NCT06740812

Brief Summary

The study team proposes a double-blind, comparative effectiveness, randomized controlled trial (RCT) to address the following goal: to determine the relative efficacy and adverse event profile of fosaprepitant compared to the standard of care antiemetic metoclopramide. Fosaprepitant and its active metabolite aprepitant are a relatively new class of antiemetic that exclusively acts in the central nervous system by blocking neurokinin (NK-1) which is a key signaling molecule in the centrally mediated aspects of the vomiting reflex. Currently, fosaprepitant and aprepitant both have only two United Stated Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) approved indications for nausea and vomiting: chemotherapy-induced and postoperative. Neurokinin inhibitors are highly effective and generally well-tolerated. Therefore, this class of medication may be a more appropriate medication for the millions of patients with nausea and vomiting that seek care in emergency departments (EDs). Intravenous fosaprepitant is converted to the active metabolite aprepitant on the order of minutes and is significantly cheaper to procure at this time.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
212

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_4

Timeline
9mo left

Started May 2026

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress2%
May 2026Feb 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 14, 2024

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 18, 2024

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2026

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2027

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2027

Last Updated

September 8, 2025

Status Verified

September 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

December 14, 2024

Last Update Submit

September 2, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Signs and Symptoms, DigestiveAntiemeticsAutonomic AgentsPeripheral Nervous System AgentsPhysiological Effects of DrugsGastrointestinal AgentsAntipruriticsDermatologic AgentsNeurotransmitter AgentsMolecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological ActionNeurokinin-1 Receptor AntagonistsFosaprepitantAprepitantDopamine Receptor AntagonistRandomized Control TrialMetoclopramideAdults

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Sustained Nausea and Vomiting (NV) Relief

    The primary efficacy outcome for this study will be sustained relief from NV at 2 hours following medication administration. Sustained relief from NV will be determined by the intensity of nausea reported by patients following administration of antiemetic. Intensity of nausea will be reported as either "None", "Mild", "Moderate" or "Severe." The number/percentage of patients reporting each degree of nausea intensity at 2 hours will be summarized by study arm. Sustained relief of NV requires a patient to present with a nausea intensity of either "Severe" or "Moderate," which is then reduced by treatment to at least "Mild" or None," within 2 hours of medication administration without the use of any rescue medication. Patients who do not report an initial nausea intensity of either "Severe" or "Moderate" will not be assessed as they are not eligible for the study.

    2 hours (assessed at the 2-hour mark after administration of the intervention)

  • Development of New Symptom

    The primary tolerability outcome for this study will be the onset of any new symptoms within 2 hours after medication administration. Onset of symptoms will be assessed by asking patients if they developed any new symptoms after administration of the investigational medication. Symptoms will be elicited using an open-ended format. Patients who confirmed that they had experienced new symptoms will be asked to grade the severity of the new symptom(s) using the descriptors "Mild", "Moderate", or "Severe". The frequency and intensity of new symptoms will be summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.

    2 hours (assessed at the 2-hour mark after administration of the intervention)

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Sustained NV Relief

    24 hours following medication administration

  • NV Relief

    24 hours (measured every 15 minutes for the first 2 hours, then hourly after that until final disposition; reassessed at 24 hours)

  • NV Freedom

    24 hours (measured every 15 minutes for the first 2 hours, then hourly after that until final disposition; reassessed at 24 hours)

  • Sustained NV Freedom

    24 hours following medication administration

  • Medication Preference

    24 hours

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (8)

  • Severity of Nausea

    24 hours (measured every 15 minutes for the first 2 hours, then hourly after that until disposition; reassessed at 24 hours)

  • QTc Interval (QT interval corrected for heart rate)

    Prior to Intervention and at disposition, approximately 2 hours

  • Need for rescue antiemetic medication

    2 hours (assessed at the 2-hour mark after administration of the intervention)

  • +5 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Investigational Intervention

EXPERIMENTAL

Fosaprepitant

Drug: Fosaprepitant for Injection

Standard-of-Care Intervention

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Metoclopramide

Drug: Metoclopramide Injection

Interventions

Fosaprepitant 150mg IV administered over 15 minutes

Investigational Intervention

Metoclopramide 10mg IV administered over 15 minutes

Also known as: Reglan
Standard-of-Care Intervention

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adults at least 18 years old
  • Present to ED for treatment of Nausea and/or vomiting as defined by the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) or identified by treating clinician

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnancy, desiring pregnancy, or lactating
  • Antiemetic use or intravenous fluids prior to presenting to ED for evaluation and management
  • Bradycardia (\< 60 bpm heart rate)
  • Prolonged QTc (greater than 490ms)
  • Not conversant in English or Spanish
  • Altered mental status
  • Dementia
  • Lack of phone for follow-up communication

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Montefiore Medical Center

The Bronx, New York, 10467, United States

Location

Related Publications (11)

  • Mechanisms and Control of Emesis: A Satellite Symposium of the European Neuroscience Association: Proceedings of an International Meeting Held in Marseille (France), 4-7 September 1992. John Libbey Eurotext

    BACKGROUND
  • Singh P, Yoon SS, Kuo B. Nausea: a review of pathophysiology and therapeutics. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2016 Jan;9(1):98-112. doi: 10.1177/1756283X15618131.

    PMID: 26770271BACKGROUND
  • Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2006 Feb-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK52651/

    PMID: 21413206BACKGROUND
  • Pourmand A, Mazer-Amirshahi M, Chistov S, Sabha Y, Vukomanovic D, Almulhim M. Emergency department approach to QTc prolongation. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Dec;35(12):1928-1933. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.08.044. Epub 2017 Aug 24.

    PMID: 28855066BACKGROUND
  • Franklin BJ, Vakili S, Huckman RS, Hosein S, Falk N, Cheng K, Murray M, Harris S, Morris CA, Goralnick E. The Inpatient Discharge Lounge as a Potential Mechanism to Mitigate Emergency Department Boarding and Crowding. Ann Emerg Med. 2020 Jun;75(6):704-714. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.12.002. Epub 2020 Jan 23.

    PMID: 31983501BACKGROUND
  • Aapro M, Carides A, Rapoport BL, Schmoll HJ, Zhang L, Warr D. Aprepitant and fosaprepitant: a 10-year review of efficacy and safety. Oncologist. 2015 Apr;20(4):450-8. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0229. Epub 2015 Mar 20.

    PMID: 25795636BACKGROUND
  • Langford P, Chrisp P. Fosaprepitant and aprepitant: an update of the evidence for their place in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Core Evid. 2010 Oct 21;5:77-90. doi: 10.2147/ce.s6012.

    PMID: 21042544BACKGROUND
  • Furyk JS, Meek RA, Egerton-Warburton D. Drugs for the treatment of nausea and vomiting in adults in the emergency department setting. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 28;2015(9):CD010106. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010106.pub2.

    PMID: 26411330BACKGROUND
  • Yang Y, Yang N, Wu L, Ouyang Q, Fang J, Li J, Liao W, Cai K, Huang J, Li J, Zhang Y, Wang X, Zhang H, Xu N, Zhao Q, Hu X, Li W, Zhong W, Zhong D, Cheng G, Ye S, Zhong M, Wang D, Liu H, Zheng J, Liu X, Xu H, Zhang L. Safety and efficacy of aprepitant as mono and combination therapy for the prevention of emetogenic chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: post-marketing surveillance in China. Chin Clin Oncol. 2020 Oct;9(5):68. doi: 10.21037/cco-20-160.

    PMID: 33161724BACKGROUND
  • Braude D, Soliz T, Crandall C, Hendey G, Andrews J, Weichenthal L. Antiemetics in the ED: a randomized controlled trial comparing 3 common agents. Am J Emerg Med. 2006 Mar;24(2):177-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2005.08.017.

    PMID: 16490647BACKGROUND
  • Cham S, Basire M, Kelly AM. Intermediate dose metoclopramide is not more effective than standard dose metoclopramide for patients who present to the emergency department with nausea and vomiting: a pilot study. Emerg Med Australas. 2004 Jun;16(3):208-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2004.00588.x.

    PMID: 15228463BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

NauseaVomitingSigns and Symptoms, Digestive

Interventions

fosaprepitantInjectionsMetoclopramide

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Signs and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Drug Administration RoutesDrug TherapyTherapeuticsBenzamidesAmidesOrganic Chemicalspara-AminobenzoatesAminobenzoatesBenzoatesAcids, CarbocyclicCarboxylic AcidsChlorobenzoatesHydroxybenzoate EthersHydroxybenzoatesHydroxy AcidsBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsPhenyl EthersPhenols

Study Officials

  • Benjamin Friedman, MD

    Montefiore Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Mustfa K Manzur, MD MPH MS

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 14, 2024

First Posted

December 18, 2024

Study Start

May 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2027

Last Updated

September 8, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-09

Locations