Investigating the Upper Limb During the First 6 Months After Sustaining a Cervical Spinal Cord Injury,
In Ul 6 SCI
3 other identifiers
observational
210
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The goal of this observational study is to investigate and describe the injury patterns, secondary complications, and biomechanical properties of the upper limb during the initial 6 months post-SCI. The overarching objective is to investigate and describe the trajectory of upper limb functioning, secondary complications, and biomechanical properties of the upper limb during the initial 6 months post-SCI and explore factors influencing functional use of the hands at 6 months after injury.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jan 2025
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 9, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 18, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 7, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 6, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2026
December 18, 2024
December 1, 2024
1.7 years
December 9, 2024
December 13, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Motor neuron testing
Motor neuron testing, using the well established NeuroMuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES). Identification of the LMN integrity in defined muscle will be done by surface electrical stimulation of the forearm according to standardized technique (Bersch 2018). A standard four-channel nerve stimulator ( Chattanooga Rehab SKU 2533110-INT) will be used and with stimulation parameters according to international recommendations for nerve/muscle stimulation; 20-80 mA, 250-300 μs at 35 Hz (Bersch 2022). All stimulators have CE approval, approved as medical technical product (medicinteknisk produkt) in Sweden and manuals in both Swedish and English are available. The stimulator will be used within approved area.
1,2,3,6 months post injury
Other Outcomes (8)
International Standards for Neurological Classification of SCI (ISNCSCI) including the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS)
At admission and discharge from inpatient setting. Both assessments will be from date of inclusion until the date of final assessment at 6 months (-1+2 months) or date withdrawn from study, whichever came first, assessed up to 8 months
Muscle strength
1,2,3,6months
Modified Ashworth scale
1,2,3,6 months
- +5 more other outcomes
Interventions
Observational study of the changes in upper limb after SCI paralysis
Eligibility Criteria
All individuals with acute onset cervical SCI (traumatic and non-traumatic) C0-C7 AIS A-D that affects motor function in the upper limb at the following study sites will be invited; In Sweden; Region Skåne, Region Västerbotten, Region Stockholm, Västra Götalandsregionen. In New Zealand, the two national spinal units in Auckland and Christchurch. In Canada: Lyndhurst Toronto rehab, KITE, Toronto.
You may qualify if:
- Signed informed consent
- Acute onset Cervical SCI (traumatic and non-traumatic) C0-C7 AIS A-D that affects motor function in the upper limb.
- Over the age of 18 at admission
- Admitted for rehabilitation at one of the study sites.
You may not qualify if:
- For the surveys: Inability to understand Swedish or English in writing.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Vastra Gotaland Regionlead
- Promobilia Foundationcollaborator
Related Publications (8)
Harvey LA, Dunlop SA, Churilov L, Hsueh YS, Galea MP. Early intensive hand rehabilitation after spinal cord injury ("Hands On"): a protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2011 Jan 17;12:14. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-14.
PMID: 21235821RESULTAnderson KD. Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population. J Neurotrauma. 2004 Oct;21(10):1371-83. doi: 10.1089/neu.2004.21.1371.
PMID: 15672628RESULTGrampurohit N, Bell A, Duff SV, Mulcahey MJ, Thielen CC, Kaplan G, Marino RJ. Highlighting gaps in spinal cord injury research in activity-based interventions for the upper extremity: A scoping review. NeuroRehabilitation. 2021;49(1):23-38. doi: 10.3233/NRE-210042.
PMID: 33967071RESULTSnoek GJ, IJzerman MJ, Hermens HJ, Maxwell D, Biering-Sorensen F. Survey of the needs of patients with spinal cord injury: impact and priority for improvement in hand function in tetraplegics. Spinal Cord. 2004 Sep;42(9):526-32. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101638.
PMID: 15224087RESULTBaunsgaard CB, Nissen UV, Christensen KB, Biering-Sorensen F. Modified Ashworth scale and spasm frequency score in spinal cord injury: reliability and correlation. Spinal Cord. 2016 Sep;54(9):702-8. doi: 10.1038/sc.2015.230. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
PMID: 26857270RESULTKirshblum SC, Burns SP, Biering-Sorensen F, Donovan W, Graves DE, Jha A, Johansen M, Jones L, Krassioukov A, Mulcahey MJ, Schmidt-Read M, Waring W. International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury (revised 2011). J Spinal Cord Med. 2011 Nov;34(6):535-46. doi: 10.1179/204577211X13207446293695. No abstract available.
PMID: 22330108RESULTBersch I, Koch-Borner S, Friden J. Electrical stimulation-a mapping system for hand dysfunction in tetraplegia. Spinal Cord. 2018 May;56(5):516-522. doi: 10.1038/s41393-017-0042-2. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
PMID: 29358674RESULTBersch I, Krebs J, Friden J. A Prediction Model for Various Treatment Pathways of Upper Extremity in Tetraplegia. Front Rehabil Sci. 2022 Jun 30;3:889577. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2022.889577. eCollection 2022.
PMID: 36188973RESULT
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Johanna Wangdell, PhD
Västra Götalandsregionen, Sahlgrenska University Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 9, 2024
First Posted
December 18, 2024
Study Start
January 7, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 6, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 30, 2026
Last Updated
December 18, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Data will only be analysed on group level and within the research group.