High Versus Low Pneumoperitoneum PressUre for Parenchymal Transection in Minimally Invasive Major Liver Surgery
PPULS
1 other identifier
interventional
132
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Minimally invasive techniques in liver surgery gain popularity as they facilitate postoperative recovery while achieving comparable oncologic outcomes to the open approach. No consensus on the application of pneumoperitoneum pressure in minimal invasive liver resections (MILR) has been reached yet, as prospective clinical studies are scarce. The positive pressure of the CO2 pneumoperitoneum reduces intraoperative blood loss during MILR alongside the development of new transection devices and advancements in inflow control. Low-pressure pneumoperitoneum on the other hand has been shown to decrease postoperative pain scores and analgesic consumption in comparison to standard pneumoperitoneum, and international guidelines recommend the application of "the lowest intra-abdominal pressure allowing adequate exposure of the operative field rather than a routine pressure". Nevertheless, evidence for the application of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum is only moderate to low, requiring additional studies to better define its safety. To address this oxymoron, the investigators conduct a randomized non-inferiority trial to investigate the effect of low in comparison to high-pressure pneumoperitoneum during the transection phase of major MILR on intraoperative blood loss while also evaluating the risk of embolic complications.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 13, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2027
January 13, 2025
December 1, 2024
2 years
December 30, 2024
January 7, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Intraoperative blood loss
From the time of randomization until the completion of the liver surgery, assessed up to 24 hours.
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Incidence of CO2 embolisms
intraoperative
Morbidity rate
90 days postoperative
Mortality rate
90 days postoperative
Study Arms (2)
High Pressure Pneumoperitoneum
ACTIVE COMPARATORIntraperitoneal insufflation pressures (IIP) during the parenchymal transection phase of liver resection will be different between the two study groups. Baseline IIP of the surgical procedure will be ≤10 mmHg. IIP will be elevated to ≥14 mmHg in the intervention group during the parenchymal transection phase of liver resection.
Low Pressure Pneumoperitoneum
SHAM COMPARATORIntraperitoneal insufflation pressures (IIP) during the parenchymal transection phase of liver resection will be different between the two study groups. Baseline IIP of the surgical procedure will be ≤10 mmHg. IIP will be maintained at ≤10 mmHg in the control group.
Interventions
The objective of this trial is to determine whether the maintenance of a low intraperitoneal insufflation pressure (IIP) of ≤10 mmHg during the parenchymal transection phase of conventional and robotic-assisted laparoscopic liver resection is non-inferior to a higher IIP of ≥14 mmHg in terms of intraoperative blood loss, gas embolisms, perioperative morbidity, and mortality.
The objective of this trial is to determine whether the maintenance of a low intraperitoneal insufflation pressure (IIP) of ≤10 mmHg during the parenchymal transection phase of conventional and robotic-assisted laparoscopic liver resection is non-inferior to a higher IIP of ≥14 mmHg in terms of intraoperative blood loss, gas embolisms, perioperative morbidity, and mortality.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age equal or older than 18 years and
- capacity of consent and
- planned elective conventional laparoscopic or da Vinci-assisted major liver resection or resections near the liver hilum or the hepatic venous vasculature. Major liver resections are defined as the resection of 3 liver segments or more (right and left partial hepatectomies, extended right and left hepatectomies, liver resections of 3 or more segments). Right posterior sectionectomies and mesohepatectomies of ≥2 liver segments are considered resections in proximity to the liver hilum or hepatic venous vasculature.
You may not qualify if:
- the participation in another trial with interference of intervention and outcome of this study,
- being a woman who is pregnant or breast-feeding or planning to become pregnant,
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (AS) score \>3,
- language barrier,
- any contraindication to a minimal invasive surgical approach or intolerance to pneumoperitoneum
- a patent foramen ovale (PFO) or any other structural cardiac defect that facilitates paradoxical gas embolisms,
- diagnosis of neuromuscular disease, heart failure NYHA \> class II or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
- being on oral anticoagulation therapy other than Aspirin 100mg daily or any other condition known to increase the risk of bleeding.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University Hospital Heidelberglead
- University of Ulmcollaborator
- University Hospital Dresdencollaborator
- Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgiumcollaborator
Related Publications (1)
Giehl-Brown E, Khajeh E, Dehne S, Czigany Z, Gutzeit O, Neuhaus C, Riediger C, Birgin E, Rahbari N, D'Hondt M, Lurje G, Weigand M, Michalski C, Mehrabi A, Kahlert C. High versus low pneumoperitoneum PressUre for parenchymal transection in minimally invasive major liver surgery (PPULS)-a non-inferiority, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Trials. 2025 Dec 1;26(1):556. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-09269-9.
PMID: 41327288DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 30, 2024
First Posted
January 13, 2025
Study Start
January 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2027
Last Updated
January 13, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
Upon reasonable request, the data generated by the current research that supports our future article, would be made available as soon as possible, wherever legally and ethically possible.