Behavioral Economic Intervention to Improve HIV Behaviors in Sexual Minority Individuals
Development of a Behavioral Economic Intervention to Improve HIV-related Behaviors Among Sexual Minority Individuals
2 other identifiers
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This research study is testing a new behavioral therapy called Episodic Future Thinking or EFT can help people reduce drug use and risky sexual behaviors while helping them adhere to their HIV prevention medication (PrEP). Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group will receive standard care, which includes counseling on HIV prevention, drug use reduction, and sexual health. The other group will receive standard care plus a new program called Episodic Future Thinking (EFT), where participants will think about and plan for their future goals using a mobile app and counseling sessions. Study procedures that are not part of regular care include filling out surveys, providing blood, urine, and swab samples for testing, and using the EFT app.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 13, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 20, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 3, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2027
June 22, 2025
June 1, 2025
1.8 years
December 13, 2024
June 18, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Dried Blood Spot Analysis for PrEP adherence
Blood spots will be collected and assessed for PrEP adherence. Number of subjects adhering to PrEP will be reported.
Day 1 to Day 180
Urine Collection for Drug Screening
Urine will be tested for drug screening. Number of subjects that result in a negative drug screening will be reported.
Day 1 to Day 180
Urine Collection for Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs)
Urine will be tested for STIs. Number of subjects that test negative for STIs will be reported.
Day 1 to Day 180
Rectal Swab for STI testing
A rectal swab will be obtained for STI. Number of subjects that test negative for STIs will be reported.
Day 1 to Day 180
Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Related Intentions
A 3-item scale to measure PrEP-related intentions (e.g., "During the next three months, I will talk to a health care provider about PrEP"; "During the next three months, I will seek out more information about PrEP" and "During the next three months, I will get a prescription for PrEP"). Response options will be 1 = No, definitely not; 2 = No, probably not; 3 = Yes, probably and 4=Yes, definitely. A total range of scores is 3-12 with a higher score indication a greater intention of taking preventative measures.
Day 1 to Day 180
PrEP Attitudes
A 5-item scale to evaluate attitudes regarding PrEP use (e.g., "People who take PrEP are responsible"; "Taking PrEP is safe"). Response options will range from 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree. Total scores will range between 5 and 25, with higher scores indicating more favorable attitudes toward PrEP use.
Day 1 to Day 180
PrEP Stigma
A 5-item scale to assess PrEP stigma (e.g., "People who take PrEP are promiscuous"). Responses will be on a 5-point scale, ranging from 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly disagree. The total range of scores is 5-25, where higher scores denote greater stigma associated with PrEP.
Day 1 to Day 180
PrEP Self-efficacy
Participants will self-report the level of difficulty they anticipate in performing 8 behaviors associated with PrEP use (e.g., "How difficult would it be for you to seek out more information about PrEP to decide if it is right for you?"). Responses will be on a scale from 1=very hard to do to 4=very easy to do. Total scores range from 8-32, where higher scores suggest higher levels of self-efficacy.
Day 1 to Day 180
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Rapid HIV test
Day 30 to Day 180
Delayed Discounting
Day 1 to Day 180
Demand
Day 1 to Day 180
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-5-TR Self-rated Level 1
Day 1 to Day 180
Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7)
Day 1 to Day 180
Study Arms (2)
Episodic Future Thinking App
EXPERIMENTALEFT is a behavioral economic intervention designed to improve decision-making by reducing delay discounting and improving demand. The EFT intervention will be administered through a combination of in-person counseling sessions and mobile health (mHealth) technology via an app platform.
Control Group
NO INTERVENTIONStandard of Care: The standard of care group will receive brief information and supportive counseling around PrEP adherence, methamphetamine use reduction and engaging in safe sexual behaviors. Participants will also receive counseling on a topic of concern identified by the participant.
Interventions
Participants who meet the eligibility criteria will receive the EFT intervention, a cognitive training exercise designed to help them generate and visualize future events or goals. The intervention will be administered individually, in person, by a trained counselor
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults 18 - 34 years of age
- HIV negative (assessed via Rapid HIV Antibody Test)
- Identify as gay, or bisexual
- Recent (past 3 months) methamphetamine use
- Currently prescribed and taking HIV PrEP medication
- Self-reported HIV PrEP nonadherence in the past three months
- Urine screen test for PrEP nonadherence
- Self-reported condomless anal sex or a STI in the past three months
- Able to attend all study visits
- Fluent in English
You may not qualify if:
- Currently receiving treatment for any substance use disorder,
- HIV positive
- Having a medical or psychiatric illness that in the opinion of the PI would interfere with study participation
- Unable to provide informed consent
- Unable to attend protocol directed study visits
- Any plans that would preclude study completion (e.g. surgery, major medical treatments such as chemotherapy, incarceration, travel/moving out of San Antonio, Texas)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Emeka Okafor, PhD, MPH
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Although it is not possible to fully blind participants due to the nature of the EFT intervention, research staff responsible for outcome assessments (e.g., PrEP adherence, methamphetamine use, and sexual risk behaviors) will be blinded to the participants' group assignment to minimize assessment bias.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 13, 2024
First Posted
December 20, 2024
Study Start
March 3, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2027
Last Updated
June 22, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- Summary results will be published through ClinicalTrials.gov and the study results will be published in a peer review journal after study completion and data analysis.
Publication policy will focus on ensuring that all dissemination of research findings from this study is conducted in an accurate, transparent and ethical manner. Authorship will be determined based on significant contributions to the study's conception, design, data acquisition, analysis or interpretation as well as in drafting and critically revising the manuscript. During this review process any potentially identifiable information will be carefully reviewed and anonymized if necessary.