Comparative Study on AQP4 Antibody Detection Methods
A Multi-center Comparative Real-World Study on AQP4 Antibody Detection Methods Using Live Cell and Fixed Cell-Based Assay Technologies
1 other identifier
observational
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to determine which method is more suitable for clinical application by comparing the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of serum AQP4-IgG detection using live cell CBA and fixed cell CBA methods, thereby improving the diagnostic accuracy of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Nov 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 11, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 4, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 9, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 27, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 27, 2025
CompletedJanuary 9, 2025
January 1, 2025
1.2 years
January 4, 2025
January 4, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Sensitivity (CI%), Specificity (CI%), Accuracy (CI%), PLR (CI%), NLR (CI%)
The sensitivity, 95% confidence interval (CI) for sensitivity, specificity, and 95% CI for specificity of AQP4 antibody detection methods using live cell and fixed cell-based assay technologies in NMOSD and suspected NMOSD, along with the corresponding results from various control groups and overall controls, are given.
immediately
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Agreement ,Cohen's kappa, Spearman correlation coefficient
immediately
Study Arms (4)
NMOSD
cases confirm a diagnosis of NMOSD according to 2015 NMOSD diagnostic criteria by IPND (International Panel for NMO Diagnosis).
suspected NMOSD
cases having features suggestive of NMOSD but can not confirm a diagnosis of NMOSD according to 2015 NMOSD diagnostic criteria by IPND (International Panel for NMO Diagnosis).
MS
cases confirm a diagnosis of MS according to 2017 McDonald criteria with no features suggestive of NMOSD.
Other disease
cases confirm a diagnosis of neurological disease other than NMOSD and MS, including autoimmune encephalitis, viral encephalitis, myasthenia gravis et al.
Eligibility Criteria
Sex, Gender, diagnose, the number of relapses in NMOSD patients
You may qualify if:
- NMOSD: Confirm a diagnosis of NMOSD according to 2015 NMOSD diagnostic criteria by IPND (International Panel for NMO Diagnosis) suspected NMOSD: cases having features suggestive of NMOSD but can not confirm a diagnosis of NMOSD according to 2015 NMOSD diagnostic criteria by IPND (International Panel for NMO Diagnosis).
- the following 'high risk' clinical and laboratory features had to be met
- optic neuritis that was either severe with poor recovery (residual visual acuity in better eye worse or equal to 6/36), bilateral (simultaneous orsequential within 3 months) or recurrent (more than 2 attacks) as the sole clinical manifestation of demyelinating disease,
- severe transverse myelitis with a central cord syndrome (symmetrical, motor, sensory and bladder involvement) and poor recovery (residual EDSS greater than 5.0) or a longitudinally extensive lesion of the spinal cord spanning 3 or more vertebral segments on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or
- demyelinating disease clinically confined to the optic nerve and spinal cord with at least one of the following: normal or atypical MRI of the brain (fewer than 2 periventricular lesions), negative oligoclonal bands in cerebrospinal fluid, raised CSF protein or a CSF pleocytosis (more than 10 cells per μl) 2.All subjects provided written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with incomplete clinical information. 2.Patients without serum samples.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, 400016, China
Biospecimen
Blood samples are collected.
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jinzhou Feng, Ph.D
First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CROSSOVER
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Target Duration
- 120 Days
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Ph.D
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 4, 2025
First Posted
January 9, 2025
Study Start
November 11, 2023
Primary Completion
January 27, 2025
Study Completion
January 27, 2025
Last Updated
January 9, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share