Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Predictors of Outcome of Rhythm Control in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter
1 other identifier
observational
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
evaluate the impact of various features in CMR on the mid-term/long-term success rate of rhythm control for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation/flutter .
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jan 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 17, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 6, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2026
CompletedJanuary 6, 2025
December 1, 2024
1 year
December 17, 2024
December 28, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Recurence in patient with AF or flutter after pharmacological or interventional rythm control
* Non-invasive rhythm control arm: Predictors of atrial fibrillation recurrence within 6 months of cardioversion or the need for ≥2 cardioversions in the 1st year after initial cardioversion. * Ablation arm: Predictors of success rate (acute and mid term) of ablation on multivariable logistic regression analysis.
Baseline
Secondary Outcomes (1)
parameters for safe ablation
Baseline
Eligibility Criteria
Based on the previously reported antiarrhythmic drug efficacy of 52% in maintaining sinus rhythm: * For Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test for difference in 2 group means: assuming an alpha error probability of 0.05, a study power of 60-70%, and a 1:1 ratio of successful rhythm control vs atrial fibrillation/flutter recurrence, a total sample size of 86-106 would be needed (43-53 for each arm). \[calculated by G\*Power software v.3.1.9.7\] * To be able to build multivariable logistic regression models including, e.g., 4-5 predictor variables, a reasonable sample size would be 80-100 patients. * Patient enrollment will continue until the projected sample size is satisfied or until 24 months have lapsed, whichever comes first.
You may qualify if:
- Age\>18 years.
- Patients undergoing successful cardioversion (pharmacologic or electric) for atrial fibrillation/flutter, OR symptomatic patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation/flutter scheduled for trans-catheter ablation.
- Index cardioversion OR Index ablation procedure.
You may not qualify if:
- LA thrombus on TEE or CMR.
- Contraindications to CMR.
- Contraindications to Gd-based contrast.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Assiut Univeristy Heart Hospital
Asyut, Egypt
Related Publications (1)
1. Calkins H et al. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009
BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Salah EL-dein Sayed Ata, Professor of cardiology
Assiut University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Resident Doctor at Assiut University Heart Hospital
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 17, 2024
First Posted
January 6, 2025
Study Start
January 1, 2025
Primary Completion
January 1, 2026
Study Completion
May 1, 2026
Last Updated
January 6, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-12