NCT06741813

Brief Summary

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the important consolidation for adult T-LBL. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT) is also the important consolidation for adult T-LBL. So ASCT vs allo-HSCT: which is better consolidation for adult T-LBL?

Trial Health

65
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
230

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
45mo left

Started Jan 2025

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress27%
Jan 2025Dec 2029

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 15, 2024

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 19, 2024

Completed
13 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2025

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2027

Expected
2 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2029

Last Updated

December 19, 2024

Status Verified

December 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

December 15, 2024

Last Update Submit

December 15, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantationAutologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantationT Lymphoblastic Lymphoma

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Progression-free survival

    Progression-free survival (PFS), defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of disease progression/relapse, or death due to any cause.

    Probability of PFS at months 1, 2, 6, 12, 18 & 24 will be estimated from the Kaplan-Meier curves for each arm.

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Relapse

    Cumulative incidence of disease progression/relapse at months 1, 2, 6, 12, 18 & 24 will be estimated, considering non-relapse mortality as competing events.

  • Non-relapse mortality (NRM)

    Cumulative incidence of NRM at months 1, 2, 6, 12, 18 & 24 will be estimated, considering disease progression/relapse as competing events.

  • Overall survival (OS)

    Probability of overall survival at months 1, 2, 6, 12, 18 & 24 will be estimated from the Kaplan-Meier curves for each arm.

Study Arms (2)

ASCT group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

T-LBL patients achieving CR after induction chemotherapy and then received ASCT as first line consolidation

Procedure: ASCT

Allo-HSCT

EXPERIMENTAL

T-LBL patients achieving CR after induction chemotherapy and received allo-HSCT as first line consolidation

Procedure: Allo-HSCT

Interventions

ASCTPROCEDURE

The chemotherapy-based preconditioning regimen was BeEAM, which consisted of bendamustine (120-180 mg·m-2·day-1,days -8 to -7), etoposide (200 mg·m-2·day-1,days -6 to -3), cytarabine (400 mg·m-2·day-1,days -6 to -3), and melphalan (140 mg·m-2·day-1,days -2).

ASCT group
Allo-HSCTPROCEDURE

Chemotherapy-based preconditioning regimen consisted of cytarabine 4 g·m-2·day-1 (days -9), busulfan (3.2 mg·kg-1·day-1 administered intravenously on days -8 to -6) (day 0 being the first day of donor cell infusion), cyclophosphamide (1.8 g·m-2·day-1, days -5 to -4), and semustine (250 mg.m-2, day -3). For the patients older than 55 years old or with HCT-CI score of 3 or more, cyclophosphamide can be decreased to 1.0 g·m-2·day-1, days -5 to -4, and added fludarabine (30mg·m-2·day-1, days -6 to -2). Rabbit antithymocyte globulin (thymoglobulin, 1.5 to 2.5 mg/kg, days -5 to -2; Sanofi, France) was administered to the HID and URD groups or MSD HSCT recipients who older than 40 years old (1.5 mg/kg, days -4 to -2). All MSD, HID, and URD HSCT recipinets received cyclosporine A (CsA), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and short-term methotrexate (MTX) for GVHD prophylaxis. CsA (2.5 mg/kg, q12h, intravenous \[i.v.\]) was used from day -9, of which the trough concentration was adjusted to 150-250 ng

Allo-HSCT

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • \) Newly diagnosed T-LBL; 2) 18-65 years of age at the time of diagnosis; 3) Categorized into Ann-Arbor stage III or IV; 4) Achieving complete response (CR) after 3 courses of induction chemotherapies; 5) ECOG PS score 0 or 1; 6) It needs consent from the patients or/and legal guardian, and signature on the Informed Consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • \) Newly diagnosed T-LBL, but categorized into Ann-Arbor stage I or II; 2) \< 18 years, or older than 65 years at the time of diagnosis; 3) Achieving CR after 4 or more courses of induction chemotherapies, or could not achieve at least CR after induction chemotherapies; 4) with \> 25% BM involvement or \> 5% lymphoma cells in the peripheral blood; 5) ECOG PS score of 2 or more; 6) Patients with other comorbidities or mental diseases that influence the life safety and compliance of patients as well as affect informed consent, enrollment in the research, follow-up visit or result interpretation.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Precursor T-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaLeukemia, LymphoidLeukemiaNeoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasmsHematologic DiseasesHemic and Lymphatic DiseasesLymphoproliferative DisordersLymphatic DiseasesImmunoproliferative DisordersImmune System Diseases

Central Study Contacts

Xiao-Dong Mo None

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: For the adult patients (≥ 18 years) with Ann-Arbor stage III or IV T-LBL and achieving CR after 3 courses of induction chemotherapy, all the patients who fulfilled inclusion/exclusion criteria were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive ASCT (ASCT group) or receive allo-HSCT (Allo-HSCT group). Patients would receive additional 1 course of chemotherapy after randomization and then received HSCT. Then we compared the clinical outcomes between the two groups.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 15, 2024

First Posted

December 19, 2024

Study Start

January 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2029

Last Updated

December 19, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share