Broadening Antiemetics Research by Comparing the Effectiveness of Fosaprepitant and Metoclopramide
BARF RCT
1 other identifier
interventional
212
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The study team proposes a double-blind, comparative effectiveness, randomized controlled trial (RCT) to address the following goal: to determine the relative efficacy and adverse event profile of fosaprepitant compared to the standard of care antiemetic metoclopramide. Fosaprepitant and its active metabolite aprepitant are a relatively new class of antiemetic that exclusively acts in the central nervous system by blocking neurokinin (NK-1) which is a key signaling molecule in the centrally mediated aspects of the vomiting reflex. Currently, fosaprepitant and aprepitant both have only two United Stated Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) approved indications for nausea and vomiting: chemotherapy-induced and postoperative. Neurokinin inhibitors are highly effective and generally well-tolerated. Therefore, this class of medication may be a more appropriate medication for the millions of patients with nausea and vomiting that seek care in emergency departments (EDs). Intravenous fosaprepitant is converted to the active metabolite aprepitant on the order of minutes and is significantly cheaper to procure at this time.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started May 2026
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 14, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 18, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2027
September 8, 2025
September 1, 2025
9 months
December 14, 2024
September 2, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Sustained Nausea and Vomiting (NV) Relief
The primary efficacy outcome for this study will be sustained relief from NV at 2 hours following medication administration. Sustained relief from NV will be determined by the intensity of nausea reported by patients following administration of antiemetic. Intensity of nausea will be reported as either "None", "Mild", "Moderate" or "Severe." The number/percentage of patients reporting each degree of nausea intensity at 2 hours will be summarized by study arm. Sustained relief of NV requires a patient to present with a nausea intensity of either "Severe" or "Moderate," which is then reduced by treatment to at least "Mild" or None," within 2 hours of medication administration without the use of any rescue medication. Patients who do not report an initial nausea intensity of either "Severe" or "Moderate" will not be assessed as they are not eligible for the study.
2 hours (assessed at the 2-hour mark after administration of the intervention)
Development of New Symptom
The primary tolerability outcome for this study will be the onset of any new symptoms within 2 hours after medication administration. Onset of symptoms will be assessed by asking patients if they developed any new symptoms after administration of the investigational medication. Symptoms will be elicited using an open-ended format. Patients who confirmed that they had experienced new symptoms will be asked to grade the severity of the new symptom(s) using the descriptors "Mild", "Moderate", or "Severe". The frequency and intensity of new symptoms will be summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.
2 hours (assessed at the 2-hour mark after administration of the intervention)
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Sustained NV Relief
24 hours following medication administration
NV Relief
24 hours (measured every 15 minutes for the first 2 hours, then hourly after that until final disposition; reassessed at 24 hours)
NV Freedom
24 hours (measured every 15 minutes for the first 2 hours, then hourly after that until final disposition; reassessed at 24 hours)
Sustained NV Freedom
24 hours following medication administration
Medication Preference
24 hours
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (8)
Severity of Nausea
24 hours (measured every 15 minutes for the first 2 hours, then hourly after that until disposition; reassessed at 24 hours)
QTc Interval (QT interval corrected for heart rate)
Prior to Intervention and at disposition, approximately 2 hours
Need for rescue antiemetic medication
2 hours (assessed at the 2-hour mark after administration of the intervention)
- +5 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Investigational Intervention
EXPERIMENTALFosaprepitant
Standard-of-Care Intervention
ACTIVE COMPARATORMetoclopramide
Interventions
Fosaprepitant 150mg IV administered over 15 minutes
Metoclopramide 10mg IV administered over 15 minutes
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults at least 18 years old
- Present to ED for treatment of Nausea and/or vomiting as defined by the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) or identified by treating clinician
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy, desiring pregnancy, or lactating
- Antiemetic use or intravenous fluids prior to presenting to ED for evaluation and management
- Bradycardia (\< 60 bpm heart rate)
- Prolonged QTc (greater than 490ms)
- Not conversant in English or Spanish
- Altered mental status
- Dementia
- Lack of phone for follow-up communication
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Montefiore Medical Center
The Bronx, New York, 10467, United States
Related Publications (11)
Mechanisms and Control of Emesis: A Satellite Symposium of the European Neuroscience Association: Proceedings of an International Meeting Held in Marseille (France), 4-7 September 1992. John Libbey Eurotext
BACKGROUNDSingh P, Yoon SS, Kuo B. Nausea: a review of pathophysiology and therapeutics. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2016 Jan;9(1):98-112. doi: 10.1177/1756283X15618131.
PMID: 26770271BACKGROUNDHealthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2006 Feb-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK52651/
PMID: 21413206BACKGROUNDPourmand A, Mazer-Amirshahi M, Chistov S, Sabha Y, Vukomanovic D, Almulhim M. Emergency department approach to QTc prolongation. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Dec;35(12):1928-1933. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.08.044. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
PMID: 28855066BACKGROUNDFranklin BJ, Vakili S, Huckman RS, Hosein S, Falk N, Cheng K, Murray M, Harris S, Morris CA, Goralnick E. The Inpatient Discharge Lounge as a Potential Mechanism to Mitigate Emergency Department Boarding and Crowding. Ann Emerg Med. 2020 Jun;75(6):704-714. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.12.002. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
PMID: 31983501BACKGROUNDAapro M, Carides A, Rapoport BL, Schmoll HJ, Zhang L, Warr D. Aprepitant and fosaprepitant: a 10-year review of efficacy and safety. Oncologist. 2015 Apr;20(4):450-8. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0229. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
PMID: 25795636BACKGROUNDLangford P, Chrisp P. Fosaprepitant and aprepitant: an update of the evidence for their place in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Core Evid. 2010 Oct 21;5:77-90. doi: 10.2147/ce.s6012.
PMID: 21042544BACKGROUNDFuryk JS, Meek RA, Egerton-Warburton D. Drugs for the treatment of nausea and vomiting in adults in the emergency department setting. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 28;2015(9):CD010106. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010106.pub2.
PMID: 26411330BACKGROUNDYang Y, Yang N, Wu L, Ouyang Q, Fang J, Li J, Liao W, Cai K, Huang J, Li J, Zhang Y, Wang X, Zhang H, Xu N, Zhao Q, Hu X, Li W, Zhong W, Zhong D, Cheng G, Ye S, Zhong M, Wang D, Liu H, Zheng J, Liu X, Xu H, Zhang L. Safety and efficacy of aprepitant as mono and combination therapy for the prevention of emetogenic chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: post-marketing surveillance in China. Chin Clin Oncol. 2020 Oct;9(5):68. doi: 10.21037/cco-20-160.
PMID: 33161724BACKGROUNDBraude D, Soliz T, Crandall C, Hendey G, Andrews J, Weichenthal L. Antiemetics in the ED: a randomized controlled trial comparing 3 common agents. Am J Emerg Med. 2006 Mar;24(2):177-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2005.08.017.
PMID: 16490647BACKGROUNDCham S, Basire M, Kelly AM. Intermediate dose metoclopramide is not more effective than standard dose metoclopramide for patients who present to the emergency department with nausea and vomiting: a pilot study. Emerg Med Australas. 2004 Jun;16(3):208-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2004.00588.x.
PMID: 15228463BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Benjamin Friedman, MD
Montefiore Medical Center
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 14, 2024
First Posted
December 18, 2024
Study Start
May 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
February 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
February 1, 2027
Last Updated
September 8, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09