NCT06779448

Brief Summary

Although rubber dam application provides many advantages, several pediatric dentists avoid using it, arguing that it may increase stress for young patients. The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the effect of rubber dam on the subjective and objective stress in children and the effects of preferred anesthesia methods during use of the rubber dam on the same parameters. A total of 100 children, aged 6-12 years old participated in this study. The selected site of the patients divided cotton roll and rubber dam application group, and the rubber dam group divided also two subgroups as topical and infiltration anesthesia application. Objective parameters of stress of the patients and pulse rate of the operator were measured at three different time points. Pain perception was also evaluated subjectively. The data were statistically analyzed (p\<0.05).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2024

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2024

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2024

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 4, 2024

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 16, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

July 11, 2025

Status Verified

July 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

December 4, 2024

Last Update Submit

July 8, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

dental anxietylocal anesthesiatopical anesthesiarubber damcotton rolldental stressstress parameters

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • blood pressure

    systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure for the children recorded. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure were measured using an automatic blood pressure monitor (mmHg). (min 20 mmHg- max 320 mmHg) The mean values and standard deviations of these measured values be taken into account.

    one week intervals about observation/treatment sessions (total time is 2 weeks)

  • pulse rate

    pulse rate for the children and the operator recorded. Pulse rate was evaluated with a fingertip pulse oximeter (unit per minute) (min 60- max 160). The mean values and standard deviations of these measured values be taken into account.

    one week intervals about observation/treatment sessions (total time is 2 weeks)

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • pain perception

    one week intervals about observation/treatment sessions (total time is 2 weeks)

  • pain perception

    one week intervals about observation/treatment sessions (total time is 2 weeks)

Study Arms (4)

local anesthesia

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

local anesthesia application before rubber dam isolation

Other: Evaluation of objective and subjective stress parameters caused by local anesthesia during treatmentsOther: Evaluation of objective and subjective stress parameters caused by topical anesthesia during treatmentsOther: Evaluation of objective and subjective stress parameters caused by the application of rubber dam during treatments in the patient and dentistOther: Evaluation of the objective and subjective stress parameters caused by the application of cotton rolls during treatments in the patient and dentist

topical anesthesia

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

topical anesthesia application before rubber dam isolation

Other: Evaluation of objective and subjective stress parameters caused by local anesthesia during treatmentsOther: Evaluation of objective and subjective stress parameters caused by topical anesthesia during treatmentsOther: Evaluation of objective and subjective stress parameters caused by the application of rubber dam during treatments in the patient and dentistOther: Evaluation of the objective and subjective stress parameters caused by the application of cotton rolls during treatments in the patient and dentist

rubber dam

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Rubber dam isolation and evaluation of the associated objective and subjective stress parameters

Other: Evaluation of objective and subjective stress parameters caused by local anesthesia during treatmentsOther: Evaluation of objective and subjective stress parameters caused by topical anesthesia during treatmentsOther: Evaluation of objective and subjective stress parameters caused by the application of rubber dam during treatments in the patient and dentistOther: Evaluation of the objective and subjective stress parameters caused by the application of cotton rolls during treatments in the patient and dentist

cotton roll

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

cotton roll insulation and evaluation of the associated objective and subjective stress parameters

Other: Evaluation of objective and subjective stress parameters caused by local anesthesia during treatmentsOther: Evaluation of objective and subjective stress parameters caused by topical anesthesia during treatmentsOther: Evaluation of objective and subjective stress parameters caused by the application of rubber dam during treatments in the patient and dentistOther: Evaluation of the objective and subjective stress parameters caused by the application of cotton rolls during treatments in the patient and dentist

Interventions

Patients were divided according to the randomization procedure. infiltration anesthesia (Maxicaine Forte, Artikain, VEM Drug, Turkey) was performed with a 20-gauge needle. Following the administration of anesthetic, an appropriate size rubber dam and metal clamp was placed i and pit and fissure sealant was applied. The stress parameters of the subjects were recorded at three measurement points. At the conclusion of the treatment, pain perception was evaluated subjectively using the WBFPRS and VAS.

cotton rolllocal anesthesiarubber damtopical anesthesia

Patients were divided i according to the randomization procedure. The topical anesthetic agent (EMLA, AstraZeneca, Cotia, São Paulo, Brazil) was applied using a disposable dental Q-tip for 10-20 seconds. Following the administration of anesthetic, an appropriate size rubber dam and metal clamp was placed i and pit and fissure sealant was applied. The stress parameters of the subjects were recorded at three measurement points. At the conclusion of the treatment, pain perception was evaluated subjectively using the WBFPRS and VAS.

cotton rolllocal anesthesiarubber damtopical anesthesia

Patients were divided into 4 subgroups according to the randomization procedure: topical anesthesia and infiltrative anesthesia before the placement of the clamp and also cotton roll application other side of the arch. The topical anesthetic agent (EMLA, AstraZeneca, Cotia, São Paulo, Brazil) was applied using a disposable dental Q-tip for 10-20 seconds and infiltration anesthesia (Maxicaine Forte, Artikain, VEM Drug, Turkey) was performed with a 20-gauge needle. Following the administration of anesthetics, an appropriate size rubber dam and metal clamp was placed in the mandibular arch, and pit and fissure sealant was applied to the opposite arch. The stress parameters of the subjects and dentist were recorded at three measurement points. At the conclusion of the treatment, pain perception was evaluated subjectively using the WBFPRS and VAS.

cotton rolllocal anesthesiarubber damtopical anesthesia

Patients were divided into 4 subgroups according to the randomization procedure: topical anesthesia and infiltrative anesthesia before the placement of the clamp and also cotton roll application other side of the arch. The topical anesthetic agent (EMLA, AstraZeneca, Cotia, São Paulo, Brazil) was applied using a disposable dental Q-tip for 10-20 seconds and infiltration anesthesia (Maxicaine Forte, Artikain, VEM Drug, Turkey) was performed with a 20-gauge needle. Following the administration of anesthetics, an appropriate size rubber dam and metal clamp was placed in the mandibular arch, and pit and fissure sealant was applied to the opposite arch. The stress parameters of the subjects and dentist were recorded at three measurement points. At the conclusion of the treatment, pain perception was evaluated subjectively using the WBFPRS and VAS.

cotton rolllocal anesthesiarubber damtopical anesthesia

Eligibility Criteria

Age6 Years - 12 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • years child,
  • classified as ASA I (american assossiation of anesthesiologist)
  • cooperative children
  • child with bilateral fully erupted mandibular first permanent molars requiring pit and fissure sealant procedures.

You may not qualify if:

  • patients/guardians who do not agree to participate in the study.
  • child with chronic systemic disease
  • non-cooperative children

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

İzmir Katip Celebi University

Izmir, 35640, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Ammann P, Kolb A, Lussi A, Seemann R. Influence of rubber dam on objective and subjective parameters of stress during dental treatment of children and adolescents - a randomized controlled clinical pilot study. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2013 Mar;23(2):110-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2012.01232.x. Epub 2012 Mar 8.

    PMID: 22404253BACKGROUND
  • Afshari E, Sabbagh S, Khorakian F, Sarraf Shirazi A, Akbarzadeh Baghban A. Reducing pain and discomfort associated with rubber dam clamp placement in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness. BMC Oral Health. 2023 Jun 16;23(1):398. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03115-7.

    PMID: 37328861BACKGROUND
  • Wang Y, Li C, Yuan H, Wong MC, Zou J, Shi Z, Zhou X. Rubber dam isolation for restorative treatment in dental patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Sep 20;9(9):CD009858. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009858.pub2.

    PMID: 27648846BACKGROUND
  • Kucukyilmaz E, Ozdemir T, Savas S. The effect of rubber dam on objective and subjective parameters of stress during dental treatment in children: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2025 May 30;25(1):855. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06250-5.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Toothache

Interventions

Dentists

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Tooth DiseasesStomatognathic DiseasesFacial PainPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Dental StaffHealth PersonnelHealth Care Facilities Workforce and Services

Study Officials

  • TUGBA OZDEMIR, RES ASİST

    İZMİR KATIP CELEBI UNİVERSİTY

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: randomized, controlled, single-blinded, split mouth clinical study
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PROFESSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 4, 2024

First Posted

January 16, 2025

Study Start

July 1, 2024

Primary Completion

September 1, 2024

Study Completion

November 1, 2024

Last Updated

July 11, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

due to concerns about the security of unpublished data

Locations