NCT06753903

Brief Summary

Colorectal cancer is the first leading cause of cancer death in men and second in women. Its incidence rates also increased by 1%-2% annually in young adults (ages \<55 years). The liver is the most common site of colorectal cancer metastasis, with approximately 25% 50% of patients developing liver metastases during the disease. Maximising resection of liver metastasis using all available techniques remains a key objective and provides the best chance of long-term survival and cure. For unresectable patients, optimal systemic and locoregional chemotherapeutic, biological and radiotherapeutic treatments improve survival, and may convert initially unresectable patients to operability. Computed Tomography is currently the modality of choice for patients staging and restaging for high spatial resolution providing accurate delineation of lesion, vascular structure and relation with surrounding structure. The portal venous phase (approximately 60-70 s after administration of contrast agent) is the most reliable phase for detection of liver metastasis with a detection rate of 85% with lower performance for lesion \<1 cm which are interpreted as too small to characterize. Compared to computed tomography, MRI has superior soft tissue contrast and the possibly of a multiparametric characterization of lesion thanks to the evaluation of diffusivity and the uptake of hepatospecific contrast media, resulting in higher accuracy also for lesion smaller than \< 10 mm. Photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT), used as standard clinical practice, by employing a reduced radiation dose, allows the acquisition of ultra-high resolution images (up to 169 microns) and spectral information, with a high detection rate of liver metastases and their characterization. Therefore, aim of the present study is to evaluate the value of PCD-CT in the detection of liver metastasis from colorectal cancer in comparison to MRI as reference standard.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
23mo left

Started Mar 2025

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress37%
Mar 2025Mar 2028

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 23, 2024

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 31, 2024

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 24, 2025

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 24, 2028

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 24, 2028

Last Updated

January 15, 2026

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

December 23, 2024

Last Update Submit

January 14, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • PCD-CT predictor of response to treatment in patients candidate to chemotherapy

    3 years

  • The non-inferiority of PCD-CT compared to MRI in identifying liver metastases from colorectal cancer

    3 years

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • the utility of machine learning-driven texture analysis in detecting prognostic imaging biomarkers for liver metastasis survival, with predictive performance measured by the concordance index.

    3 years

Interventions

PCD-CTPROCEDURE

Photon-counting detector computed tomography

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 100 Years
Sexall
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

100 patients with colorectal cancer and liver metastasis

You may qualify if:

  • adult (\>18 years)
  • non- biopsy-proven colon/colorectal carcinoma
  • CT performed on a PCD-CT
  • MRI with multiparametric protocol and hepatospecific contrast media

You may not qualify if:

  • pregnancy and breastfeeding
  • CT exam performed on a scan different from PCD-CT
  • absence of multiparametric MRI
  • MRI with non hepatospecific contrast agent
  • Absent informed consent signed

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

IRCCS San Raffaele

Milan, 20132, Italy

RECRUITING

Related Publications (6)

  • Siegel RL, Giaquinto AN, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2024. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 Jan-Feb;74(1):12-49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21820. Epub 2024 Jan 17.

    PMID: 38230766BACKGROUND
  • Martin J, Petrillo A, Smyth EC, Shaida N, Khwaja S, Cheow HK, Duckworth A, Heister P, Praseedom R, Jah A, Balakrishnan A, Harper S, Liau S, Kosmoliaptsis V, Huguet E. Colorectal liver metastases: Current management and future perspectives. World J Clin Oncol. 2020 Oct 24;11(10):761-808. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v11.i10.761.

    PMID: 33200074BACKGROUND
  • Soyer P, Poccard M, Boudiaf M, Abitbol M, Hamzi L, Panis Y, Valleur P, Rymer R. Detection of hypovascular hepatic metastases at triple-phase helical CT: sensitivity of phases and comparison with surgical and histopathologic findings. Radiology. 2004 May;231(2):413-20. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2312021639. Epub 2004 Mar 24.

    PMID: 15044747BACKGROUND
  • Sahani DV, Bajwa MA, Andrabi Y, Bajpai S, Cusack JC. Current status of imaging and emerging techniques to evaluate liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2014 May;259(5):861-72. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000525.

    PMID: 24509207BACKGROUND
  • Vilgrain V, Esvan M, Ronot M, Caumont-Prim A, Aube C, Chatellier G. A meta-analysis of diffusion-weighted and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging for the detection of liver metastases. Eur Radiol. 2016 Dec;26(12):4595-4615. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4250-5. Epub 2016 Feb 16.

    PMID: 26883327BACKGROUND
  • Wang Q, Shi G, Qi X, Fan X, Wang L. Quantitative analysis of the dual-energy CT virtual spectral curve for focal liver lesions characterization. Eur J Radiol. 2014 Oct;83(10):1759-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.07.009. Epub 2014 Jul 22.

    PMID: 25088350BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Intestinal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesColonic DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesRectal Diseases

Central Study Contacts

Antonio Esposito, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
OTHER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 23, 2024

First Posted

December 31, 2024

Study Start

March 24, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 24, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 24, 2028

Last Updated

January 15, 2026

Record last verified: 2025-12

Locations