-tip for 10-20 seconds. Following the administration of anesthetic, an appropriate size rubber dam and metal clamp was placed i and pit and fissure sealant was applied. The stress parameters of the subjects were recorded at three measurement points. At the conclusion of the treatment, pain perception was evaluated subjectively using the WBFPRS and VAS.
Patients were divided into 4 subgroups according to the randomization procedure: topical anesthesia and infiltrative anesthesia before the placement of the clamp and also cotton roll application other side of the arch. The topical anesthetic agent (EMLA, AstraZeneca, Cotia, São Paulo, Brazil) was applied using a disposable dental Q-tip for 10-20 seconds and infiltration anesthesia (Maxicaine Forte, Artikain, VEM Drug, Turkey) was performed with a 20-gauge needle. Following the administration of anesthetics, an appropriate size rubber dam and metal clamp was placed in the mandibular arch, and pit and fissure sealant was applied to the opposite arch. The stress parameters of the subjects and dentist were recorded at three measurement points. At the conclusion of the treatment, pain perception was evaluated subjectively using the WBFPRS and VAS.
Patients were divided into 4 subgroups according to the randomization procedure: topical anesthesia and infiltrative anesthesia before the placement of the clamp and also cotton roll application other side of the arch. The topical anesthetic agent (EMLA, AstraZeneca, Cotia, São Paulo, Brazil) was applied using a disposable dental Q-tip for 10-20 seconds and infiltration anesthesia (Maxicaine Forte, Artikain, VEM Drug, Turkey) was performed with a 20-gauge needle. Following the administration of anesthetics, an appropriate size rubber dam and metal clamp was placed in the mandibular arch, and pit and fissure sealant was applied to the opposite arch. The stress parameters of the subjects and dentist were recorded at three measurement points. At the conclusion of the treatment, pain perception was evaluated subjectively using the WBFPRS and VAS.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years child,
- classified as ASA I (american assossiation of anesthesiologist)
- cooperative children
- child with bilateral fully erupted mandibular first permanent molars requiring pit and fissure sealant procedures.
You may not qualify if:
- patients/guardians who do not agree to participate in the study.
- child with chronic systemic disease
- non-cooperative children
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
İzmir Katip Celebi University
Izmir, 35640, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (4)
Ammann P, Kolb A, Lussi A, Seemann R. Influence of rubber dam on objective and subjective parameters of stress during dental treatment of children and adolescents - a randomized controlled clinical pilot study. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2013 Mar;23(2):110-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2012.01232.x. Epub 2012 Mar 8.
PMID: 22404253BACKGROUNDAfshari E, Sabbagh S, Khorakian F, Sarraf Shirazi A, Akbarzadeh Baghban A. Reducing pain and discomfort associated with rubber dam clamp placement in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness. BMC Oral Health. 2023 Jun 16;23(1):398. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03115-7.
PMID: 37328861BACKGROUNDWang Y, Li C, Yuan H, Wong MC, Zou J, Shi Z, Zhou X. Rubber dam isolation for restorative treatment in dental patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Sep 20;9(9):CD009858. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009858.pub2.
PMID: 27648846BACKGROUNDKucukyilmaz E, Ozdemir T, Savas S. The effect of rubber dam on objective and subjective parameters of stress during dental treatment in children: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2025 May 30;25(1):855. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06250-5.
PMID: 40448060DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
TUGBA OZDEMIR, RES ASİST
İZMİR KATIP CELEBI UNİVERSİTY
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PROFESSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 4, 2024
First Posted
January 16, 2025
Study Start
July 1, 2024
Primary Completion
September 1, 2024
Study Completion
November 1, 2024
Last Updated
July 11, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
due to concerns about the security of unpublished data