Dialectical Behavior Therapy for Adolescents With Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders Feasibility Trial
2 other identifiers
interventional
9
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to test the feasibility of dialectical behavior therapy for adolescents (DBT-A) with fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD). In partnership with a community mental health practice, Genesee Valley Psychology (GVP), two cohorts of five adolescents with FASD and their caregivers will participate in an already existing comprehensive DBT-A program (including individual therapy, group skills training, and 24/7 phone coaching). This program has been adapted for neurodivergent teens, including the development of trainings for mental health clinicians on FASD. The aim of the current study is to assess the acceptability of DBT-A from the perspective of teens, caregivers, and clinicians. Additionally, barriers and facilitators of implementing DBT-A with teens with FASD, as well as the feasibility of the research protocol will be assessed to inform later larger-scale trials.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 18, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 24, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 24, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 29, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 29, 2025
CompletedFebruary 5, 2026
February 1, 2026
10 months
December 18, 2024
February 3, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Difficulties in emotion regulation scale caregiver and self-report
The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) is a validated self-report measure designed to assess challenges in regulating emotions. It evaluates six dimensions of emotion regulation difficulties: non-acceptance of emotional responses, difficulties engaging in goal-directed behavior when distressed, impulse control challenges during emotional distress, lack of emotional awareness, limited access to effective emotion regulation strategies, and lack of clarity about emotional experiences. This study will utilize the brief form consisting of 18 items rated on a Likert scale, with higher scores indicating greater difficulties in emotion regulation. Each scale has a score range of 3 to 15.
Baseline and Week 35
Child behavior checklist caregiver and youth report
The Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) is a standardized, parent-reported questionnaire designed to assess a wide range of emotional and behavioral problems in children and adolescents. It is part of the Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA) and evaluates competencies and problems in various domains. The CBCL yields scores across internalizing behaviors (e.g., anxiety, depression), externalizing behaviors (e.g., aggression, rule-breaking), and total problems. It also provides syndrome scales (e.g., anxious/depressed, somatic complaints, social problems) and DSM-oriented scales aligned with diagnostic criteria. The scales are reported as t-scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. The higher the t-score, the more significant the behavioral issues.
Baseline and week 35
The theoretical framework of acceptability questionnaire
The Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) defines acceptability as a multi-dimensional construct. The TFA identifies several dimensions that shape individuals' experiences with an intervention, including their affective attitude toward the intervention, the perceived burden or effort required to engage with it, the alignment of the intervention with their personal values and beliefs, and the extent to which they understand its purpose and mechanisms. It also considers the perceived opportunity costs of participation, participants' beliefs about the intervention's effectiveness, and their confidence in their ability to successfully engage with it. Each question is a 5-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating highter acceptability of treatment.
Week 35
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item
Base line to 9 months
General Anxiety Disorder 7-item
Base line to 9 months
Clinician therapeutic note documentation
Base line to 9 months
Study Arms (1)
Active DBT-A Intervention Arm
EXPERIMENTALA single cohort of teens with FASD will be administered DBT-A for the purpose of feasibility testing.
Interventions
Standard of care (SOC) DBT-A includes approximately six weeks of pretreatment, and approximately six months of DBT-A skills group, individual therapy, and 24/7 phone coaching. During pre-treatment, clients are oriented to the DBT-A model and client commitment to treatment is established. After approximately six weeks, the client enters DBT-A skills group along with their caregiver. This skills group meets weekly for 1.5 hours and clinicians explain the five main DBT-A skills (mindfulness, distress tolerance, emotion regulation, interpersonal effectiveness, and walking the middle path) via PowerPoints and discussion. Clients and their caregivers are assigned weekly homework. At the same time, teens are completing weekly 1-hour individual therapy sessions where they are utilizing the skills learned in group. Both teens and caregivers have access to what DBT-A calls 24/7 phone coaching. This phone coaching is 24/7 access to a therapist when a crisis is arising.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- For adolescents:
- Ages 14-17 years
- Have a diagnosis of FASD under any diagnostic criteria
- Residing in the state of New York
- Willing and able to attend group sessions virtually
- Have one of the following:
- A diagnosis of disruptive mood dysregulation disorder, borderline personality disorder, or multiple other serious mental health diagnoses
- A history of multiple psychiatric hospitalizations and/or recurring presentation at psychiatric emergency rooms
- A score of 7+ on the McLean screening instrument (MSI; instrument attached and included in eligibility screen)
- Have functional deficits in three of five problem areas:
- Emotional dysregulation
- Impulsivity (including avoidance)
- Interpersonal challenges
- Teenager and family challenges
- Reduced awareness and focus
- +9 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Adolescent, caregiver, or clinician has insufficient proficiency in English
- Primary psychotic disorder
- Ongoing substance/drug dependence or eating disorder at such a level that would impede engagement with DBT modalities (i.e. if an individual requires detoxification or hospitalization for stabilization)
- Adolescent or caregiver has a moderate to severe intellectual disability (IQ \< 51)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, New York, 14642, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Research Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 18, 2024
First Posted
December 24, 2024
Study Start
December 24, 2024
Primary Completion
October 29, 2025
Study Completion
October 29, 2025
Last Updated
February 5, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share