NCT06762665

Brief Summary

Performing a consultation with the radiologist before a spinal invasive procedure serves to foster a trusting physician-patient relationship. It also provides an opportunity for the comprehensive explanation of the procedure, its aftermath, and any patient inquiries. We believe that this proactive approach has the potential to alleviate pre-procedure anxiety, thereby contributing to an enhanced overall experience of the intervention and its outcomes. Despite these potential benefits, it is noteworthy that such consultations are not systematically implemented, and their impact on the intervention effictness remains unexplored in existing literature. The hypothesis is grounded in the belief that patients who perform a consultation preceding their spinal intervention are likely to witness improvements in both the overall experience of the procedure and its effectiveness.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
270

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
16mo left

Started Feb 2025

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress48%
Feb 2025Sep 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 31, 2024

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 7, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 12, 2025

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2027

Expected
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2027

Last Updated

March 20, 2025

Status Verified

March 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2.3 years

First QC Date

December 31, 2024

Last Update Submit

March 17, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

ConsultationRemote consultationRadiology interventionalSpinal InjectionsHealth care

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Comparison of the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) between the 3 groups

    Measuring pain on a numerical scale is a common method used to assess and communicate the intensity of a person's pain. The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) is a numerical scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no pain, and 10 represents the worst imaginable pain. Patients are asked to rate their pain by choosing a number that best reflects their current level of pain. Interpretation: 0: No pain 1-3: Mild pain 4-6: Moderate pain 7-10: Severe pain

    30 days after the surgical procedure

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Patient satisfaction with care

    30 days after the surgical procedure

  • Assessment of Intervention Anxiety

    Patient anxiety will be assessed at Day 0, just before the invervention

  • Assessment of Medication Consumption

    The Medication Consumption will be recorded throughout the study (120 days)

  • Assessment of Procedure-Symptom Adequacy Improvement

    before the procedure

  • The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)

    To assess short-term pain 15 days after the surgical procedure

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Physical Consultation (PC)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

These patients have a consultation with the radiologist prior to the intervention, including an interview about their medical history and symptoms, a clinical examination, a review of the imaging file, an explanation of the procedure, and the opportunity to ask questions.

Procedure: Spinal injectionOther: pre-operative consultation

Teleconsultation (TC)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

These patients have a teleconsultation with the radiologist prior to the intervention, including an interview about their medical history and symptoms, a review of the imaging file, an explanation of the procedure, and the opportunity to ask questions.

Procedure: Spinal injectionOther: pre-operative consultation

No Consultation (NC)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

These patients not have a consultation prior to the procedure: The radiologist reviews the imaging file remotely. The explanation of the procedure is provided through documents, and questions are answered only on the day of the intervention.

Procedure: Spinal injection

Interventions

Patients underwent a spinal injection procedure under CT scan

No Consultation (NC)Physical Consultation (PC)Teleconsultation (TC)

Pre-operative consultation, in person or by teleconsultation, consists of an interview about the patient's history and symptoms. This is followed by a clinical examination and consultation of the patient's imaging file, to confirm the request for paraspinal infiltration and its location. In addition, the radiologist explains the procedure to the patient, supplementing the explanatory documents already provided at the time of the appointment, and outlines the results that may be expected and any complications.

Physical Consultation (PC)Teleconsultation (TC)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patient 18 years of age or older
  • Referred to the imaging department for a peri-spinal injection under CT guidance.
  • Low back pain, dorsal pain, or neck pain with an average pain intensity of ≥ 5/10 on NPRS.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient unable to read and/or write French
  • Patient unable to condut a teleconsultation (no phone, no internet connection)
  • Current pregnancy, breastfeeding, or lack of effective contraception for women of childbearing age
  • Lack of consent
  • Legally protected population:
  • Adults protected by law (guardianship, curatorship, or judicial protection)
  • Non-emancipated minors
  • Individuals unable to express consent (research conducted in emergency situations)
  • Individuals deprived of liberty (by judicial or administrative decision, or involuntary hospitalization)
  • Not affiliated with a social security scheme or not benefiting from such a scheme

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University Hospital of Montpellier

Montpellier, Occitnaie, 34295, France

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Back Pain

Interventions

Injections, Spinal

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

InjectionsDrug Administration RoutesDrug TherapyTherapeutics

Study Officials

  • Maxime PASTOR, MD

    University Hospital, Montpellier

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Catherine CYTEVAL, MD PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 31, 2024

First Posted

January 7, 2025

Study Start

February 12, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2027

Last Updated

March 20, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-03

Locations