Comparing the Effectiveness of Traditional Physiotherapy Combined With Virtual Reality for Post-Stroke Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
24
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of combining virtual reality (VR) therapy with traditional physiotherapy in post-stroke rehabilitation. Post-stroke patients often suffer from impairments in motor function, balance, and overall quality of life. While traditional physiotherapy is a widely accepted method for stroke recovery, incorporating VR technology may enhance treatment outcomes by providing an engaging, immersive environment that motivates patients to perform therapeutic movements.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable stroke
Started Feb 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 28, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 13, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 18, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2025
CompletedDecember 18, 2024
December 1, 2024
5 months
December 13, 2024
December 13, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
Assesses balance and stability.- \*Purpose\*: Assesses balance in older adults and individuals with balance disorders. * \*Items\*: 14 tasks, such as sitting, standing, reaching, and turning. * \*Scoring\*: Each task is scored on a scale of 0-4 (0 = inability to perform the task, 4 = normal performance). * \*Total Score\*: The maximum score is 56. Higher scores indicate better balance. A score below 45 indicates a higher risk of falling.
12 Months
Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS)
Measures trunk control and stability. SF-12 Health Survey: Evaluates quality of life in physical and mental health domains.The \*Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS)\* is a clinical tool used to assess trunk performance in individuals, particularly those with neurological impairments like stroke. It measures three key aspects: \*static sitting balance, \*\*dynamic sitting balance, and \*\*coordination of trunk movements. The scale consists of \*\*17 items\*, with scores ranging from 0 to 23. Higher scores indicate better trunk control and stability. It helps clinicians evaluate and track improvements in trunk function over time, guiding rehabilitation interventions.
12 Months
Study Arms (2)
Interventional group I
EXPERIMENTALInterventional group II
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Participants receive standard physiotherapy exercises aimed at improving motor function, balance, and trunk stability. These exercises include stretching, balance training, and muscle-strengthening activities.
Participants receive the same physiotherapy exercises as the traditional group, but with additional sessions involving virtual reality exercises. The VR component includes immersive activities that stimulate motor control, coordination, and cognitive engagement to support functional recovery.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Stroke, either ischemic or hemorrhagic
- Participants who can ambulate independently or with minimal assistance.
- Participants who were willing \& able to adhere to the study protocol.
- Including participants who were attending follow-up appointments \& completing outcome measures.
- Participants who were able to understand \& provide written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Existence of additional neurological disorders (such as multiple sclerosis or Parkinson's disease) or serious medical conditions that could prevent participants from participating in the study.
- Participants receiving rehabilitation or rigorous physical treatment in the previous three months were excluded.
- Pregnant women or breastfeeding women.
- Participants who refused to participate in the study or provide informed consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Services Hospital, Shadman 1
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 13, 2024
First Posted
December 18, 2024
Study Start
February 28, 2024
Primary Completion
August 1, 2024
Study Completion
March 1, 2025
Last Updated
December 18, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share