NCT06769451

Brief Summary

Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) are the leading cause of sudden cardiac death (SCD) worldwide. The implantable defibrillator (ICD) increases survival in patients at risk of VA, with data of superiority to antiarrhythmic drugs. Nevertheless, the ICD cannot prevent VAs, and shocks delivered by the device (appropriate and inappropriate) negatively impact patients' quality of life. Transcatheter ablation (TCA) is the percutaneous therapy that can eliminate VAs and prevent any recurrence. TCA is the state of the art for the treatment of drug-unresponsive VAs in patients with structural heart disease, but the prevalence of recurrence remains high (between 30% and 60%). For these reasons, several reports have recently appeared in the literature proposing a new solution for the treatment of VAs in which the use of external-beam body radiotherapy with stereotactic-radiosurgical technique (SBRT) is described. SBRT represents a rapid, noninvasive approach based on the delivery of high radiation doses of photons (25 Gy in a single fraction) to a precise location in cardiac tissue. SBRT has entered the latest 2022 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines on VAs as a "bailout therapy". Based on preliminary data in the oncology setting, proton therapy could allow further optimization of compliance of these therapeutic doses by preserving even more of the healthy heart part and thus reducing the cardiopulmonary toxicity of radiotherapy outside the ablation target. The investigators therefore propose an experimental (prospective interventional) study to evaluate the toxicity (primary endpoint) and efficacy (secondary endpoint) of proton radiosurgery for the treatment of VA with an enrollment of 21 patients. The primary endpoint is to evaluate the toxicity of proton radiotherapy in the acute phase (during the first 30 days of the procedure) and at 3, 6 and 12 months. A crucial part of the protocol will be the proper definition of the target to be irradiated, which will require the integration of different non-invasive cardiac imaging methodologies such as CT (Computed Tomography), MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) and PET (Positron Emission Tomography), coupled with invasive and/or "non-invasive" body surface mapping with multi-electrode electrocardiogram (ECG) so as to obtain a "cardiac image" in which the myocardial scar and the arrhythmogenic region are fused.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
21

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
46mo left

Started Feb 2025

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress25%
Feb 2025Feb 2030

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 7, 2025

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 10, 2025

Completed
22 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2025

Completed
5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2030

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2030

Last Updated

January 27, 2025

Status Verified

December 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

5 years

First QC Date

January 7, 2025

Last Update Submit

January 23, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR)Malignant ventricular TachycardiaVentricular Tachycardia StormRadiotherapyProton Therapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Toxicity of STAR with a single dose of 25Gy(RBE) applied with Proton Therapy

    The primary endpoint will be the assessment of the toxicity of proton therapy and will be evaluated in the acute phase (during the first 30 days of the procedure) and at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. The incidence of Major Adverse Events (MAEs) related to, or presumed to be related, to proton therapy ablation will be assessed as percentage of patients with events compared to the total enrolled. The definition of MAEs (for the primary endpoint of the study) is identical to that of SAEs (as defined for reporting under Good Clinical Practice (GCP)) and can be found in the section "Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) / Major Adverse Events (MAEs) of the study protocol."

    Recording of MAEs for the first 24 months after therapy

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Efficacy of STAR with a single dose of 25Gy(RBE) applied with Proton Therapy

    Efficacy measures will be recorded for the first 24 months after therapy

Study Arms (1)

Radiosurgical ablation of a tachyarrhytmogenic substrate with Proton Therapy

EXPERIMENTAL

Ablation of the arrhythmogenic substrate with a single dose of 25Gy(RBE) with Proton Therapy after pretreatment diagnostics with CT, MR and electrophysiology for the definition of the arrhytmogenic substrate. Follow-up for 24 months after treatment.

Radiation: Stereotactic Arrhythmia Radioablation (STAR) with Proton Therapy

Interventions

STAR with a single dose of 25Gy(RBE) Proton Therapy

Radiosurgical ablation of a tachyarrhytmogenic substrate with Proton Therapy

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • age ≥ 40 years
  • carrier of ICD/CRT-D or S-ICD
  • episodes of ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation requiring defibrillator intervention (shock or ATP) which are:
  • refractory to maximal drug therapy;
  • recurrent (at least 3 episodes in the previous 6 months);
  • patients with contraindications to a conventional ablative strategy, in relation to the high risk associated with the procedure due to the severity of the heart disease and/or the presence of comorbidities or patients who have already undergone ablation, in the presence of an arrhythmogenic substrate refractory to or unsuitable for an interventional approach or patients who refuse transcatheter ablative attempts due to high intraoperative risk in relation to the patient's characteristics.
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 20%.

You may not qualify if:

  • inability to express informed consent
  • previous thoracic radiotherapy (RT) with cardiac involvement
  • active myocardial ischemia
  • recent cardiac revascularization (\< 120 days)
  • hemodynamic instability (cardiogenic shock, NYHA class IV)
  • contraindication to radiosurgery (e.g., due to artifacts or other technical reasons)
  • lack of patient cooperation in pre-procedural investigations
  • ICD malfunction
  • severe comorbidity with prognosis \< 12 months
  • pregnancy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Cardiology Rovereto and Proton Therapy Trento, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari (APSS)

Trento, Italy, 38123, Italy

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Zeppenfeld K, Rademaker R, Al-Ahmad A, Carbucicchio C, De Chillou C, Cvek J, Ebert M, Ho G, Kautzner J, Lambiase P, Merino JL, Lloyd M, Misra S, Pruvot E, Sapp J, Schiappacasse L, Sramko M, Stevenson WG, Zei PC, Wichterle D, Chrispin J, Siklody CH, Neuwirth R, Pelargonio G, Reichlin T, Robinson C, Tondo C. Patient selection, ventricular tachycardia substrate delineation, and data transfer for stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation: a clinical consensus statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology and the Heart Rhythm Society. Europace. 2025 Mar 28;27(4):euae214. doi: 10.1093/europace/euae214.

    PMID: 39177652BACKGROUND
  • Kovacs B, Lehmann HI, Manninger M, Saguner AM, Futyma P, Duncker D, Chun J. Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation and its implications for modern cardiac electrophysiology: results of an EHRA survey. Europace. 2024 May 2;26(5):euae110. doi: 10.1093/europace/euae110.

    PMID: 38666444BACKGROUND
  • Sultan A, Futyma P, Metzner A, Anic A, Richter S, Roten L, Badertscher P, Conte G, Chun JKR. Management of ventricular tachycardias: insights on centre settings, procedural workflow, endpoints, and implementation of guidelines-results from an EHRA survey. Europace. 2024 Feb 1;26(2):euae030. doi: 10.1093/europace/euae030.

    PMID: 38363995BACKGROUND
  • Widesott L, Dionisi F, Fracchiolla F, Tommasino F, Centonze M, Amichetti M, Del Greco M. Proton or photon radiosurgery for cardiac ablation of ventricular tachycardia? Breath and ECG gated robust optimization. Phys Med. 2020 Oct;78:15-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.08.021. Epub 2020 Sep 8.

    PMID: 32911373BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Tachycardia, Ventricular

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

TachycardiaArrhythmias, CardiacHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesCardiac Conduction System DiseasePathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Central Study Contacts

Maurizio Del Greco, M.D.

CONTACT

Frank RH Lohr, M.D.

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 7, 2025

First Posted

January 10, 2025

Study Start

February 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2030

Last Updated

January 27, 2025

Record last verified: 2024-12

Locations